Multiple College Applications.

A. G. Bean, J. Centra
{"title":"Multiple College Applications.","authors":"A. G. Bean, J. Centra","doi":"10.1002/J.2333-8504.1970.TB00171.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A sample of 18,601 Virginia high school seniors was used to gather information regarding multiple college application practices. Approximately 35% of the college applicants filed one application, 26% filed two applications, 24% filed three applications and 16% filed four or more applications. Eighty-five percent of the students who filed one application were accepted, while 91% of the four or more application group were accepted by at least one of their first three college choices. \n \n \n \nDiscriminant analysis was used to describe the academic characteristics of students filing multiple applications and to determine how these academic characteristics were related to college acceptance. Students who filed multiple applications tended to have higher SAT scores; however, they performed less well in high school than would be predicted from their SAT scores. High school performance appeared to be less important for females in gaining admission than it was for males. \n \n \n \nThe findings of this study contradict the popular beliefs that most college applicants file three or more applications and that more applications are filed by students with low academic ability.","PeriodicalId":15458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Personnel","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Personnel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2333-8504.1970.TB00171.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A sample of 18,601 Virginia high school seniors was used to gather information regarding multiple college application practices. Approximately 35% of the college applicants filed one application, 26% filed two applications, 24% filed three applications and 16% filed four or more applications. Eighty-five percent of the students who filed one application were accepted, while 91% of the four or more application group were accepted by at least one of their first three college choices. Discriminant analysis was used to describe the academic characteristics of students filing multiple applications and to determine how these academic characteristics were related to college acceptance. Students who filed multiple applications tended to have higher SAT scores; however, they performed less well in high school than would be predicted from their SAT scores. High school performance appeared to be less important for females in gaining admission than it was for males. The findings of this study contradict the popular beliefs that most college applicants file three or more applications and that more applications are filed by students with low academic ability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多所大学申请。
18601名弗吉尼亚高中毕业生的样本被用来收集有关多个大学申请实践的信息。大约35%的大学申请者提交了一份申请,26%提交了两份申请,24%提交了三份申请,16%提交了四份或更多申请。提交一份申请的学生中有85%被录取,而提交四份或更多申请的学生中有91%被前三所大学中的至少一所录取。我们使用判别分析来描述提交多份申请的学生的学术特征,并确定这些学术特征与大学录取的关系。提交多份申请的学生往往SAT分数更高;然而,他们在高中的表现不如他们的SAT成绩所预测的那样好。与男性相比,高中成绩对女性的录取似乎没有那么重要。这项研究的结果与人们普遍认为的大多数大学申请者提交三份或更多的申请,并且更多的申请是由学习能力差的学生提交的这一观点相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Developmental View of Academic Advising As Teaching. The Implications of Rank-Ordering on the Clark-Trow Typology. On the Campus. Counseling for the Vietnam Veteran. Multiple College Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1