Floristic composition, diversity and edaphic effects in two rocky savanna communities in the Amazon and Cerrado, Brazil

M. J. G. Pessoa, Leonardo Maracahipes‐Santos, Josias Oliveira dos Santos, B. Oliveira, I. Silva, A. C. Abadia, E. Lenza
{"title":"Floristic composition, diversity and edaphic effects in two rocky savanna communities in the Amazon and Cerrado, Brazil","authors":"M. J. G. Pessoa, Leonardo Maracahipes‐Santos, Josias Oliveira dos Santos, B. Oliveira, I. Silva, A. C. Abadia, E. Lenza","doi":"10.5902/1980509841937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the uniqueness and reach of the flora from natural savannas in the Brazilian Amazon, and the existence of studies on its origin and diversity, there are no local studies associating floristic patterns with soil properties in savanna enclaves in the Amazon region of the state of Mato Grosso. Floristic composition and diversity were compared between a woody community from a rocky savanna inselberg in a transition region (RTS) between the two largest South American biomes (Cerrado-Amazon), and an enclave of rocky savanna in the Amazon (RAS), and the effects of soil properties were investigated. Floristic comparisons were also made between the two studied communities and two other rocky savanna communities near the Cerrado-Amazon transition. The flora and physical and chemical soil properties in twenty-five 20 × 20 m subplots (1 ha) in each community were sampled and georeferenced. An evident floristic distinction was found between the two studied communities, with low similarity values and a high number of indicator species. The observed and estimated richness and Rényi diversity profiles indicated lower species diversity in RAS than in RTS. Soils were found to be litholic, poorly drained, dystrophic, alic, extremely acidic, sandy and nutrient poor. Species composition and abundance was associated with soil properties in both communities. The clear difference in species composition and diversity between RTS and RAS seem to be shaped by soil properties, geographic isolation and floristic influence from the Cerrado and the Amazon. These results broaden the knowledge regarding the composition and diversity of woody plants of savannas in Amazonian enclaves and Cerrado inselbergs, and provide an important set of floristic and edaphic descriptors for the phytogeography of rocky savannas.","PeriodicalId":10246,"journal":{"name":"Ciência Florestal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciência Florestal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509841937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Despite the uniqueness and reach of the flora from natural savannas in the Brazilian Amazon, and the existence of studies on its origin and diversity, there are no local studies associating floristic patterns with soil properties in savanna enclaves in the Amazon region of the state of Mato Grosso. Floristic composition and diversity were compared between a woody community from a rocky savanna inselberg in a transition region (RTS) between the two largest South American biomes (Cerrado-Amazon), and an enclave of rocky savanna in the Amazon (RAS), and the effects of soil properties were investigated. Floristic comparisons were also made between the two studied communities and two other rocky savanna communities near the Cerrado-Amazon transition. The flora and physical and chemical soil properties in twenty-five 20 × 20 m subplots (1 ha) in each community were sampled and georeferenced. An evident floristic distinction was found between the two studied communities, with low similarity values and a high number of indicator species. The observed and estimated richness and Rényi diversity profiles indicated lower species diversity in RAS than in RTS. Soils were found to be litholic, poorly drained, dystrophic, alic, extremely acidic, sandy and nutrient poor. Species composition and abundance was associated with soil properties in both communities. The clear difference in species composition and diversity between RTS and RAS seem to be shaped by soil properties, geographic isolation and floristic influence from the Cerrado and the Amazon. These results broaden the knowledge regarding the composition and diversity of woody plants of savannas in Amazonian enclaves and Cerrado inselbergs, and provide an important set of floristic and edaphic descriptors for the phytogeography of rocky savannas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西亚马逊河和塞拉多两个石质稀树草原群落的植物区系组成、多样性和土壤效应
尽管巴西亚马逊地区热带稀树草原植物的独特性和分布范围,以及对其起源和多样性的研究,但在马托格罗索州亚马逊地区的热带稀树草原飞地,尚无将植物区系模式与土壤性质联系起来的当地研究。比较了南美两大生物群落塞拉多-亚马逊过渡区(RTS)和亚马逊石质稀树草原飞地(RAS)的石质稀树草原inselberg木本群落的植物区系组成和多样性,并探讨了土壤性质的影响。还对两个研究群落与塞拉多-亚马逊过渡附近的其他两个岩石稀树草原群落进行了植物区系比较。对每个群落25个20 × 20 m样地(1 ha)的植物区系和土壤理化性质进行了采样和地理参考。两个群落间存在明显的区系差异,相似值较低,指示种较多。观察和估计的物种丰富度和群落多样性曲线表明,RAS群落的物种多样性低于RTS群落。土壤被发现是石质的,排水不良的,营养不良的,酸质的,极酸性的,沙质的和营养贫乏的。两种群落的物种组成和丰度与土壤性质有关。RTS和RAS之间物种组成和多样性的明显差异似乎是由土壤性质、地理隔离以及塞拉多和亚马逊的植物区系影响所决定的。这些结果拓宽了人们对亚马孙飞地和塞拉多平原热带稀树草原木本植物组成和多样性的认识,并为石质稀树草原植物地理学提供了一套重要的区系和地学描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hidrogel associado a níveis de umidade do solo no cultivo de Eucalyptus urograndis Caracterização energética de biomassas agrícolas e florestais no estado de Pernambuco Aplicações da fibra de Guadua weberbaeuri: uma revisão sistemática sob a ótica da construção civil, entre os anos de 2017 a 2022 Crescimento de mudas de Eucalyptus urophylla produzidas em bandejas coletoras de água e convencional nos sistemas de tubetes degradáveis e polipropileno Fungos micorrízicos arbusculares nativos ou exóticos em mudas de angico e braúna
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1