A Political Economy of Utopia

Y. Benkler
{"title":"A Political Economy of Utopia","authors":"Y. Benkler","doi":"10.4324/9780203469682.ch7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Perry Barlow’s two essays capture a yearning to escape the oppressive clutches of the two most important institutional forms in modernity: the state and market society. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace is explicitly against the modern state. One might say, “All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”1 The Declaration reflected not only a libertarian utopia that assumed that if only the state were to back off markets will take care of it all, but also a left-anchored critique of the state as a critical site of protecting the power and privilege of elites, insistence that individual self-actualization demanded a state contained within narrow boundaries, and a deep skepticism of all forms of authority, as Fred Turner showed in From Counterculture to Cyberculture.2 Selling Wine Without Bottles is not against markets or payment as such, but rather a resistance to the totalizing vision of commodity exchange as all there is. In this, for me a telling passage was:","PeriodicalId":87176,"journal":{"name":"Duke law and technology review","volume":"1 1","pages":"78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke law and technology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469682.ch7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

John Perry Barlow’s two essays capture a yearning to escape the oppressive clutches of the two most important institutional forms in modernity: the state and market society. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace is explicitly against the modern state. One might say, “All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”1 The Declaration reflected not only a libertarian utopia that assumed that if only the state were to back off markets will take care of it all, but also a left-anchored critique of the state as a critical site of protecting the power and privilege of elites, insistence that individual self-actualization demanded a state contained within narrow boundaries, and a deep skepticism of all forms of authority, as Fred Turner showed in From Counterculture to Cyberculture.2 Selling Wine Without Bottles is not against markets or payment as such, but rather a resistance to the totalizing vision of commodity exchange as all there is. In this, for me a telling passage was:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌托邦的政治经济学
约翰·佩里·巴洛(John Perry Barlow)的两篇文章捕捉到了一种渴望,即摆脱现代性中两种最重要的制度形式——国家和市场社会——的压迫。《网络空间独立宣言》明确反对现代国家。有人可能会说:“好吧,但除了卫生、医药、教育、葡萄酒、公共秩序、灌溉、道路、淡水系统和公共卫生之外,罗马人为我们做过什么?”“1《宣言》不仅反映了一种自由主义乌托邦,认为只要国家退出市场就能解决一切问题,而且还反映了一种左派对国家的批判,认为国家是保护精英权力和特权的关键场所,坚持个人自我实现需要一个被限制在狭窄边界内的国家,以及对所有形式的权威的深刻怀疑。正如弗雷德·特纳在《从反主流文化到网络文化》一书中所表明的那样。2无瓶卖酒并不反对市场或支付,而是反对商品交换的整体愿景。对我来说,其中有一段话很能说明问题:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Political Economy of Utopia Hacking the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Dangers, and Legal Responses Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'Right to an Explanation' Is Probably Not the Remedy You Are Looking For Legal Nature of Emails: A Comparative Perspective Reasonable Expectations of Privacy Settings: Social Media and the Stored Communications Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1