Tipping the Scale in LNG Plant Design: Considerations for Train Size, Driver Selection, and Adopting Digitalization

D. Guccione, M. Russell
{"title":"Tipping the Scale in LNG Plant Design: Considerations for Train Size, Driver Selection, and Adopting Digitalization","authors":"D. Guccione, M. Russell","doi":"10.2118/193321-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In recent years, there has been a great deal of discussion surrounding the topic of mid-scale vs. large-scale liquefaction trains in LNG export facilities. While in some select cases, mid-scale trains (0.5 – 2 million tonnes per year (typ)) may offer commercial, executional, and financial advantages, the decision is not a simple matter of one-size-fits-all, as large trains (>3 million tpy) offer economies of scale, among other benefits. As this paper will explain, choosing a solution that delivers the most value over the life of a facility is contingent on the operator's specific objectives and circumstances. Ultimately, train size and liquefaction licensor selection have only a marginal impact on project capital costs as long as the total facility achieves a minimum of 8 million tpy (Russell, 2018).\n The paper will offer objective cases for building both mid- and large-scale trains and outline key areas for project stakeholders to consider when making an informed decision regarding capacity and liquefaction licensor. It will also discuss important considerations for optimizing LNG plant design, such as mechanical driver selection, modularization, and the incorporation of digital technologies. The paper will conclude by discussing the importance of adopting a holistic strategy that integrates the entire gas value chain when attempting to drive out costs, minimize risk, and maximize overall project economics.","PeriodicalId":11014,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193321-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a great deal of discussion surrounding the topic of mid-scale vs. large-scale liquefaction trains in LNG export facilities. While in some select cases, mid-scale trains (0.5 – 2 million tonnes per year (typ)) may offer commercial, executional, and financial advantages, the decision is not a simple matter of one-size-fits-all, as large trains (>3 million tpy) offer economies of scale, among other benefits. As this paper will explain, choosing a solution that delivers the most value over the life of a facility is contingent on the operator's specific objectives and circumstances. Ultimately, train size and liquefaction licensor selection have only a marginal impact on project capital costs as long as the total facility achieves a minimum of 8 million tpy (Russell, 2018). The paper will offer objective cases for building both mid- and large-scale trains and outline key areas for project stakeholders to consider when making an informed decision regarding capacity and liquefaction licensor. It will also discuss important considerations for optimizing LNG plant design, such as mechanical driver selection, modularization, and the incorporation of digital technologies. The paper will conclude by discussing the importance of adopting a holistic strategy that integrates the entire gas value chain when attempting to drive out costs, minimize risk, and maximize overall project economics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液化天然气工厂设计中的天平倾斜:列车规模、驾驶员选择和采用数字化的考虑
近年来,围绕LNG出口设施中中型与大型液化列车的话题进行了大量讨论。虽然在某些特定情况下,中型列车(每年50 - 200万吨)可能提供商业、执行和财务优势,但决定不是一个简单的一刀切的问题,因为大型列车(> 300万吨/年)提供规模经济,以及其他好处。正如本文所解释的,在设施的生命周期中,选择一种能够提供最大价值的解决方案取决于作业者的具体目标和情况。最终,只要总设施达到至少800万吨/年,列车规模和液化许可方的选择对项目资本成本只有边际影响(Russell, 2018)。本文将提供建造中型和大型列车的客观案例,并概述项目利益相关者在做出有关能力和液化许可方的明智决策时需要考虑的关键领域。本文还将讨论优化LNG工厂设计的重要考虑因素,如机械驱动器的选择、模块化和数字技术的结合。最后,本文将讨论在试图降低成本、降低风险和最大化整体项目经济效益时,采用整合整个天然气价值链的整体战略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the kappa number method accurately reflect lignin content in nonwood pulps? Using multistage models to evaluate how pulp washing after the first extraction stage impacts elemental chlorine-free bleach demand Understanding the risks and rewards of using 50% vs. 10% strength peroxide in pulp bleach plants Understanding the pulping and bleaching performances of eucalyptus woods affected by physiological disturbance Measurements of the Inorganic Scale Buildup Rate on Downhole Completion Equipment – Debris Barrier Screens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1