Decision Making Model for Business Process Outsourcing of Enterprise Content Management

IF 2.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Australasian Journal of Information Systems Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI:10.3127/AJIS.V18I1.799
Zhuojun Yi, Dongming Xu
{"title":"Decision Making Model for Business Process Outsourcing of Enterprise Content Management","authors":"Zhuojun Yi, Dongming Xu","doi":"10.3127/AJIS.V18I1.799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business process outsourcing (BPO) in enterprise content management (ECM) is a growing though immature market. BPO in ECM focuses on pursuing market transactions in the process of managing all types of content being used in organizations. However, inadequate sourcing decisions lead to organizational sensitive content exposure, high transaction cost, poor outsourcer performance, low flexibility. ECM BPO in general is rarely discussed in the literature and no discussion was found on decision making strategies in ECM BPO. In this paper, we present a decision making model for ECM BPO that will fill the literature gap and guide industry practitioners with ECM sourcing decision making strategies. Our proposed decision making model includes two parts. Part one is an ECM functional framework that shows what functionality component or functionality combinations can be outsourced. Part two is a decision making model that provides guidance for decision making in ECM BPO. We apply the model in two case studies, and the results indicate that the model can guide the sourcing decision making process for organizations, and determine the factors when considering sourcing alternatives in ECM.","PeriodicalId":45261,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3127/AJIS.V18I1.799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Business process outsourcing (BPO) in enterprise content management (ECM) is a growing though immature market. BPO in ECM focuses on pursuing market transactions in the process of managing all types of content being used in organizations. However, inadequate sourcing decisions lead to organizational sensitive content exposure, high transaction cost, poor outsourcer performance, low flexibility. ECM BPO in general is rarely discussed in the literature and no discussion was found on decision making strategies in ECM BPO. In this paper, we present a decision making model for ECM BPO that will fill the literature gap and guide industry practitioners with ECM sourcing decision making strategies. Our proposed decision making model includes two parts. Part one is an ECM functional framework that shows what functionality component or functionality combinations can be outsourced. Part two is a decision making model that provides guidance for decision making in ECM BPO. We apply the model in two case studies, and the results indicate that the model can guide the sourcing decision making process for organizations, and determine the factors when considering sourcing alternatives in ECM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业内容管理业务流程外包决策模型
企业内容管理(ECM)中的业务流程外包(BPO)是一个正在成长但尚未成熟的市场。ECM中的BPO侧重于在管理组织中使用的所有类型的内容的过程中追求市场交易。然而,不充分的外包决策导致组织敏感内容暴露,交易成本高,外包绩效差,灵活性低。一般而言,文献中很少讨论ECM业务流程流程,也没有发现关于ECM业务流程流程流程中的决策策略的讨论。在本文中,我们提出了ECM业务流程外包的决策模型,该模型将填补文献空白,并指导行业从业者制定ECM采购决策策略。我们提出的决策模型包括两个部分。第一部分是ECM功能框架,展示了哪些功能组件或功能组合可以外包。第二部分是一个决策模型,为ECM业务流程外包中的决策提供指导。结果表明,该模型可以指导企业采购决策过程,并确定企业在ECM中考虑采购替代方案时的影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Information Systems
Australasian Journal of Information Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
(Why) Do We Trust AI?: A Case of AI-based Health Chatbots Sociotechnical perspectives of digital technologies in sustainable mining “Use” as a Conscious Thought: Towards a Theory of “Use” in Autonomous Things Machine Learning Based Decision-Making: A Sensemaking Perspective The Role of Actors in Blockchain Adoption Decisions – An Innovation Translation Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1