Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous and Ethanol Fruit Extracts of Cucumis ‎sativus Linn. Against Selected Microorganisms at the University of ‎Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri

A. Akanmu, H. Yunus, S. Balogun, O. Sodipo, L. M. Paul, I. Gulani
{"title":"Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous and Ethanol Fruit Extracts of Cucumis ‎sativus Linn. Against Selected Microorganisms at the University of ‎Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri","authors":"A. Akanmu, H. Yunus, S. Balogun, O. Sodipo, L. M. Paul, I. Gulani","doi":"10.54058/saheljvs.v18i2.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cucumber (Cucumis sativus Linn) [Cucurbitaceae] is a famous vegetable crop used for food since ancient times but little is known of its antibacterial potential. This study investigated the phytochemical constituents and antibacterial activities of the aqueous and ethanol fruit extracts of the plant against some clinical isolates (Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Bacillus subtilis and Corynebacterium spp) using the disc diffusion method. The qualitative phytochemical screening revealed the presence of carbohydrates, cardiac glycosides, terpenoids, cardenolites and flavonoids. Corynebacterium spp was the most susceptible (with maximum inhibition zone of 30.00±0.00 mm). The two extracts had varied antibacterial activity at the same level. At the concentration of 400mg/ml, aqueous extract inhibited S. aureus, Corynebacterium spp, E. coli and K. pneumoniae, while ethanol extract inhibited S. aureus, S. pyogenes, S. typhi and Corynebacterium spp. B. subtilis was inhibited only at the highest (significant) concentration of 600mg/ml (7.00±0.00 mm)[p<0.05]. The MIC value for both extracts against Corynebacterium spp was 25mg/ml. The MBC value against Corynebacterium spp was observed at 50mg/ml and 25mg/ml for the aqueous and ethanol extract respectively. The results suggest that the ethanol extract was bactericidal at low concentration while the aqueous extract was bacteriostatic at low concentration and bactericidal at high concentration against Corynebacterium spp. The difference between the MBC for the two extracts was significant (p<0.05). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that extract of C. sativus could be a potential source of natural antibacterial agent","PeriodicalId":21527,"journal":{"name":"Sahel Journal of Veterinary Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sahel Journal of Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54058/saheljvs.v18i2.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus Linn) [Cucurbitaceae] is a famous vegetable crop used for food since ancient times but little is known of its antibacterial potential. This study investigated the phytochemical constituents and antibacterial activities of the aqueous and ethanol fruit extracts of the plant against some clinical isolates (Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Bacillus subtilis and Corynebacterium spp) using the disc diffusion method. The qualitative phytochemical screening revealed the presence of carbohydrates, cardiac glycosides, terpenoids, cardenolites and flavonoids. Corynebacterium spp was the most susceptible (with maximum inhibition zone of 30.00±0.00 mm). The two extracts had varied antibacterial activity at the same level. At the concentration of 400mg/ml, aqueous extract inhibited S. aureus, Corynebacterium spp, E. coli and K. pneumoniae, while ethanol extract inhibited S. aureus, S. pyogenes, S. typhi and Corynebacterium spp. B. subtilis was inhibited only at the highest (significant) concentration of 600mg/ml (7.00±0.00 mm)[p<0.05]. The MIC value for both extracts against Corynebacterium spp was 25mg/ml. The MBC value against Corynebacterium spp was observed at 50mg/ml and 25mg/ml for the aqueous and ethanol extract respectively. The results suggest that the ethanol extract was bactericidal at low concentration while the aqueous extract was bacteriostatic at low concentration and bactericidal at high concentration against Corynebacterium spp. The difference between the MBC for the two extracts was significant (p<0.05). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that extract of C. sativus could be a potential source of natural antibacterial agent
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黄瓜果实水提物和乙醇提物抑菌活性研究迈杜古里大学教学医院的选定微生物
黄瓜(Cucumis sativus Linn)[葫芦科]是一种著名的蔬菜作物,自古以来就被用作食物,但人们对其抗菌潜力知之甚少。本研究采用圆盘扩散法研究了水提液和乙醇提液对大肠杆菌、伤寒沙门氏菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、化脓性链球菌、枯草芽孢杆菌和棒状杆菌等临床分离株的植物化学成分及抑菌活性。定性植物化学筛选结果显示,其含有碳水化合物、心糖苷、萜类、橄榄石和黄酮类化合物。棒状杆菌最敏感,最大抑菌区为30.00±0.00 mm。两种提取物在相同水平上具有不同的抑菌活性。在浓度为400mg/ml时,水提物对金黄色葡萄球菌、棒状杆菌、大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌均有抑制作用,而乙醇提物对金黄色葡萄球菌、化脓性葡萄球菌、伤寒葡萄球菌和棒状杆菌均有抑制作用,枯草芽孢杆菌仅在浓度为600mg/ml(7.00±0.00 mm)时具有最高(显著)抑制作用[p<0.05]。两种提取物对棒状杆菌的MIC值均为25mg/ml。分别在50mg/ml和25mg/ml的水提物和乙醇提物中观察对棒状杆菌的MBC值。结果表明,乙醇提取物在低浓度下对棒状芽孢杆菌具有抑菌作用,而水提取物在低浓度下对棒状芽孢杆菌具有抑菌作用,在高浓度下对棒状芽孢杆菌具有杀菌作用,两种提取物的MBC差异显著(p<0.05)。综上所述,本研究结果表明,红花提取物可能是一种潜在的天然抗菌药物来源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodid Ticks Infesting White Fulani Cattle in Zaria and its Environs, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Effect of Serum Hyaluronic Acid on Wound Healing in Wister Rats Knowledge and Perceptions on recognizing Colic among Horse Handlers’ in Nigeria Assessment of Perception of Rabies Infection Risk among Dog Handlers and ‎Dog Meat Consumers in Plateau State, Nigeria Trypanocidal effects of Balanites aegyptiaca Del. (Zygophyllaceae) Leaf ‎Extract and Suramin on Trypanosoma evansi Experimental Infection in ‎Albino rat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1