Coda: Creativity in psychological research versus in linguistics – Same but different?

Q1 Arts and Humanities Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.31234/osf.io/asbrx
S. Weiss, O. Wilhelm
{"title":"Coda: Creativity in psychological research versus in linguistics – Same but different?","authors":"S. Weiss, O. Wilhelm","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/asbrx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Understanding the very nature of creativity is a hot topic in research across various disciplines and has profound societal relevance. In this contribution, we discuss verbal creativity by highlighting its definition, psychometric measurement, and relations with other personality dispositions. We relate psychological research with findings from linguistics presented in this issue and depict similarities and differences between both approaches. More specifically, we relate the linguistic terminology of F-creativity to fluency and flexibility, whereas we identify E-creativity as akin to originality. We propose latent semantic analysis as a possible approach for evaluating originality and compare this approach with more commonly applied human ratings. Based on contributions in this issue, we discuss creativity as a domain-general process that is (e. g., in applied arts) often driven by the recombination of mental elements. Lastly, we propose several intelligence and personality dispositions as determinants of individual differences in creativity. We conclude that creativity research in linguistic and psychology has many communalities and interdisciplinary work bears strong promises for the future.","PeriodicalId":52385,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semiotics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/asbrx","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the very nature of creativity is a hot topic in research across various disciplines and has profound societal relevance. In this contribution, we discuss verbal creativity by highlighting its definition, psychometric measurement, and relations with other personality dispositions. We relate psychological research with findings from linguistics presented in this issue and depict similarities and differences between both approaches. More specifically, we relate the linguistic terminology of F-creativity to fluency and flexibility, whereas we identify E-creativity as akin to originality. We propose latent semantic analysis as a possible approach for evaluating originality and compare this approach with more commonly applied human ratings. Based on contributions in this issue, we discuss creativity as a domain-general process that is (e. g., in applied arts) often driven by the recombination of mental elements. Lastly, we propose several intelligence and personality dispositions as determinants of individual differences in creativity. We conclude that creativity research in linguistic and psychology has many communalities and interdisciplinary work bears strong promises for the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结语:心理学研究中的创造力与语言学中的创造力——相同但不同?
理解创造力的本质是各个学科研究的热门话题,具有深远的社会意义。在这篇文章中,我们通过强调语言创造力的定义、心理测量以及与其他人格倾向的关系来讨论语言创造力。我们将心理学研究与本期提出的语言学研究结果联系起来,并描述两种方法之间的异同。更具体地说,我们将f创造力的语言学术语与流畅性和灵活性联系起来,而我们将e创造力与独创性联系起来。我们提出潜在语义分析作为评估原创性的可能方法,并将这种方法与更常用的人类评分方法进行比较。基于本期的贡献,我们将创造力作为一个领域的通用过程来讨论(例如,在应用艺术中),它通常是由心理元素的重组驱动的。最后,我们提出了智力和人格倾向作为创造力个体差异的决定因素。我们得出的结论是,语言学和心理学的创造力研究有许多社区,跨学科的工作在未来有着强大的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Semiotics
Cognitive Semiotics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Art, pictoriality and semiotics – a reflection on Göran Sonesson’s contribution to art theory Psychologism in the study of children’s semiotic development Apple-and-pin drawings by blind novices show occluded features: region theory The cultural semiotics of Jingshen and cognitive homeostasis Dialogue and the “miracle of language”: the early and late Bakhtin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1