A new sentence similarity assessment measure based on a three-layer sentence representation

Rafael Ferreira, R. Lins, F. Freitas, S. Simske, M. Riss
{"title":"A new sentence similarity assessment measure based on a three-layer sentence representation","authors":"Rafael Ferreira, R. Lins, F. Freitas, S. Simske, M. Riss","doi":"10.1145/2644866.2644881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentence similarity is used to measure the degree of likelihood between sentences. It is used in many natural language applications, such as text summarization, information retrieval, text categorization, and machine translation. The current methods for assessing sentence similarity represent sentences as vectors of bag of words or the syntactic information of the words in the sentence. The degree of likelihood between phrases is calculated by composing the similarity between the words in the sentences. Two important concerns in the area, the meaning problem and the word order, are not handled, however. This paper proposes a new sentence similarity assessment measure that largely improves and refines a recently published method that takes into account the lexical, syntactic and semantic components of sentences. The new method proposed here was benchmarked using a publically available standard dataset. The results obtained show that the new similarity assessment measure proposed outperforms the state of the art systems and achieve results comparable to the evaluation made by humans.","PeriodicalId":91385,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","volume":"13 1","pages":"25-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2644866.2644881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Sentence similarity is used to measure the degree of likelihood between sentences. It is used in many natural language applications, such as text summarization, information retrieval, text categorization, and machine translation. The current methods for assessing sentence similarity represent sentences as vectors of bag of words or the syntactic information of the words in the sentence. The degree of likelihood between phrases is calculated by composing the similarity between the words in the sentences. Two important concerns in the area, the meaning problem and the word order, are not handled, however. This paper proposes a new sentence similarity assessment measure that largely improves and refines a recently published method that takes into account the lexical, syntactic and semantic components of sentences. The new method proposed here was benchmarked using a publically available standard dataset. The results obtained show that the new similarity assessment measure proposed outperforms the state of the art systems and achieve results comparable to the evaluation made by humans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于三层句子表示的句子相似度评价方法
句子相似度用于衡量句子之间的似然程度。它用于许多自然语言应用程序,如文本摘要、信息检索、文本分类和机器翻译。目前的句子相似度评估方法将句子表示为词包向量或句子中词的句法信息。短语之间的似然度是通过组合句子中单词之间的相似度来计算的。然而,该领域的两个重要问题,即意义问题和语序问题,并没有得到解决。本文提出了一种新的句子相似度评估方法,该方法在很大程度上改进和完善了最近发表的一种考虑句子的词汇、句法和语义成分的方法。本文提出的新方法使用公开可用的标准数据集进行基准测试。结果表明,所提出的新的相似度评估方法优于现有的系统,并取得了与人类评估相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Notarial Archives, Valletta: Starting from Zero Truncation: all the news that fits we'll print Classifying and ranking search engine results as potential sources of plagiarism An ensemble approach for text document clustering using Wikipedia concepts Document changes: modeling, detection, storage and visualization (DChanges 2014)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1