ZONING CONFLICTS OF HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL NATURE IN THE CITY OF IVANO-FRANKIVSK IN THE PROCESS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Abstract

Existing spatial conflicts related to the historical environment of the city of Ivano-Frankivsk are analyzed. Examples of the emergence of conflict-forming factors of spatial conflicts related to the impact on the historical and architectural environment of our city are given. An analysis of the appearance of this kind of spatial conflicts, which have the greatest impact on the historical center of the city, where the historical environment of our city is most concentrated, was conducted. Conducting an analysis of the given examples of spatial conflicts that arose on the territory of our city, related to the historical environment, gives grounds for drawing conclusions about the low professional ethics of architects, designers, managers who make decisions without thinking about the preservation of architectural monuments, are not far-sighted in terms of preserving the historical past. Manifestations of inconsistency between architectural and urban planning and historical and architectural legislation. After all, with further actions, we can lose the historical memory associated with many buildings or places, and in the future such places can be displayed only on commemorative plaques, and in the best case, or completely forgotten. It is necessary to continue the work on conducting a total inventory of the architectural monuments of our city with subsequent subsequent certification of historical monuments. Conduct work with all owners or tenants on the conclusion of security agreements with memo holders. Unsystematic intervention in the historical environment deprives us of many historical evidences; any construction work can be carried out in the historical area only after the conclusion of archaeologists. Therefore, during the constant monitoring of construction sites in the center of the city, the department for the protection of cultural heritage obliges developers to conclude agreements with archaeological services, or to assist archaeologists in surveying during earthworks, although in most cases they cause active opposition from both developers and builders.