Technology to Freeze Time at Lassus and Viollet-le-Duc’s Notre-Dame of Paris: Learning from the Past for the Cathedral of the Future

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Future Anterior Pub Date : 2021-08-05 DOI:10.5749/futuante.17.1.0047
Lindsay Cook
{"title":"Technology to Freeze Time at Lassus and Viollet-le-Duc’s Notre-Dame of Paris: Learning from the Past for the Cathedral of the Future","authors":"Lindsay Cook","doi":"10.5749/futuante.17.1.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article considers the use of plaster casting, an artistic technology, and silicatization, a scientific technology, in Jean-Baptiste Lassus and Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc’s nineteenth-century restoration of Notre-Dame of Paris. Plaster casting, practiced widely in academic artistic circles in the century prior to the restoration campaign, facilitated the work of the sculptors who toiled in the lodge just south of the cathedral’s southern face. The technology was employed in the early years of the restoration campaign and merited mention in an entry recorded by Lassus in the architects’ daybook of 1847. Entries in the 1853–59 daybooks from Viollet-le-Duc’s pen attest to the sustained use of silicatization, a process that involved coating the building’s limestone surfaces in a protective layer of water-soluble sodium silicate. Its practitioners touted it as a miraculous technology that would “stop the ravages of time on monuments.” Plaster casting was a tried-and-true artistic technology, exploited at Notre-Dame to a novel end, whereas silicatization was a cutting-edge application of water glass, the German chemist Johann von Fuchs’s early-nineteenth-century invention. This article places Lassus and Viollet-le-Duc’s restoration practice of the 1840s and 1850s at the crossroads between art and science, between nationalist competition and international collaboration, and considers what we might learn from their approach for the twenty-first-century restoration following the 2019 cathedral fire.","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"44 1","pages":"47 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.17.1.0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article considers the use of plaster casting, an artistic technology, and silicatization, a scientific technology, in Jean-Baptiste Lassus and Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc’s nineteenth-century restoration of Notre-Dame of Paris. Plaster casting, practiced widely in academic artistic circles in the century prior to the restoration campaign, facilitated the work of the sculptors who toiled in the lodge just south of the cathedral’s southern face. The technology was employed in the early years of the restoration campaign and merited mention in an entry recorded by Lassus in the architects’ daybook of 1847. Entries in the 1853–59 daybooks from Viollet-le-Duc’s pen attest to the sustained use of silicatization, a process that involved coating the building’s limestone surfaces in a protective layer of water-soluble sodium silicate. Its practitioners touted it as a miraculous technology that would “stop the ravages of time on monuments.” Plaster casting was a tried-and-true artistic technology, exploited at Notre-Dame to a novel end, whereas silicatization was a cutting-edge application of water glass, the German chemist Johann von Fuchs’s early-nineteenth-century invention. This article places Lassus and Viollet-le-Duc’s restoration practice of the 1840s and 1850s at the crossroads between art and science, between nationalist competition and international collaboration, and considers what we might learn from their approach for the twenty-first-century restoration following the 2019 cathedral fire.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在拉苏斯和维奥莱特公爵的巴黎圣母院冻结时间的技术:从过去学习未来的大教堂
摘要:本文考察了19世纪让-巴蒂斯特·拉苏斯和欧格朗-伊曼纽尔·维奥莱-勒-杜克修复巴黎圣母院时,石膏浇铸这一艺术技术和硅化这一科学技术的运用。在修复运动之前的一个世纪里,石膏浇铸在学术艺术界广泛使用,这为雕塑家们的工作提供了便利,他们在大教堂南侧的小屋里辛苦劳作。这项技术在修复运动的早期被采用,在1847年拉苏斯在建筑师日记本上记录的条目中值得提及。Viollet-le-Duc在1853年至1859年的日记中记录了硅化的持续使用,这一过程涉及在建筑的石灰石表面涂上一层水溶性硅酸钠保护层。它的实践者将其吹捧为一种神奇的技术,可以“阻止时间对纪念碑的破坏”。石膏铸造是一种久经考验的艺术技术,在巴黎圣母院得到了新奇的利用,而硅化是水玻璃的尖端应用,是德国化学家约翰·冯·富克斯(Johann von Fuchs) 19世纪初的发明。本文将Lassus和Viollet-le-Duc在19世纪40年代和50年代的修复实践置于艺术与科学、民族主义竞争与国际合作的十字路口,并考虑我们可以从他们在2019年大教堂火灾后的21世纪修复方法中学到什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future Anterior
Future Anterior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Life and Death of Skanderbeg Square: A Chronicle of an Undoing Foretold, in a Hundred Years Slightly Disappointing Ruins and the Facades of Tourist Imagery Dirty Industry, Heritage, and the Erasure of Immigrant Pasts The Necessary Interlinking of Culture and Climate Change Heritage Conservation in Postcolonial India: Approaches and Challenges ed. by Manish Chalana and Ashima Krishna (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1