The Ideology and Implementation of Aesthetic Education in Junior High School of Semarang Municipality

M. Rondhi, S. Soesanto, I. B. Sugiharto
{"title":"The Ideology and Implementation of Aesthetic Education in Junior High School of Semarang Municipality","authors":"M. Rondhi, S. Soesanto, I. B. Sugiharto","doi":"10.15294/jed.v6i2.22409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aesthetic education is an aspect of art education in schools whose implementation is very diverse. The diversity in the implementation is thought to be due to differences in the teacher’s ideology on aesthetic education. The teacher's perception of aesthetic education must be influenced by the ideology he/she embraces. Therefore, field research is needed to provide an explanation of the teacher’s ideology and the implementation of aesthetic education at school. Problems to be solved through this research were (1) how is the ideology and understanding of teacher’s art about aesthetic education and (2) how is the implementation of aesthetic education at school. This research utilized a qualitative approach with cultural ecology model. Data were collected by observation, interview, and documentation techniques. The target of this research was art and culture teachers of Junior High School in Semarang. The results showed that in carrying out the learning of art and culture all teachers refer to the school-based (KTSP) curriculum and the 2013 Curriculum. Almost all art and cultural teachers carry out the learning process in accordance with the guidelines of the curriculum although they still adjust to school conditions. According to the art and culture teachers, in fact, the substance of the two curricula is not very much different; both are based on students and learning strategies using a scientific approach. In addition to providing an aesthetic experience to students, art education is also very appropriate as a means of character education for the nation.","PeriodicalId":30829,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Educational Development","volume":"47 1","pages":"220-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jed.v6i2.22409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aesthetic education is an aspect of art education in schools whose implementation is very diverse. The diversity in the implementation is thought to be due to differences in the teacher’s ideology on aesthetic education. The teacher's perception of aesthetic education must be influenced by the ideology he/she embraces. Therefore, field research is needed to provide an explanation of the teacher’s ideology and the implementation of aesthetic education at school. Problems to be solved through this research were (1) how is the ideology and understanding of teacher’s art about aesthetic education and (2) how is the implementation of aesthetic education at school. This research utilized a qualitative approach with cultural ecology model. Data were collected by observation, interview, and documentation techniques. The target of this research was art and culture teachers of Junior High School in Semarang. The results showed that in carrying out the learning of art and culture all teachers refer to the school-based (KTSP) curriculum and the 2013 Curriculum. Almost all art and cultural teachers carry out the learning process in accordance with the guidelines of the curriculum although they still adjust to school conditions. According to the art and culture teachers, in fact, the substance of the two curricula is not very much different; both are based on students and learning strategies using a scientific approach. In addition to providing an aesthetic experience to students, art education is also very appropriate as a means of character education for the nation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三宝垄市初中美育的思想与实施
美育是学校艺术教育的一个方面,美育的实施是多种多样的。在实施上的差异被认为是由于教师的审美教育思想的差异。教师的美育观必然受到其所信奉的意识形态的影响。因此,需要通过实地调查来解释教师的思想和学校美育的实施。通过本研究要解决的问题是:(1)教师艺术对美育的意识形态和理解如何;(2)学校如何实施美育。本研究采用文化生态模型的定性研究方法。通过观察、访谈和文献技术收集数据。本研究以三宝垄市初中艺术文化教师为研究对象。结果表明,在进行艺术文化学习时,所有教师都参考了校本课程和2013年课程。几乎所有的文化艺术教师都是按照课程的指导方针进行学习过程的,尽管他们仍然需要适应学校的条件。据文艺课老师介绍,其实两门课程的内容并没有太大的区别;两者都以学生和学习策略为基础,采用科学的方法。除了为学生提供审美体验外,艺术教育也非常适合作为民族品格教育的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Case Study of Tutoring Middle School Underachieving English Learners for Solving Educational Gaps Syllabus Design for Participative Korean History Class A Study on Changes to School Violence Prevention Education and an Improvement Plan in accordance with Changes to School Violence Legislation and Policy The Methods of Process-Centered Evaluation Using Online Realtime Interactive Class -A Case of the Korean History Classes in High School- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Secondary School Students Toward COVID-19 Epidemic in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1