Study of the terms for performing procedures under the HTA of a medicinal product in Bulgaria for the period 04.2016-12.2018

Q4 Social Sciences Social Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.14748/SM.V27I3.7573
Anelia Nikolova, E. Grigorov
{"title":"Study of the terms for performing procedures under the HTA of a medicinal product in Bulgaria for the period 04.2016-12.2018","authors":"Anelia Nikolova, E. Grigorov","doi":"10.14748/SM.V27I3.7573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary activity that systematically assesses the effects of technology on health, on the availability and allocation of resources and their effectiveness for the health system. It is a dynamic, rapidly evolving process that helps make informed decisions about the benefits, risks and costs of introducing new technologies. The administrative terms for the HTA vary in different European countries and depend on the type of evaluation that is performed - single, multiple, rapid assessments and more. For Bulgaria, the statutory deadline for carrying out the procedure under the HTA according to Ordinance № 9 of 01.12.2015 is 90 days from the date of submission of the application by the Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH). Objective: To monitor and analyze the average duration of HTA procedures and the factors that affect it in order to assess whether the normatively determined term of 90 days is sufficient. Methodology: Monitoring, analysis and synthesis are applied for data extraction and interpretation of information about the submitted applications for HTA in National Center of Public Health and Analyses (NCPHA), as well as the overall organization of the process. Criteria for completeness and duration of the procedure are analyzed. Results: In the general case of conducting HTA, the practice shows that the normatively determined term is extremely insufficient. The leading reason for going beyond the time frame is the interval for convening and holding regular meetings of the Heath Technology Assessment Committee (HTAC). Other factors are the incomplete information in the submitted documents or the need to revise the reports. The analysis of the deadlines shows that the share of procedures completed on time is very small and decreases over the years. The longest terms are for procedures in the field of oncology, urology and hematology, and the shortest - in the field of dermatology, rheumatology and endocrinology. Conclusion: The normatively set term is insufficient and regardless of the efforts made, it was not observed in 90% of the implemented procedures. The average duration of a HTA procedure in Bulgaria in the analyzed period is about 156 days. The established practice shows that in the country the duration of HTA is close to the group of EU countries with an established term of 90-220 days.","PeriodicalId":38881,"journal":{"name":"Social Medicine","volume":"283 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14748/SM.V27I3.7573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary activity that systematically assesses the effects of technology on health, on the availability and allocation of resources and their effectiveness for the health system. It is a dynamic, rapidly evolving process that helps make informed decisions about the benefits, risks and costs of introducing new technologies. The administrative terms for the HTA vary in different European countries and depend on the type of evaluation that is performed - single, multiple, rapid assessments and more. For Bulgaria, the statutory deadline for carrying out the procedure under the HTA according to Ordinance № 9 of 01.12.2015 is 90 days from the date of submission of the application by the Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH). Objective: To monitor and analyze the average duration of HTA procedures and the factors that affect it in order to assess whether the normatively determined term of 90 days is sufficient. Methodology: Monitoring, analysis and synthesis are applied for data extraction and interpretation of information about the submitted applications for HTA in National Center of Public Health and Analyses (NCPHA), as well as the overall organization of the process. Criteria for completeness and duration of the procedure are analyzed. Results: In the general case of conducting HTA, the practice shows that the normatively determined term is extremely insufficient. The leading reason for going beyond the time frame is the interval for convening and holding regular meetings of the Heath Technology Assessment Committee (HTAC). Other factors are the incomplete information in the submitted documents or the need to revise the reports. The analysis of the deadlines shows that the share of procedures completed on time is very small and decreases over the years. The longest terms are for procedures in the field of oncology, urology and hematology, and the shortest - in the field of dermatology, rheumatology and endocrinology. Conclusion: The normatively set term is insufficient and regardless of the efforts made, it was not observed in 90% of the implemented procedures. The average duration of a HTA procedure in Bulgaria in the analyzed period is about 156 days. The established practice shows that in the country the duration of HTA is close to the group of EU countries with an established term of 90-220 days.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对2016年4月至2018年12月期间保加利亚药品HTA下执行程序的条款进行研究
卫生技术评估(HTA)是一项多学科活动,系统地评估技术对卫生、资源的可得性和分配及其对卫生系统的有效性的影响。这是一个动态的、快速发展的过程,有助于对引进新技术的收益、风险和成本做出明智的决定。HTA的管理术语在不同的欧洲国家有所不同,并取决于所进行的评估类型——单次、多次、快速评估等等。对于保加利亚,根据2015年12月1日第9号条例,在HTA下执行程序的法定截止日期是上市许可持有人(MAH)提交申请之日起90天。目的:监测和分析HTA手术的平均持续时间及其影响因素,以评价规范确定的90天是否足够。方法:监测、分析和综合应用于国家公共卫生和分析中心(NCPHA)关于HTA提交申请的数据提取和信息解释,以及整个过程的组织。分析了程序完备性和持续时间的标准。结果:在进行HTA的一般情况下,实践表明,规范确定的条件是极其不足的。超出时间框架的主要原因是召开和举行卫生技术评估委员会(HTAC)定期会议的间隔时间。其他因素包括提交的文件信息不完整或需要修改报告。对截止日期的分析表明,按时完成的程序所占比例很小,而且逐年减少。最长的是肿瘤学、泌尿学和血液学领域的手术,最短的是皮肤科、风湿病学和内分泌学领域的手术。结论:规范设定的期限不够充分,无论如何努力,90%的实施程序都不符合规定。在分析期间,保加利亚HTA程序的平均持续时间约为156天。根据既定的实践,该国的HTA期限接近欧盟国家集团,其既定期限为90-220天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Medicine
Social Medicine Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicina Social es un foro académico internacional con acceso abierto y revisión por pares destinado a la promoción y el desarrollo de la Medicina Social. La revista se escribe con la inventiva y la visión crítica y comprometida que animó a los fundadores de la Medicina Social. Para lograr esto: 1. Actuamos como foro de investigación y docencia respecto a las formas en las que los factores sociales no sólo influyen sobre la salud y la enfermedad sino que a su vez son modificados por las mismas. 2. Apoyamos los objetivos de Salud para Todos de Alma Ata y la visión holística de la salud contenida en la Carta de la OMS. 3. Producimos materiales científicamente calificados, intelectualmente honestos, libres de sesgos comerciales, claramente escritos y presentados. 4. Organizamos la revista de manera tal que refleje y apoye la diversa comunidad internacional que trabaja en el campo de la medicina social. Para realizar los objetivos de “Salud para Todos” debemos tener una revista que incluya todas las voces.
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Reimbursement Policies for Medical Products Through Health Technology Assessment Pharmacoeconomic analysis of medical abortion in Bulgaria A comparative study of mental health of medical students in two countries Study of the terms for performing procedures under the HTA of a medicinal product in Bulgaria for the period 04.2016-12.2018 Biological food safety and health policy in this field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1