Resilience in the context of multiple adverse circumstances? Leadership capacity and teachers’ practice during COVID-19 at schools serving disadvantaged communities

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Leadership & Management Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1080/13632434.2022.2137727
Laura Beckmann, E. D. Klein
{"title":"Resilience in the context of multiple adverse circumstances? Leadership capacity and teachers’ practice during COVID-19 at schools serving disadvantaged communities","authors":"Laura Beckmann, E. D. Klein","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2022.2137727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Building and sustaining capacity for organisational learning appears to be a prerequisite for organisational resilience. For schools, organisational learning in crisis situations, such as COVID-19, requires that they have certain learning capacities. Using quasi-longitudinal data, the paper analyses how schools’ leadership capacity (as perceived by educators) at schools serving disadvantaged communities (SSDC) at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic predicted the educators’ practice about a half year after returning to face-to-face-teaching (objectives and expectations regarding student performance and the staff’s willingness to innovate). We used data from two standardised surveys of the staff from 35 SSDC in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, conducted at the beginning of 2020, and at the end of 2021. The results of multilevel regression analyses showed that a higher leadership capacity at the start of the pandemic predicted a stronger orientation towards performance objectives during distance learning. No associations were found, however, between schools’ leadership capacity and the educators’ expectations regarding student performance as well as between schools’ leadership capacity and the staff’s willingness to innovate. Our findings help strengthen our knowledge about the antecedents of successful school improvement in challenging locations during times of crisis.","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"328 1","pages":"145 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2137727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Building and sustaining capacity for organisational learning appears to be a prerequisite for organisational resilience. For schools, organisational learning in crisis situations, such as COVID-19, requires that they have certain learning capacities. Using quasi-longitudinal data, the paper analyses how schools’ leadership capacity (as perceived by educators) at schools serving disadvantaged communities (SSDC) at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic predicted the educators’ practice about a half year after returning to face-to-face-teaching (objectives and expectations regarding student performance and the staff’s willingness to innovate). We used data from two standardised surveys of the staff from 35 SSDC in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, conducted at the beginning of 2020, and at the end of 2021. The results of multilevel regression analyses showed that a higher leadership capacity at the start of the pandemic predicted a stronger orientation towards performance objectives during distance learning. No associations were found, however, between schools’ leadership capacity and the educators’ expectations regarding student performance as well as between schools’ leadership capacity and the staff’s willingness to innovate. Our findings help strengthen our knowledge about the antecedents of successful school improvement in challenging locations during times of crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重不利环境下的适应力?为弱势社区服务的学校在COVID-19期间的领导能力和教师实践
建立和维持组织学习的能力似乎是组织弹性的先决条件。对于学校来说,在COVID-19等危机情况下的组织学习要求他们具有一定的学习能力。使用准纵向数据,本文分析了在COVID-19大流行开始时,学校在为弱势社区服务的学校(SSDC)中的领导能力(由教育工作者感知)如何预测教育工作者在回归面对面教学后大约半年的实践(关于学生表现的目标和期望以及员工的创新意愿)。我们使用了对德国北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚州35个SSDC的工作人员进行的两次标准化调查的数据,调查于2020年初和2021年底进行。多层回归分析的结果表明,在大流行开始时,较高的领导能力预示着远程学习期间更倾向于实现绩效目标。然而,学校的领导能力与教育者对学生表现的期望之间以及学校的领导能力与员工的创新意愿之间没有关联。我们的研究结果有助于加强我们对危机时期在具有挑战性的地区成功改善学校的先决条件的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Leadership & Management
School Leadership & Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.60%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.
期刊最新文献
Note Exploring principals’ process of gathering, reflecting upon and implementing feedback from their teachers: a grounded theory From crisis leadership to digital and inclusive leadership in the aftermath of the pandemic ‘Intersectional collaboration’: a new form of leadership from the WomenEd movement Navigating uncharted waters: leadership insights from successfully reopened schools amid the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1