Compressed Dimension of Reservoir Models Uncertainty Parameters for Optimized Model Calibration and History Matching Process

A. Al-Turki, Obai Alnajjar, M. Baddourah, B. Moriwawon
{"title":"Compressed Dimension of Reservoir Models Uncertainty Parameters for Optimized Model Calibration and History Matching Process","authors":"A. Al-Turki, Obai Alnajjar, M. Baddourah, B. Moriwawon","doi":"10.2118/206066-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The algorithms and workflows have been developed to couple efficient model parameterization with stochastic, global optimization using a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) for global history matching, and coupled with an advanced workflow for streamline sensitivity-based inversion for fine-tuning. During parameterization the low-rank subsets of most influencing reservoir parameters are identified and propagated to MOGA to perform the field-level history match. Data misfits between the field historical data and simulation data are calculated with multiple realizations of reservoir models that quantify and capture reservoir uncertainty. Each generation of the optimization algorithms reduces the data misfit relative to the previous iteration. This iterative process continues until a satisfactory field-level history match is reached or there are no further improvements. The fine-tuning process of well-connectivity calibration is then performed with a streamlined sensitivity-based inversion algorithm to locally update the model to reduce well-level mismatch.\n In this study, an application of the proposed algorithms and workflow is demonstrated for model calibration and history matching. The synthetic reservoir model used in this study is discretized into millions of grid cells with hundreds of producer and injector wells. It is designed to generate several decades of production and injection history to evaluate and demonstrate the workflow. In field-level history matching, reservoir rock properties (e.g., permeability, fault transmissibility, etc.) are parameterized to conduct the global match of pressure and production rates. Grid Connectivity Transform (GCT) was used and assessed to parameterize the reservoir properties. In addition, the convergence rate and history match quality of MOGA was assessed during the field (global) history matching. Also, the effectiveness of the streamline-based inversion was evaluated by quantifying the additional improvement in history matching quality per well.\n The developed parametrization and optimization algorithms and workflows revealed the unique features of each of the algorithms for model calibration and history matching. This integrated workflow has successfully defined and carried uncertainty throughout the history matching process. Following the successful field-level history match, the well-level history matching was conducted using streamline sensitivity-based inversion, which further improved the history match quality and conditioned the model to historical production and injection data. In general, the workflow results in enhanced history match quality in a shorter turnaround time. The geological realism of the model is retained for robust prediction and development planning.","PeriodicalId":10896,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, September 21, 2021","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, September 21, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206066-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The algorithms and workflows have been developed to couple efficient model parameterization with stochastic, global optimization using a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) for global history matching, and coupled with an advanced workflow for streamline sensitivity-based inversion for fine-tuning. During parameterization the low-rank subsets of most influencing reservoir parameters are identified and propagated to MOGA to perform the field-level history match. Data misfits between the field historical data and simulation data are calculated with multiple realizations of reservoir models that quantify and capture reservoir uncertainty. Each generation of the optimization algorithms reduces the data misfit relative to the previous iteration. This iterative process continues until a satisfactory field-level history match is reached or there are no further improvements. The fine-tuning process of well-connectivity calibration is then performed with a streamlined sensitivity-based inversion algorithm to locally update the model to reduce well-level mismatch. In this study, an application of the proposed algorithms and workflow is demonstrated for model calibration and history matching. The synthetic reservoir model used in this study is discretized into millions of grid cells with hundreds of producer and injector wells. It is designed to generate several decades of production and injection history to evaluate and demonstrate the workflow. In field-level history matching, reservoir rock properties (e.g., permeability, fault transmissibility, etc.) are parameterized to conduct the global match of pressure and production rates. Grid Connectivity Transform (GCT) was used and assessed to parameterize the reservoir properties. In addition, the convergence rate and history match quality of MOGA was assessed during the field (global) history matching. Also, the effectiveness of the streamline-based inversion was evaluated by quantifying the additional improvement in history matching quality per well. The developed parametrization and optimization algorithms and workflows revealed the unique features of each of the algorithms for model calibration and history matching. This integrated workflow has successfully defined and carried uncertainty throughout the history matching process. Following the successful field-level history match, the well-level history matching was conducted using streamline sensitivity-based inversion, which further improved the history match quality and conditioned the model to historical production and injection data. In general, the workflow results in enhanced history match quality in a shorter turnaround time. The geological realism of the model is retained for robust prediction and development planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
储层模型不确定参数的压缩维数优化模型标定和历史拟合过程
该算法和工作流程将有效的模型参数化与随机全局优化相结合,使用多目标遗传算法(MOGA)进行全局历史匹配,并与基于流线灵敏度的反演进行微调的先进工作流程相结合。在参数化过程中,识别出影响最大的储层参数的低阶子集,并将其传播到MOGA中进行油田级历史匹配。现场历史数据和模拟数据之间的数据不匹配是通过量化和捕获油藏不确定性的油藏模型的多种实现来计算的。每一代优化算法相对于前一代迭代减少了数据不拟合。这个迭代过程一直持续,直到达到令人满意的油田级历史匹配,或者没有进一步的改进。然后,利用基于灵敏度的简化反演算法进行井连通性校准的微调过程,以局部更新模型,以减少井位失配。在本研究中,演示了所提出的算法和工作流程在模型校准和历史匹配中的应用。本研究中使用的合成油藏模型被离散成数百万个网格单元,其中包含数百口生产井和注入井。它旨在生成几十年的生产和注入历史,以评估和演示工作流程。在油田历史拟合中,将储层岩石性质(如渗透率、断层渗透率等)参数化,以实现压力和产量的全局拟合。利用网格连通性变换(GCT)对储层物性进行参数化。此外,在现场(全局)历史匹配过程中,评价了MOGA的收敛速度和历史匹配质量。此外,通过量化每口井历史匹配质量的额外改进,评估了基于流线的反演的有效性。所开发的参数化和优化算法和工作流程揭示了每种算法在模型校准和历史匹配方面的独特性。该集成工作流在整个历史匹配过程中成功地定义和携带了不确定性。在油田级历史匹配成功之后,采用基于流线灵敏度的反演方法进行井级历史匹配,进一步提高了历史匹配质量,并使模型适应历史生产和注入数据。一般来说,工作流可以在更短的周转时间内提高历史匹配质量。该模型的地质真实性被保留,用于稳健的预测和开发规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pollination Inspired Clustering Model for Wireless Sensor Network Optimization Three Phase Coil based Optimized Wireless Charging System for Electric Vehicles Wireless Power Transfer Device Based on RF Energy Circuit and Transformer Coupling Procedure Hybrid Micro-Energy Harvesting Model using WSN for Self-Sustainable Wireless Mobile Charging Application Automated Multimodal Fusion Technique for the Classification of Human Brain on Alzheimer’s Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1