{"title":"A Practical Guide to the Calculation of Uncertainty of Measurement","authors":"M. Zilli","doi":"10.2174/1874340401306010020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper would provide the analyst with an easy to use step-by-step guide to calculate the uncertainty of measurement in implementing a new analytical method. There are two main ways to attain such an achievement. The first is to consider all the possible sources of variability and then to sum up all of them in the final calculation. The second is taking part in a collaborative trial and processing the resulting statistics. Both methods imply different advantages and drawbacks. It is up the analyst to choose the one fits best his requirements. Anyway it is nearly inescapable providing, along with the test result, its own uncertainty. This entire subject is stated by a standard well known to those who practise the profession of a chemical analyst, which is the UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This standard has been imposed by the European Community for matters concerning food and environmental surveillance, but it has also become part of the guidelines of several National Associations of Clinical Toxicology. This standard pledges the analyst to use validated analytical methods, issued by one of the national or international Standards Organizations or, at least, by an internationally acknowledged Scientific Society.","PeriodicalId":22859,"journal":{"name":"The Open Toxicology Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Toxicology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874340401306010020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This paper would provide the analyst with an easy to use step-by-step guide to calculate the uncertainty of measurement in implementing a new analytical method. There are two main ways to attain such an achievement. The first is to consider all the possible sources of variability and then to sum up all of them in the final calculation. The second is taking part in a collaborative trial and processing the resulting statistics. Both methods imply different advantages and drawbacks. It is up the analyst to choose the one fits best his requirements. Anyway it is nearly inescapable providing, along with the test result, its own uncertainty. This entire subject is stated by a standard well known to those who practise the profession of a chemical analyst, which is the UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This standard has been imposed by the European Community for matters concerning food and environmental surveillance, but it has also become part of the guidelines of several National Associations of Clinical Toxicology. This standard pledges the analyst to use validated analytical methods, issued by one of the national or international Standards Organizations or, at least, by an internationally acknowledged Scientific Society.
本文将为分析人员在实施一种新的分析方法时计算测量不确定度提供一个易于使用的分步指南。有两种主要方法可以达到这样的成就。第一种方法是考虑所有可能的变率来源,然后在最后的计算中把所有的变率来源加起来。第二种是参与合作试验,并处理由此产生的统计数据。两种方法都有不同的优点和缺点。这取决于分析师选择一个最适合他的需求。无论如何,随着测试结果的出现,它几乎不可避免地提供了自身的不确定性。这整个主题是由那些从事化学分析专业的人所熟知的标准来陈述的,这就是UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005。这一标准由欧共体用于食品和环境监测,但它也成为几个国家临床毒理学协会指导方针的一部分。本标准保证分析人员使用由国家或国际标准组织或至少由国际公认的科学学会发布的经过验证的分析方法。