Biotechnology and Biodefense Enterprise: An Industry Perspective on Defence Acquisition

Kenneth B Yeh, Eric Du, G. Olinger, Donna S. Boston
{"title":"Biotechnology and Biodefense Enterprise: An Industry Perspective on Defence Acquisition","authors":"Kenneth B Yeh, Eric Du, G. Olinger, Donna S. Boston","doi":"10.1080/23779497.2022.2102527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Biotechnology is gaining priority along with other rapidly evolving disciplines in science and engineering due to its potential for innovating the modern military. The broad nature of biotechnology is directly relevant to the military and defence sector where the applications span clinical diagnostics, medical countermeasures and therapeutics, to environmental remediation and biofuels for energy. Although the process for a commercial biotech research and development (R&D) pipeline and the Department of Defence (DOD) acquisition cycle both aim to result in products, they follow two distinctly different pathways. In the biotech industry, the pipeline progresses from basic to applied science that includes design and R&D, commercialisation and product launch, where market forces and financial returns on investment drive priorities. Along the way, the scientific and iterative nature of R&D often results in several candidates for a given assay, drug, therapeutic or vaccine, many of which are unsuccessful or wind up in the so-called valley of death. The DOD acquisition process is a multi-phase and often multi-decade cradle-to-grave product lifecycle engrained in mission requirements, warfighter needs and creating legacy programmes of record. The biotech industry is composed of many small R&D and ‘big pharma’ companies that meet DOD’s unique medical mission requirements. These small R&D companies considered that non-traditional DOD acquisition partners are developing new innovations in biotechnology, but the complex DOD acquisition process is challenging for these small start-ups to navigate. Technology solutions that gain support through DOD acquisitions are able to successfully develop their products and bridge the valley of death by obtaining much needed funding for advanced development, test and evaluation, and demonstration through clinical trials. Our analysis profiles three case histories involving private-public partnerships that yielded biotech products developed through the DOD acquisition cycle that continues to meet current and future medical mission requirements.","PeriodicalId":32212,"journal":{"name":"Global Security Health Science and Policy","volume":"30 1","pages":"37 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Security Health Science and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2022.2102527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Biotechnology is gaining priority along with other rapidly evolving disciplines in science and engineering due to its potential for innovating the modern military. The broad nature of biotechnology is directly relevant to the military and defence sector where the applications span clinical diagnostics, medical countermeasures and therapeutics, to environmental remediation and biofuels for energy. Although the process for a commercial biotech research and development (R&D) pipeline and the Department of Defence (DOD) acquisition cycle both aim to result in products, they follow two distinctly different pathways. In the biotech industry, the pipeline progresses from basic to applied science that includes design and R&D, commercialisation and product launch, where market forces and financial returns on investment drive priorities. Along the way, the scientific and iterative nature of R&D often results in several candidates for a given assay, drug, therapeutic or vaccine, many of which are unsuccessful or wind up in the so-called valley of death. The DOD acquisition process is a multi-phase and often multi-decade cradle-to-grave product lifecycle engrained in mission requirements, warfighter needs and creating legacy programmes of record. The biotech industry is composed of many small R&D and ‘big pharma’ companies that meet DOD’s unique medical mission requirements. These small R&D companies considered that non-traditional DOD acquisition partners are developing new innovations in biotechnology, but the complex DOD acquisition process is challenging for these small start-ups to navigate. Technology solutions that gain support through DOD acquisitions are able to successfully develop their products and bridge the valley of death by obtaining much needed funding for advanced development, test and evaluation, and demonstration through clinical trials. Our analysis profiles three case histories involving private-public partnerships that yielded biotech products developed through the DOD acquisition cycle that continues to meet current and future medical mission requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物技术和生物防御企业:国防采办的工业视角
由于生物技术具有创新现代军事的潜力,它与其他快速发展的科学和工程学科一起获得了优先考虑。生物技术的广泛性质与军事和国防部门直接相关,其应用范围涵盖临床诊断、医疗对策和治疗、环境修复和能源生物燃料。尽管商业生物技术研发(R&D)流程和国防部(DOD)采购周期都旨在产生产品,但它们遵循两种截然不同的途径。在生物技术行业,从基础科学发展到应用科学,包括设计和研发、商业化和产品发布,其中市场力量和投资的财务回报决定了优先事项。在这一过程中,研发的科学性和迭代性往往会导致一种特定的检测方法、药物、治疗方法或疫苗有几个候选方案,其中许多都不成功,或者最终进入所谓的死亡之谷。国防部采购过程是一个多阶段的过程,通常是几十年的产品生命周期,根植于任务需求、作战人员需求和创建传统记录项目中。生物技术产业由许多小型研发和“大型制药”公司组成,这些公司满足国防部独特的医疗任务要求。这些小型研发公司认为,非传统的国防部采办合作伙伴正在开发生物技术方面的新创新,但复杂的国防部采办过程对这些小型初创企业来说是一个挑战。通过国防部收购获得支持的技术解决方案能够成功开发其产品,并通过获得急需的资金来进行先进的开发、测试和评估,并通过临床试验进行演示,从而跨越死亡之谷。我们的分析概述了三个案例历史,这些案例涉及公私合作伙伴关系,通过国防部采购周期开发生物技术产品,继续满足当前和未来的医疗任务需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using a Target Product Profile (TPP) to guide innovation for future In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) developments in the United States Conflict and social determinants of health: would global health diplomacy resolve the Afghanistan healthcare conundrum? Working beyond health: roles of global health security agenda, experiences of Thailand’s chairmanship amidst of the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic Public Health Emergency of International Concern declared by the World Health Organization for Monkeypox Biotechnology and Biodefense Enterprise: An Industry Perspective on Defence Acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1