A comparison between the effect of oxytocin only and oxytocin plus propranolol on the labor: A double blind randomized trial

M. Kashanian, Zahra Zarrin
{"title":"A comparison between the effect of oxytocin only and oxytocin plus propranolol on the labor: A double blind randomized trial","authors":"M. Kashanian, Zahra Zarrin","doi":"10.1097/01.OGX.0000334692.42853.C2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of the present study is the comparison between the effect of oxytocin alone or in combination with propranolol on the labor. Materials & Methods : A double blind randomized controlled trial was performed on 150 nuliparas with gestational age of 39-41 weeks of pregnancy and Bishop score of ≤5, singleton, and cephalic presentation. The patients were randomly assigned in two groups. In the first group (oxytocin group=75), oxytocin was started at the rate of 2 mIu/ml and increased to a dose of 2 mIu/ml every 15 minutes until desired contractions were obtained Then it was continued at this rate for 8 hours. If the patients entered the active phase of labor, induction would be continued until delivery otherwise, the induction would be discontinued and patients would be transferred to the pre-labor ward, and on the next day, the protocol was performed again, unless patients were entered the active phase and deliver, cesarean would be performed. In the second group (propranolol group=75 cases), before the beginning of oxytoicn, 2mg propranolol was slowly injected intravenously then the oxytocin was initiated similar to the previous group and, in the second day of induction, before beginning of oxytocin, a 2mg propranolol was injected intravenously again and inductions were performed completely like the other group. Results: There were no statistically significant difference between the two groups according to maternal and gestational age, primary Bishop score and neonatal birth weight. The number of patients who delivered at the first day did not show statistically significant difference between the two groups. [54 (72%) patients in Oxytocin group vs 62(82.6%) patients in propranolol group]. The mean duration for obtaining good contractions was shorter in propranolol group in the both first and second day of induction (2.59±0.87 h vs 3.7±2 h, p=0.000 for the first day and 1.8±1 h vs 3.9±0.89 h, p Conclusion: Propranolol may shorten the induction duration and labor and reduce the amount of necessary oxytocin.","PeriodicalId":32133,"journal":{"name":"Fiyz","volume":"147 1","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiyz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OGX.0000334692.42853.C2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study is the comparison between the effect of oxytocin alone or in combination with propranolol on the labor. Materials & Methods : A double blind randomized controlled trial was performed on 150 nuliparas with gestational age of 39-41 weeks of pregnancy and Bishop score of ≤5, singleton, and cephalic presentation. The patients were randomly assigned in two groups. In the first group (oxytocin group=75), oxytocin was started at the rate of 2 mIu/ml and increased to a dose of 2 mIu/ml every 15 minutes until desired contractions were obtained Then it was continued at this rate for 8 hours. If the patients entered the active phase of labor, induction would be continued until delivery otherwise, the induction would be discontinued and patients would be transferred to the pre-labor ward, and on the next day, the protocol was performed again, unless patients were entered the active phase and deliver, cesarean would be performed. In the second group (propranolol group=75 cases), before the beginning of oxytoicn, 2mg propranolol was slowly injected intravenously then the oxytocin was initiated similar to the previous group and, in the second day of induction, before beginning of oxytocin, a 2mg propranolol was injected intravenously again and inductions were performed completely like the other group. Results: There were no statistically significant difference between the two groups according to maternal and gestational age, primary Bishop score and neonatal birth weight. The number of patients who delivered at the first day did not show statistically significant difference between the two groups. [54 (72%) patients in Oxytocin group vs 62(82.6%) patients in propranolol group]. The mean duration for obtaining good contractions was shorter in propranolol group in the both first and second day of induction (2.59±0.87 h vs 3.7±2 h, p=0.000 for the first day and 1.8±1 h vs 3.9±0.89 h, p Conclusion: Propranolol may shorten the induction duration and labor and reduce the amount of necessary oxytocin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双盲随机对照试验:单纯使用催产素与催产素加心得安对产程的影响
背景:本研究的目的是比较催产素单独或联合心得安对分娩的影响。材料与方法:对150例胎龄39 ~ 41周、Bishop评分≤5分、单胎、头位的新生儿进行双盲随机对照试验。患者被随机分为两组。在第一组(催产素组=75)中,催产素以2 mIu/ml的剂量开始,每15分钟增加到2 mIu/ml的剂量,直到获得所需的收缩,然后以该速度持续8小时。若患者进入产程活跃期,则继续引产至分娩,否则停止引产,将患者转移至产前病房,并于第二天再次执行该方案,除非患者进入产程活跃期并分娩,否则进行剖宫产。第二组(心得安组=75例),在催产素开始前,与前一组相同,缓慢静脉注射心得安2mg,然后启动催产素,在诱导第2天,在催产素开始前,再次静脉注射心得安2mg,完全进行诱导。结果:两组产妇胎龄、初级主教评分、新生儿出生体重比较,差异均无统计学意义。第一天分娩的患者数量在两组间无统计学差异。[催产素组54例(72%)vs心得安组62例(82.6%)]。心得安组在引产第1天和第2天获得良好宫缩的平均时间较短(2.59±0.87 h vs 3.7±2 h, p=0.000), 1.8±1 h vs 3.9±0.89 h, p结论:心得安可缩短引产时间和产程,减少催产素用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biochemical and pathological study of protective effect of Vitamin A in Azathioprine - induced hepatotoxicity in Rat A comparison between the effect of oxytocin only and oxytocin plus propranolol on the labor: A double blind randomized trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1