Population estimation of Asiatic black bear in the Himalayan Region of India using camera traps

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY Ursus Pub Date : 2022-07-06 DOI:10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00002.2
A. Bhattacharya, N. Chatterjee, Kunal Angrish, Dharamveer Meena, B. Sinha, B. Habib
{"title":"Population estimation of Asiatic black bear in the Himalayan Region of India using camera traps","authors":"A. Bhattacharya, N. Chatterjee, Kunal Angrish, Dharamveer Meena, B. Sinha, B. Habib","doi":"10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00002.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Robust population estimation of rare or elusive threatened species lacking distinct identifiable features poses a challenge in the field of conservation and management. The Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) is one such species. Methodological frameworks—such as radiotelemetry, genetic sampling, and camera-trapping—though crucial and advantageous, sometimes require additional information through invasive methods for individual identification. In this study, we estimated the population density of Asiatic black bear in 2 protected areas in the Indian Himalayan Region without information on individual identification. We conducted the study through a spatial capture–recapture framework using camera traps in the summer during May–July 2018 in Daranghati Wildlife Sanctuary (WLS) and May–July 2019 in Rupi Bhaba WLS. Using the recently developed Spatial Presence–Absence model, we estimated g0 (detection probability), σ (scale or movement parameter related to home range of the species), and N (population size) of Asiatic black bears from the camera-trap data using a Bayesian framework. We estimated a population density of 2.5 individuals/100 km2 (95% Credible Interval = 1.42–9.63 individuals/100 km2) from Daranghati WLS and 0.3 individuals/100 km2 (95% Credible Interval = 0.2–0.7 individuals/100 km2) from Rupi Bhaba WLS. Abundance estimates produced by extrapolating these densities were 11 Asiatic black bear individuals (95% Credible Interval = 4–27) from Daranghati WLS and 2 Asiatic black bear individuals (95% Credible Interval = 1–3) from Rupi Bhaba WLS. This is the first population estimate of Asiatic black bear from the Indian Himalaya without individual identification. We recommend that this method, which provides minimal sampling bias and ease of sampling, can be replicated in other mountainous landscapes for a robust density estimation of this species.","PeriodicalId":49393,"journal":{"name":"Ursus","volume":"16 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ursus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00002.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Robust population estimation of rare or elusive threatened species lacking distinct identifiable features poses a challenge in the field of conservation and management. The Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) is one such species. Methodological frameworks—such as radiotelemetry, genetic sampling, and camera-trapping—though crucial and advantageous, sometimes require additional information through invasive methods for individual identification. In this study, we estimated the population density of Asiatic black bear in 2 protected areas in the Indian Himalayan Region without information on individual identification. We conducted the study through a spatial capture–recapture framework using camera traps in the summer during May–July 2018 in Daranghati Wildlife Sanctuary (WLS) and May–July 2019 in Rupi Bhaba WLS. Using the recently developed Spatial Presence–Absence model, we estimated g0 (detection probability), σ (scale or movement parameter related to home range of the species), and N (population size) of Asiatic black bears from the camera-trap data using a Bayesian framework. We estimated a population density of 2.5 individuals/100 km2 (95% Credible Interval = 1.42–9.63 individuals/100 km2) from Daranghati WLS and 0.3 individuals/100 km2 (95% Credible Interval = 0.2–0.7 individuals/100 km2) from Rupi Bhaba WLS. Abundance estimates produced by extrapolating these densities were 11 Asiatic black bear individuals (95% Credible Interval = 4–27) from Daranghati WLS and 2 Asiatic black bear individuals (95% Credible Interval = 1–3) from Rupi Bhaba WLS. This is the first population estimate of Asiatic black bear from the Indian Himalaya without individual identification. We recommend that this method, which provides minimal sampling bias and ease of sampling, can be replicated in other mountainous landscapes for a robust density estimation of this species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用相机陷阱估计印度喜马拉雅地区亚洲黑熊的数量
摘要/ Abstract摘要:对缺乏明显可识别特征的珍稀或难以捉摸的濒危物种进行稳健的种群估计是保护和管理领域的一个挑战。亚洲黑熊(Ursus thibetanus)就是这样一个物种。方法框架——如无线电遥测、基因采样和摄像机捕捉——虽然至关重要和有利,但有时需要通过侵入性方法获得额外的信息来进行个体识别。本研究在没有个体鉴定信息的情况下,对印度喜马拉雅地区2个保护区的亚洲黑熊种群密度进行了估算。我们于2018年5月至7月在达朗哈蒂野生动物保护区(WLS)和2019年5月至7月在鲁比巴野生动物保护区(Rupi Bhaba WLS)通过使用相机陷阱的空间捕捉-再捕捉框架进行了研究。利用新近建立的空间存在-缺失模型,利用贝叶斯框架,从相机陷阱数据中估计了亚洲黑熊的探测概率(g0)、物种活动范围相关的尺度或运动参数(σ)和种群规模(N)。我们估计达朗哈蒂湿地的种群密度为2.5只/100 km2(95%可信区间为1.42 ~ 9.63只/100 km2),鲁比巴巴湿地的种群密度为0.3只/100 km2(95%可信区间为0.2 ~ 0.7只/100 km2)。通过外推这些密度得出的丰度估计是,来自达朗哈蒂野生动植物保护区的11只亚洲黑熊(95%可信区间= 4-27)和来自鲁比巴哈巴野生动植物保护区的2只亚洲黑熊(95%可信区间= 1-3)。这是印度喜马拉雅地区第一个没有个体鉴定的亚洲黑熊种群估计。我们建议这种方法可以在其他山地景观中复制,以提供最小的采样偏差和方便的采样,以获得该物种的可靠密度估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ursus
Ursus 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ursus includes a variety of articles on all aspects of bear management and research worldwide. Original manuscripts are welcome. In addition to manuscripts reporting original research, submissions may be based on thoughtful review and synthesis of previously-reported information, innovative philosophies and opinions, and public policy or legal aspects of wildlife conservation. Notes of general interest are also welcome. Invited manuscripts will be clearly identified, but will still be subject to peer review. All manuscripts must be in English. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed, and subject to rigorous editorial standards.
期刊最新文献
Brown bear food habits in natural and human-modified landscapes in West-European Russia Escaping heat and anthropogenic pressures? Asiatic black bear denning behavior in its westernmost global range Interactions between brown bear cubs of different mothers in Kashmir, India Social network analysis uncovers hidden social complexity in giant pandas Survey on gastro-intestinal parasites of captive sun bears in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1