Academic Undermatch: How General and Specific Cultural Capital Structure Inequality†

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Forum Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.1111/SOCF.12322
Denise Deutschlander
{"title":"Academic Undermatch: How General and Specific Cultural Capital Structure Inequality†","authors":"Denise Deutschlander","doi":"10.1111/SOCF.12322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent literature has added another dimension to the well-documented patterns of social class inequality in education: academic undermatch. Undermatch (which occurs when students attend institutions of lower selectivity than they are academically qualified to attend) is both widespread and unequal, with students from less advantaged families more likely to undermatch. Although proliferating, the research on undermatch has focused primarily on documenting the extent of, and less on exploring the mechanisms underlying, undermatch. Moreover, this literature has developed largely independent of the sociological research on cultural capital. Therefore, when scholars consider underlying mechanisms, they often focus narrowly on college-specific information, without considering the broader cultural context in which students are embedded. Drawing on the literature on undermatch, as well as the sociological research on cultural capital, I differentiate between general and specific cultural capital. Moreover, instead of simply estimating whether students undermatch or not, I consider different types of undermatch. Results from the Educational Longitudinal Survey reveal that the effects of cultural capital are indeed heterogeneous, both with respect to its relationship to undermatch and its contribution to social class inequality. Findings have important implications for understanding undermatch and the role of cultural capital in reducing and reproducing social inequality.","PeriodicalId":21904,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Forum","volume":"32 1","pages":"162-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/SOCF.12322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Recent literature has added another dimension to the well-documented patterns of social class inequality in education: academic undermatch. Undermatch (which occurs when students attend institutions of lower selectivity than they are academically qualified to attend) is both widespread and unequal, with students from less advantaged families more likely to undermatch. Although proliferating, the research on undermatch has focused primarily on documenting the extent of, and less on exploring the mechanisms underlying, undermatch. Moreover, this literature has developed largely independent of the sociological research on cultural capital. Therefore, when scholars consider underlying mechanisms, they often focus narrowly on college-specific information, without considering the broader cultural context in which students are embedded. Drawing on the literature on undermatch, as well as the sociological research on cultural capital, I differentiate between general and specific cultural capital. Moreover, instead of simply estimating whether students undermatch or not, I consider different types of undermatch. Results from the Educational Longitudinal Survey reveal that the effects of cultural capital are indeed heterogeneous, both with respect to its relationship to undermatch and its contribution to social class inequality. Findings have important implications for understanding undermatch and the role of cultural capital in reducing and reproducing social inequality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术劣势:文化资本结构不平等的普遍性与特殊性
最近的文献为有充分证据的教育领域社会阶级不平等模式增加了另一个维度:学术劣势。不匹配(当学生就读于比他们的学术能力更低的学校时发生)既普遍又不平等,来自弱势家庭的学生更有可能不匹配。尽管不匹配的研究越来越多,但研究主要集中在记录不匹配的程度,而不是探索不匹配的潜在机制。此外,这些文献的发展在很大程度上独立于文化资本的社会学研究。因此,当学者们考虑潜在的机制时,他们往往只关注大学特有的信息,而没有考虑学生所处的更广泛的文化背景。通过对undermatch的文献研究,以及对文化资本的社会学研究,我区分了一般文化资本和特定文化资本。此外,我不是简单地估计学生是否不匹配,而是考虑不同类型的不匹配。教育纵向调查的结果显示,文化资本的影响确实是异质的,无论是在其与不匹配的关系方面,还是在其对社会阶级不平等的贡献方面。研究结果对理解不匹配和文化资本在减少和再现社会不平等中的作用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Forum
Sociological Forum SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Sociological Forum is the flagship journal of the Eastern Sociological Society. The journal is peer reviewed and committed to publishing high quality, cutting edge research on substantive issues of fundamental importance to the study of society. The journal"s mission is broad in scope, encompassing empirical works (both quantitative and qualitative in nature), as well as works that develop theories, concepts, and methodological strategies. All areas of sociology and related fields are welcomed in Sociological Forum, as the journal strives to create a site of learning and exchange for scholars and students of the social sciences.
期刊最新文献
Micropolitics in School-Based Health Centers' Provision of Sexual Health Services. Workplace Discrimination and Older Black Women's Mental Health: An Examination of Relational Support-Strain Processes. Kids in limbo: War, uncertainty, and the school experiences of Ukrainian refugee students in Poland Know your place: Fractured epistemic privilege among women in state organizations Dividing paradise: Rural inequality and the diminishing American dream By JenniferSherman, Oakland, CA: University of California Press. 2021. pp. 288. $29.95 (pbk). ISBN: 9780520305137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1