Knowledge and Perceptions on recognizing Colic among Horse Handlers’ in Nigeria

B. Alaba, J. Abiola, E. Olajide, D. Omoniwa
{"title":"Knowledge and Perceptions on recognizing Colic among Horse Handlers’ in Nigeria","authors":"B. Alaba, J. Abiola, E. Olajide, D. Omoniwa","doi":"10.54058/saheljvs.v20i2.370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colic is one of the most common medical problems that horse handlers or owners encounter, and also one of the most prevalent emergency conditions of veterinarians concern. The capacity of a handler or owner to recognize colic and seek help is a crucial step in determining the outcome of a case. The purpose of this study was to evaluate horse handlers' knowledge and opinions on recognizing colic. Structured open and close ended questionnaires were used to obtain information from 77 participants. Information on demographic, understanding and recognition of the normal horse, understanding and recognition of colic in the horse, personal experiences with colic and sources of information on colic were obtained. Free text box was also provided. Descriptive statistics and Chi square were the analytic methods used. Most horse handlers did not know or gave erroneous values for their horse's normal clinical parameters. Only 5% (n= 4/77), 12% (n=9/77) and 3% (n=2/77) of participants gave answers that fell within the reference range values for heart rate, rectal temperature and respiratory rate respectively. There was a significant association between knowledge of normal heart rate (P<0.05), respiratory rate (P<0.05) and rectal temperature (P<0.05), and participants level of education. Most horse handlers indicated they would check fecal output (90%; n = 70/77) and appetite (88%; n = 68/77) if they felt their horse had colic. Also, majority of the respondents said unless colic signs were severe and continuous, they would not call a veterinarian and prefer to ask other handlers or use their personal experience to get information on colic. In conclusion, horse handlers have a poor understanding of colic, with misunderstandings and gaps in their knowledge. Hence, the need for trainings and educational programmes are recommended for horse handlers to assist them in making decisions.","PeriodicalId":21527,"journal":{"name":"Sahel Journal of Veterinary Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sahel Journal of Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54058/saheljvs.v20i2.370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colic is one of the most common medical problems that horse handlers or owners encounter, and also one of the most prevalent emergency conditions of veterinarians concern. The capacity of a handler or owner to recognize colic and seek help is a crucial step in determining the outcome of a case. The purpose of this study was to evaluate horse handlers' knowledge and opinions on recognizing colic. Structured open and close ended questionnaires were used to obtain information from 77 participants. Information on demographic, understanding and recognition of the normal horse, understanding and recognition of colic in the horse, personal experiences with colic and sources of information on colic were obtained. Free text box was also provided. Descriptive statistics and Chi square were the analytic methods used. Most horse handlers did not know or gave erroneous values for their horse's normal clinical parameters. Only 5% (n= 4/77), 12% (n=9/77) and 3% (n=2/77) of participants gave answers that fell within the reference range values for heart rate, rectal temperature and respiratory rate respectively. There was a significant association between knowledge of normal heart rate (P<0.05), respiratory rate (P<0.05) and rectal temperature (P<0.05), and participants level of education. Most horse handlers indicated they would check fecal output (90%; n = 70/77) and appetite (88%; n = 68/77) if they felt their horse had colic. Also, majority of the respondents said unless colic signs were severe and continuous, they would not call a veterinarian and prefer to ask other handlers or use their personal experience to get information on colic. In conclusion, horse handlers have a poor understanding of colic, with misunderstandings and gaps in their knowledge. Hence, the need for trainings and educational programmes are recommended for horse handlers to assist them in making decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚驯马员对疝气的认识和认知
绞痛是马的处理者或主人遇到的最常见的医疗问题之一,也是兽医关注的最普遍的紧急情况之一。处理者或主人识别疝气并寻求帮助的能力是决定案件结果的关键一步。本研究的目的是评估马操手对肠绞痛的认知和看法。采用结构化的开放式和封闭式问卷从77名参与者中获取信息。获得了马的人口统计学信息、对正常马的了解和认识、对马绞痛的了解和认识、个人绞痛经历和绞痛信息来源。还提供了免费文本框。分析方法采用描述性统计和卡方分布。大多数驯马员不知道或给出了错误的马的正常临床参数值。只有5% (n= 4/77)、12% (n=9/77)和3% (n=2/77)的参与者给出的答案分别在心率、直肠温度和呼吸频率的参考范围内。正常心率(P<0.05)、呼吸频率(P<0.05)、直肠温度(P<0.05)知识与受教育程度有显著相关。大多数驯马员表示他们会检查粪便排出量(90%;N = 70/77)和食欲(88%;N = 68/77),如果他们觉得他们的马有疝气。此外,大多数受访者表示,除非绞痛迹象严重且持续,否则他们不会打电话给兽医,而是倾向于询问其他处理人员或利用他们的个人经验来获取有关绞痛的信息。总之,驯马员对疝气的理解很差,他们的知识存在误解和空白。因此,建议有必要对训马员进行培训和教育计划,以帮助他们做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodid Ticks Infesting White Fulani Cattle in Zaria and its Environs, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Effect of Serum Hyaluronic Acid on Wound Healing in Wister Rats Knowledge and Perceptions on recognizing Colic among Horse Handlers’ in Nigeria Assessment of Perception of Rabies Infection Risk among Dog Handlers and ‎Dog Meat Consumers in Plateau State, Nigeria Trypanocidal effects of Balanites aegyptiaca Del. (Zygophyllaceae) Leaf ‎Extract and Suramin on Trypanosoma evansi Experimental Infection in ‎Albino rat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1