Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Bacteria in Pus Samples of Last Three Years at Chaghi Laboratory, Quetta, Pakistan

{"title":"Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Bacteria in Pus Samples of Last Three Years at Chaghi Laboratory, Quetta, Pakistan","authors":"","doi":"10.26692/surj-ss.v54i04.4313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibiotic resistance develops and spreads among pyogenic bacteria as a result of injudicious antibiotic usage in the treatment of pyogenic illnesses. Significant gaps in research on antibiotic resistance in Quetta, Pakistan have been observed making it difficult to develop trendlines and resistance patterns that can contribute to fighting the dangers associated with the rise of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to determine the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates obtained from pus samples. A retrospective analysis was carried on regular pus specimens collected at the Chaghi laboratory in Quetta from January 2018 to December, 2020. A total of 259 specimens were examined for antibiotic susceptibility patterns, with Ciprofloxacin (85.7 %), Cephradine (78.4 %), Ofloxacin (77.6 %), and Augmentin (56%) having the greatest proportion of resistance. All S. aureus strains were vancomycin-sensitive (100%) and Ampicillin-resistant (98.6%), while all gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to Imipenem (97.9%) and Tazobactam (90%) however resistant to Ampicillin (98.6%). A gradual increase in antibiotic resistance was observed among gram-negative isolates and a notable increase in resistance was observed by S. aureus. S. aureus was shown to be the most frequent bacteria in pus samples, followed by K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa. We concluded that antibiotic overuse should be avoided to prevent emerging resistance. Regular surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility patterns also aids in the development of improved treatment options for reducing morbidity and death by recognizing the real burden of antibiotic resistance in an organism and preventing its spread.","PeriodicalId":21635,"journal":{"name":"SINDH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL -SCIENCE SERIES","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SINDH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL -SCIENCE SERIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26692/surj-ss.v54i04.4313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance develops and spreads among pyogenic bacteria as a result of injudicious antibiotic usage in the treatment of pyogenic illnesses. Significant gaps in research on antibiotic resistance in Quetta, Pakistan have been observed making it difficult to develop trendlines and resistance patterns that can contribute to fighting the dangers associated with the rise of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to determine the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates obtained from pus samples. A retrospective analysis was carried on regular pus specimens collected at the Chaghi laboratory in Quetta from January 2018 to December, 2020. A total of 259 specimens were examined for antibiotic susceptibility patterns, with Ciprofloxacin (85.7 %), Cephradine (78.4 %), Ofloxacin (77.6 %), and Augmentin (56%) having the greatest proportion of resistance. All S. aureus strains were vancomycin-sensitive (100%) and Ampicillin-resistant (98.6%), while all gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to Imipenem (97.9%) and Tazobactam (90%) however resistant to Ampicillin (98.6%). A gradual increase in antibiotic resistance was observed among gram-negative isolates and a notable increase in resistance was observed by S. aureus. S. aureus was shown to be the most frequent bacteria in pus samples, followed by K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa. We concluded that antibiotic overuse should be avoided to prevent emerging resistance. Regular surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility patterns also aids in the development of improved treatment options for reducing morbidity and death by recognizing the real burden of antibiotic resistance in an organism and preventing its spread.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦奎达Chaghi实验室近3年脓液样品细菌药敏模式评价
抗生素耐药性在化脓性细菌中发展和传播是治疗化脓性疾病时不明智地使用抗生素的结果。据观察,巴基斯坦奎达的抗生素耐药性研究存在重大差距,因此难以制定趋势线和耐药性模式,从而有助于抗击与抗菌素耐药性上升有关的危险。本研究的目的是确定从脓液样本中获得的细菌分离株的抗生素敏感性模式。对2018年1月至2020年12月在奎达查吉实验室采集的常规脓液标本进行回顾性分析。共检查259份标本的抗生素敏感性,其中环丙沙星(85.7%)、头孢拉定(78.4%)、氧氟沙星(77.6%)和奥格门汀(56%)耐药比例最大。所有金黄色葡萄球菌对万古霉素敏感(100%),对氨苄西林耐药(98.6%),革兰氏阴性菌对亚胺培南和他唑巴坦敏感(97.9%),对氨苄西林耐药(98.6%)。革兰氏阴性菌株对抗生素的耐药性逐渐增加,金黄色葡萄球菌对抗生素的耐药性明显增加。金黄色葡萄球菌是脓液样本中最常见的细菌,其次是肺炎克雷伯菌、大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌。我们的结论是,应避免过度使用抗生素,以防止出现耐药性。对抗生素敏感性模式的定期监测还有助于制定更好的治疗方案,通过认识到生物体中抗生素耐药性的真正负担并防止其传播,从而减少发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structural Analysis of Ranikot Anticline, Southern Kirthar Fold Belt, Pakistan Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Bacteria in Pus Samples of Last Three Years at Chaghi Laboratory, Quetta, Pakistan Bioaccumulation of two macro-elements (Sodium and Potassium) in relation to body size and condition factor of Notopterus chitala from River Indus, Ghazi Ghat, Pakistan An Estimation of the Land Surface Temperature, Derived from the Landsat Satellite, for the Major Cities in Sindh Province, Pakistan The Screening of Pakistani Wheat Landraces to Stem Rust (Puccinia gramminis f. sp. tritici) resistance under field conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1