Study on Prevention and Treatment Strategies for Pressure Injury in Operating Room

M. Shan, Li Wang, Wenjing Cui, Xiaoxin Fu
{"title":"Study on Prevention and Treatment Strategies for Pressure Injury in Operating Room","authors":"M. Shan, Li Wang, Wenjing Cui, Xiaoxin Fu","doi":"10.32629/jcmr.v4i2.1247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the prevention and treatment strategies for pressure injury in the operating room. Methods: 116 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2016 to May 2023 were selected as research subjects by random number method, and were randomly divided into the research group (n=58) and the control group (n=58). The control group was treated with conventional interventions, and the research group was treated with interventions in the operating room. The incidence of pressure injuries, pressure injury recovery scoring, SAS, and SDS scores were compared between the two groups. Results: After the intervention, the incidence of pressure injuries in the research group was lower than that in the control group, and the postoperative mobility and perception were better than those in the control group. In addition, the negative emotions such as anxiety and depression produced during the treatment of the patients in the research group were more effectively alleviated under intervention. The results of this study are statistically significant, with P < 0.05. Conclusion: Intervention measures can effectively alleviate the negative emotions produced during the treatment of patients, reduce the incidence of postoperative pressure injuries, alleviate the patient's pain and financial pressure, shorten the recovery time of patients, and improve the mobility and perception ability of patients after the occurrence of compression injuries.","PeriodicalId":15431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jcmr.v4i2.1247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the prevention and treatment strategies for pressure injury in the operating room. Methods: 116 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2016 to May 2023 were selected as research subjects by random number method, and were randomly divided into the research group (n=58) and the control group (n=58). The control group was treated with conventional interventions, and the research group was treated with interventions in the operating room. The incidence of pressure injuries, pressure injury recovery scoring, SAS, and SDS scores were compared between the two groups. Results: After the intervention, the incidence of pressure injuries in the research group was lower than that in the control group, and the postoperative mobility and perception were better than those in the control group. In addition, the negative emotions such as anxiety and depression produced during the treatment of the patients in the research group were more effectively alleviated under intervention. The results of this study are statistically significant, with P < 0.05. Conclusion: Intervention measures can effectively alleviate the negative emotions produced during the treatment of patients, reduce the incidence of postoperative pressure injuries, alleviate the patient's pain and financial pressure, shorten the recovery time of patients, and improve the mobility and perception ability of patients after the occurrence of compression injuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术室压伤的防治策略研究
目的:探讨手术室压伤的防治策略。方法:采用随机数法选取2016年1月至2023年5月在我院行手术治疗的116例患者作为研究对象,随机分为研究组(n=58)和对照组(n=58)。对照组采用常规干预治疗,研究组采用手术室干预治疗。比较两组患者压伤发生率、压伤恢复评分、SAS、SDS评分。结果:干预后,研究组压伤发生率低于对照组,术后活动能力和感知能力均优于对照组。此外,实验组患者在治疗过程中产生的焦虑、抑郁等负面情绪在干预下得到了更有效的缓解。本研究结果有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结论:干预措施能有效缓解患者在治疗过程中产生的负面情绪,减少术后压迫性损伤的发生率,减轻患者的疼痛和经济压力,缩短患者的恢复时间,提高患者发生压迫性损伤后的活动能力和感知能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Preventive Care and Rehabilitation Nursing on Elderly Hypertension Meta-analysis of In-stent Restenosis Factors after Coronary Intervention Effect of Dietary Carotenoids and Lutein on Eye Health Maintenance in Elderly People One Case of Solar Dermatitis Treated with Umbilical Needle "Four Positions" Combined with Body Acupuncture Primary Presacral Neuroendocrine Tumors Presented by Lumbosacral Pain: a Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1