IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH LEARNING STYLES

Iwansyah Putra, Faoyan Agus Furyanto, N. Islamiah
{"title":"IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH LEARNING STYLES","authors":"Iwansyah Putra, Faoyan Agus Furyanto, N. Islamiah","doi":"10.46491/jp.v7i4.1188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing is an extremely complex cognitive activity in which the writer is required to demonstrate control of variables simultaneously. This research aimed to investigate whether there was a significant difference of students’ writing achievement before and after being taught through students’ learning style. Since the students of Islamic Senior High School in Sekayu still found it very difficult to do. The sample of the research was eleventh grade student. The research was conducted by applying quasi-experimental factorial research. Non-randomized sampling technique was applied in this research. Modality Test Questioners from Neil Fleming  was applied to determine students’ learning styles. The sample was 62 students of science students. In terms of pretest – posttest non- equivalent group design. The Mean of posttest’s score was higher than pre-test. It means that there is an increase of students’ writing’s achievement after being taught through their styles in learning. \nWriting is an extremely complex cognitive activity in which the writer is required to demonstrate control of variables simultaneously. This research aimed to investigate whether there was a significant difference of students’ writing achievement before and after being taught through students’ learning style. Since the students of Islamic Senior High School in Sekayu still found it very difficult to do. The sample of the research was eleventh grade student. The research was conducted by applying quasi-experimental factorial research. Non-randomized sampling technique was applied in this research. Modality Test Questioners from Neil Fleming  was applied to determine students’ learning styles. The sample was 62 students of science students. In terms of pretest – posttest non- equivalent group design. The Mean of posttest’s score was higher than pre-test. It means that there is an increase of students’ writing’s achievement after being taught through their styles in learning.","PeriodicalId":31665,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian","volume":"130-132 1-3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46491/jp.v7i4.1188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing is an extremely complex cognitive activity in which the writer is required to demonstrate control of variables simultaneously. This research aimed to investigate whether there was a significant difference of students’ writing achievement before and after being taught through students’ learning style. Since the students of Islamic Senior High School in Sekayu still found it very difficult to do. The sample of the research was eleventh grade student. The research was conducted by applying quasi-experimental factorial research. Non-randomized sampling technique was applied in this research. Modality Test Questioners from Neil Fleming  was applied to determine students’ learning styles. The sample was 62 students of science students. In terms of pretest – posttest non- equivalent group design. The Mean of posttest’s score was higher than pre-test. It means that there is an increase of students’ writing’s achievement after being taught through their styles in learning. Writing is an extremely complex cognitive activity in which the writer is required to demonstrate control of variables simultaneously. This research aimed to investigate whether there was a significant difference of students’ writing achievement before and after being taught through students’ learning style. Since the students of Islamic Senior High School in Sekayu still found it very difficult to do. The sample of the research was eleventh grade student. The research was conducted by applying quasi-experimental factorial research. Non-randomized sampling technique was applied in this research. Modality Test Questioners from Neil Fleming  was applied to determine students’ learning styles. The sample was 62 students of science students. In terms of pretest – posttest non- equivalent group design. The Mean of posttest’s score was higher than pre-test. It means that there is an increase of students’ writing’s achievement after being taught through their styles in learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过学习风格提高学生的写作成绩
写作是一项极其复杂的认知活动,作者需要同时展示对变量的控制。本研究旨在探讨通过学生的学习风格进行教学前后,学生的写作成绩是否存在显著差异。因为Sekayu伊斯兰高中的学生仍然觉得很难做到。本研究的样本为高一学生。本研究采用准实验析因研究方法。本研究采用非随机抽样技术。来自尼尔·弗莱明的情态测试提问者被用来确定学生的学习风格。样本是62名理科生。在前测-后测非等效组设计方面。后测得分均值高于前测。这意味着在学习过程中,通过学生的风格进行教学,学生的写作成绩有所提高。写作是一项极其复杂的认知活动,作者需要同时展示对变量的控制。本研究旨在探讨通过学生的学习风格进行教学前后,学生的写作成绩是否存在显著差异。因为Sekayu伊斯兰高中的学生仍然觉得很难做到。本研究的样本为高一学生。本研究采用准实验析因研究方法。本研究采用非随机抽样技术。来自尼尔·弗莱明的情态测试提问者被用来确定学生的学习风格。样本是62名理科生。在前测-后测非等效组设计方面。后测得分均值高于前测。这意味着在学习过程中,通过学生的风格进行教学,学生的写作成绩有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Internalization Entrepreneurship Values of Students at Al Fahham Islamic Boarding School Purworejo Comparative Study of Poverty Alleviation in The Verses of The Qur’an and The Green Economy Program SGDS Urgensi Literasi Moderasi Beragama Dalam Ruang Bermedia Sosial Perspektif Al Qur’an Development of Religious Moderation Measurements Pengembangan Toleransi Beragama Siswa Melalui Aktivitas Pembelajaran di Kelas Dengan Metode Komunikatif
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1