Evaluation of Efficacy of Metoclopramide, Dexamethasone and Their Combination for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.26502/acc.001
M. Rasheed, Arindam Sarkar, V. Arora
{"title":"Evaluation of Efficacy of Metoclopramide, Dexamethasone and Their Combination for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section","authors":"M. Rasheed, Arindam Sarkar, V. Arora","doi":"10.26502/acc.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nausea and/or vomiting following regional anaesthesia in pregnant females undergoing caesarean section is a major clinical problem. This study was conducted to compared the efficacy of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and their combination for preventing intra operative & post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following spinal anaesthesia given for caesarean section in patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 full term pregnant females of ASA I & II grade with uncomplicated pregnancies were included in this prospective randomized double blind study. Patients were randomly allocated to three groups. The group D (n= 40) received 8 mg dexamethasone, group M (n=40) received10 mg of metoclopramide while group D+M (n= 40) received 8 mg dexamethasone along with10 mg of metoclopramide intravenously immediately before administration of spinal anaesthesia. Intraoperative and post operative emetic episodes (nausea, retching, and vomiting) was noted as well as any other adverse effects. Results: During intraoperative period all parturients had PONV score 0. Postoperatively at first hour number of full responders in group D, M and D+M were 29/40 (72.5%), 30/40 (75%), 38/40 (95%) and the difference was statistically significant (Group D Vs Group D+ M, P value -0.013 and Group M Vs Group D+ M, P value-0.025). At 3rd hour postoperatively 9 patients in Group D, 8 patients in Group M and 1 in Group D+ M, had PONV score 1 (Group D Vs Group D+ M, P value -0.014 and Group M Vs Group D+ M, P value-0.029). No patient had any vomiting episodes over the time period of 24 hrs. Conclusion: Combined use of dexamethasone and metoclopramide as a prophylactic antiemetic was significantly better for the prevention of PONV as compared to the use of dexamethasone and metoclopramide alone.","PeriodicalId":41147,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care Journal","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/acc.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Nausea and/or vomiting following regional anaesthesia in pregnant females undergoing caesarean section is a major clinical problem. This study was conducted to compared the efficacy of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and their combination for preventing intra operative & post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following spinal anaesthesia given for caesarean section in patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 full term pregnant females of ASA I & II grade with uncomplicated pregnancies were included in this prospective randomized double blind study. Patients were randomly allocated to three groups. The group D (n= 40) received 8 mg dexamethasone, group M (n=40) received10 mg of metoclopramide while group D+M (n= 40) received 8 mg dexamethasone along with10 mg of metoclopramide intravenously immediately before administration of spinal anaesthesia. Intraoperative and post operative emetic episodes (nausea, retching, and vomiting) was noted as well as any other adverse effects. Results: During intraoperative period all parturients had PONV score 0. Postoperatively at first hour number of full responders in group D, M and D+M were 29/40 (72.5%), 30/40 (75%), 38/40 (95%) and the difference was statistically significant (Group D Vs Group D+ M, P value -0.013 and Group M Vs Group D+ M, P value-0.025). At 3rd hour postoperatively 9 patients in Group D, 8 patients in Group M and 1 in Group D+ M, had PONV score 1 (Group D Vs Group D+ M, P value -0.014 and Group M Vs Group D+ M, P value-0.029). No patient had any vomiting episodes over the time period of 24 hrs. Conclusion: Combined use of dexamethasone and metoclopramide as a prophylactic antiemetic was significantly better for the prevention of PONV as compared to the use of dexamethasone and metoclopramide alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲氧氯普胺、地塞米松及其联用预防剖宫产术后恶心呕吐的疗效评价
背景:剖宫产孕妇区域麻醉后恶心和/或呕吐是一个主要的临床问题。本研究比较了甲氧氯普胺、地塞米松及其联用预防剖宫产脊柱麻醉患者术中及术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的疗效。材料与方法:本前瞻性随机双盲研究纳入120例无并发症的ASA I级和II级足月妊娠女性。患者被随机分为三组。D组(n=40)给予地塞米松8 mg, M组(n=40)给予甲氧氯普胺10 mg, D+M组(n=40)在脊髓麻醉前立即静脉给予地塞米松8 mg,甲氧氯普胺10 mg。术中和术后呕吐(恶心、干呕和呕吐)以及任何其他不良反应均被注意到。结果:术中所有患者PONV评分均为0分。D组、M组和D+M组术后1小时完全缓解者分别为29/40(72.5%)、30/40(75%)、38/40(95%),差异均有统计学意义(D组Vs D+M组,P值-0.013;M组Vs D+M组,P值0.025)。术后3 h, D组9例,M组8例,D+ M组1例,PONV评分为1 (D组Vs D+ M组,P值为-0.014,M组Vs D+ M组,P值为0.029)。24小时内无患者呕吐。结论:预防性止吐药地塞米松联合甲氧氯普胺预防PONV的效果明显优于单用地塞米松和甲氧氯普胺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant with Lignocaine Adrenaline and Bupivacaine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Limb Surgery Effect of Prolonged Preoperative Fasting on Intraoperative Glycaemia in Pediatric Surgery at the Essos-Cameroun Hospital Center (Cameroon) Comparison between two Different Doses of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia among Geriatric Patients in Hemiarthroplasty Surgery Combination of Entropy and Electroencephalograpy for Deep of Hypnosis Monitoring Improvement during General Anesthesia Comparison of Adverse Effects Related To the Use of Epidural Anesthesia versus Spinal Anesthesia In Cesarean Section Patients At The Plaza De La Salud General Hospital In Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, During The Period January-December 2021: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1