Mechanical Characterization of Grainstone and Dolomite Rock Samples from Quissamã Formation, Campos Basin

P. F. V. Garcia, D. F. Rossi, F. H. Ferreira, E. Santos, A. Borba
{"title":"Mechanical Characterization of Grainstone and Dolomite Rock Samples from Quissamã Formation, Campos Basin","authors":"P. F. V. Garcia, D. F. Rossi, F. H. Ferreira, E. Santos, A. Borba","doi":"10.4043/29770-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Results from mechanical tests on grainstone and dolomite wellcore samples obtained from the Quissamã formation are presented. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) logs obtained from scratch tests are compared to known relations. Elastic compressibility moduli, obtained from cyclic hydrostatic and oedometer compression tests, are compared to analytical formulation. Mohr-Coulomb strength envelopes are obtained from compressive tests, such as Brazilian tests, drained uniaxial compression and drained triaxial compression.\n The mechanical test campaign consisted of the following steps: 1) scratch test of three full wellcore sets from Quissamã formation to obtain UCS logs, 2) wholecore sampling for cylindrical rock plugging, 3) microtomography imaging of new cylindrical rock samples for internal structural integrity preview and 4) compression tests of plugged rock samples to obtain static elastic properties (Poisson's ratio, Young moduli, bulk moduli, grain compressibility moduli and oedometric compressibility moduli) and mechanical resistance properties (indirect tensile strength, drained UCS and drained confined compressive strength (CCS)). Experimental results were compared to literature UCS relations and analytical compressibility moduli formulation.\n It was possible to observe good concordance between UCS obtained from drained uniaxial compression tests and scratch testing profiles. Using the internal friction angle obtained from Mohr-Coulomb envelopes and the UCS results, it was possible to indirectly obtain an estimation of cohesion through Mohr-Coulomb criteria relations. Compressibility moduli obtained from experiments also were in good concordance with classical formulation for elastic deformation regime. In the end, the mechanical characterization campaign was succesful in obtaining resistance and elastic static properties for loading conditions and some unloading conditions.","PeriodicalId":10927,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29770-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Results from mechanical tests on grainstone and dolomite wellcore samples obtained from the Quissamã formation are presented. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) logs obtained from scratch tests are compared to known relations. Elastic compressibility moduli, obtained from cyclic hydrostatic and oedometer compression tests, are compared to analytical formulation. Mohr-Coulomb strength envelopes are obtained from compressive tests, such as Brazilian tests, drained uniaxial compression and drained triaxial compression. The mechanical test campaign consisted of the following steps: 1) scratch test of three full wellcore sets from Quissamã formation to obtain UCS logs, 2) wholecore sampling for cylindrical rock plugging, 3) microtomography imaging of new cylindrical rock samples for internal structural integrity preview and 4) compression tests of plugged rock samples to obtain static elastic properties (Poisson's ratio, Young moduli, bulk moduli, grain compressibility moduli and oedometric compressibility moduli) and mechanical resistance properties (indirect tensile strength, drained UCS and drained confined compressive strength (CCS)). Experimental results were compared to literature UCS relations and analytical compressibility moduli formulation. It was possible to observe good concordance between UCS obtained from drained uniaxial compression tests and scratch testing profiles. Using the internal friction angle obtained from Mohr-Coulomb envelopes and the UCS results, it was possible to indirectly obtain an estimation of cohesion through Mohr-Coulomb criteria relations. Compressibility moduli obtained from experiments also were in good concordance with classical formulation for elastic deformation regime. In the end, the mechanical characterization campaign was succesful in obtaining resistance and elastic static properties for loading conditions and some unloading conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坎波斯盆地Quissamã组颗粒岩和白云岩样品的力学特征
本文介绍了从Quissamã地层获得的颗粒岩和白云岩岩心样品的力学试验结果。无侧限抗压强度(UCS)日志从从头测试得到比较已知的关系。弹性压缩模量,从循环静压和里程表压缩试验,比较了解析公式。Mohr-Coulomb强度包络是通过压缩试验获得的,如巴西试验、排水单轴压缩和排水三轴压缩。机械测试活动包括以下步骤:1)对Quissamã地层的三套全岩心进行抓伤测试,获得UCS测井曲线;2)对柱状岩石封堵进行整岩心取样;3)对新柱状岩石样本进行微层析成像,以获得内部结构完整性预览;4)对封堵后的岩石样本进行压缩测试,获得静弹性特性(泊松比、杨氏模量、体积模量、颗粒压缩模量和尺寸压缩模量)和机械阻力性能(间接抗拉强度、排水UCS和排水侧限抗压强度(CCS))。实验结果与文献UCS关系式和解析压缩模公式进行了比较。从排水单轴压缩试验和划痕试验剖面中获得的UCS之间有可能观察到良好的一致性。利用Mohr-Coulomb包络线得到的内摩擦角和UCS结果,可以通过Mohr-Coulomb准则关系间接得到粘聚力的估计。实验得到的压缩模量也与经典的弹性变形公式吻合较好。最后,力学表征活动成功地获得了加载条件和一些卸载条件下的阻力和弹性静态性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Partnerships & Joint Ventures in Brazilian Oil and Gas Markets Remediation of Hydrate Plug in Gas Export Line – A West Africa Deep Water Case Study of the Effect of Low Salinity Water Injection on the Oil Recovery Factor in Fractured Carbonate Rocks Using Computed Tomography Gimbal Joint Riser: Enabling Free-Hanging and Buoyancy-Free Rigid Risers Flow Assurance Issues on Mexilhão Field Operation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1