{"title":"Technology to Freeze Time at Lassus and Viollet-le-Duc’s Notre-Dame of Paris: Learning from the Past for the Cathedral of the Future","authors":"Lindsay Cook","doi":"10.5749/futuante.17.1.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article considers the use of plaster casting, an artistic technology, and silicatization, a scientific technology, in Jean-Baptiste Lassus and Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc’s nineteenth-century restoration of Notre-Dame of Paris. Plaster casting, practiced widely in academic artistic circles in the century prior to the restoration campaign, facilitated the work of the sculptors who toiled in the lodge just south of the cathedral’s southern face. The technology was employed in the early years of the restoration campaign and merited mention in an entry recorded by Lassus in the architects’ daybook of 1847. Entries in the 1853–59 daybooks from Viollet-le-Duc’s pen attest to the sustained use of silicatization, a process that involved coating the building’s limestone surfaces in a protective layer of water-soluble sodium silicate. Its practitioners touted it as a miraculous technology that would “stop the ravages of time on monuments.” Plaster casting was a tried-and-true artistic technology, exploited at Notre-Dame to a novel end, whereas silicatization was a cutting-edge application of water glass, the German chemist Johann von Fuchs’s early-nineteenth-century invention. This article places Lassus and Viollet-le-Duc’s restoration practice of the 1840s and 1850s at the crossroads between art and science, between nationalist competition and international collaboration, and considers what we might learn from their approach for the twenty-first-century restoration following the 2019 cathedral fire.","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"44 1","pages":"47 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.17.1.0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:This article considers the use of plaster casting, an artistic technology, and silicatization, a scientific technology, in Jean-Baptiste Lassus and Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc’s nineteenth-century restoration of Notre-Dame of Paris. Plaster casting, practiced widely in academic artistic circles in the century prior to the restoration campaign, facilitated the work of the sculptors who toiled in the lodge just south of the cathedral’s southern face. The technology was employed in the early years of the restoration campaign and merited mention in an entry recorded by Lassus in the architects’ daybook of 1847. Entries in the 1853–59 daybooks from Viollet-le-Duc’s pen attest to the sustained use of silicatization, a process that involved coating the building’s limestone surfaces in a protective layer of water-soluble sodium silicate. Its practitioners touted it as a miraculous technology that would “stop the ravages of time on monuments.” Plaster casting was a tried-and-true artistic technology, exploited at Notre-Dame to a novel end, whereas silicatization was a cutting-edge application of water glass, the German chemist Johann von Fuchs’s early-nineteenth-century invention. This article places Lassus and Viollet-le-Duc’s restoration practice of the 1840s and 1850s at the crossroads between art and science, between nationalist competition and international collaboration, and considers what we might learn from their approach for the twenty-first-century restoration following the 2019 cathedral fire.
摘要:本文考察了19世纪让-巴蒂斯特·拉苏斯和欧格朗-伊曼纽尔·维奥莱-勒-杜克修复巴黎圣母院时,石膏浇铸这一艺术技术和硅化这一科学技术的运用。在修复运动之前的一个世纪里,石膏浇铸在学术艺术界广泛使用,这为雕塑家们的工作提供了便利,他们在大教堂南侧的小屋里辛苦劳作。这项技术在修复运动的早期被采用,在1847年拉苏斯在建筑师日记本上记录的条目中值得提及。Viollet-le-Duc在1853年至1859年的日记中记录了硅化的持续使用,这一过程涉及在建筑的石灰石表面涂上一层水溶性硅酸钠保护层。它的实践者将其吹捧为一种神奇的技术,可以“阻止时间对纪念碑的破坏”。石膏铸造是一种久经考验的艺术技术,在巴黎圣母院得到了新奇的利用,而硅化是水玻璃的尖端应用,是德国化学家约翰·冯·富克斯(Johann von Fuchs) 19世纪初的发明。本文将Lassus和Viollet-le-Duc在19世纪40年代和50年代的修复实践置于艺术与科学、民族主义竞争与国际合作的十字路口,并考虑我们可以从他们在2019年大教堂火灾后的21世纪修复方法中学到什么。