Using eDNA Metabarcoding for the Analysis of Fish Communities in Rivers

M. Yoon, Seung-Eun Oh, Yun-Suk Cho, H. Ahn, Min-Ji Kwak, Song-Hee Han, Tae-Hyun Kim, Kang-Hyuck Lee, S. Hong, Ju-Yong Jeong
{"title":"Using eDNA Metabarcoding for the Analysis of Fish Communities in Rivers","authors":"M. Yoon, Seung-Eun Oh, Yun-Suk Cho, H. Ahn, Min-Ji Kwak, Song-Hee Han, Tae-Hyun Kim, Kang-Hyuck Lee, S. Hong, Ju-Yong Jeong","doi":"10.36278/jeaht.26.2.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of eDNA metabarcoding for the analysis of fish communities in rivers. The findings suggest that the methodology attained an accuracy rate of 80% for species identification and was able to detect between 79.2% and 87.5% of the fish species recorded in the fish monitoring database for three rivers of Anseong, Bokha and Gyeongan during the period 2019 to 2021. Significantly, the eDNA metabarcoding technique enabled the successful detection of comparatively larger fish species, such as Channa argus and Silurus asotus. Furthermore, depending on the river, this method identified 12 to 14 additional species that could not be observed through traditional methodologies. However, it is worth noting that the Mifish primer used amplifies short gene segments, which can pose challenges in identifying species with identical gene sequences. Notwithstanding this limitation, the advantages of eDNA analysis over conventional methods are significant, enabling the identification of a broader range of species within a shorter timeframe, using smaller sample volumes and minimizing risks to both endangered fish and to researchers. As a result, eDNA analysis represents a valuable alternative for assessing biodiversity and for collecting data on fish species that are challenging to analyze.","PeriodicalId":15758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36278/jeaht.26.2.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of eDNA metabarcoding for the analysis of fish communities in rivers. The findings suggest that the methodology attained an accuracy rate of 80% for species identification and was able to detect between 79.2% and 87.5% of the fish species recorded in the fish monitoring database for three rivers of Anseong, Bokha and Gyeongan during the period 2019 to 2021. Significantly, the eDNA metabarcoding technique enabled the successful detection of comparatively larger fish species, such as Channa argus and Silurus asotus. Furthermore, depending on the river, this method identified 12 to 14 additional species that could not be observed through traditional methodologies. However, it is worth noting that the Mifish primer used amplifies short gene segments, which can pose challenges in identifying species with identical gene sequences. Notwithstanding this limitation, the advantages of eDNA analysis over conventional methods are significant, enabling the identification of a broader range of species within a shorter timeframe, using smaller sample volumes and minimizing risks to both endangered fish and to researchers. As a result, eDNA analysis represents a valuable alternative for assessing biodiversity and for collecting data on fish species that are challenging to analyze.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用eDNA元条形码分析河流鱼类群落
本研究旨在评估eDNA元条形码在河流鱼类群落分析中的有效性。结果表明,该方法对物种鉴定的准确率达到80%,对2019年至2021年期间安城、博夏和庆安三江鱼类监测数据库中记录的鱼类的检测准确率为79.2% ~ 87.5%。值得注意的是,eDNA元条形码技术能够成功地检测到相对较大的鱼类,如鲷鱼和Silurus asotus。此外,根据河流的不同,这种方法还发现了12至14种传统方法无法观察到的物种。然而,值得注意的是,所使用的Mifish引物扩增了短基因片段,这可能会给识别具有相同基因序列的物种带来挑战。尽管存在这些限制,eDNA分析相对于传统方法的优势是显著的,它能够在更短的时间内识别更广泛的物种,使用更小的样本量,并最大限度地降低对濒危鱼类和研究人员的风险。因此,eDNA分析为评估生物多样性和收集具有挑战性的鱼类物种数据提供了有价值的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds Distribution in Downtown Ansan Near Industrial Complexes Global Performance, Trends, and Challenges for Assessment and Management of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): A Critical Review Examination of the Utility of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Fish Species in Han Rivr, Korea Distribution and Risk Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the South Han River Analysis and Change in Concentration of Micropollutants in Stream Affected by WWTP Effluents using Portable Composite Sampler and LC-HRMS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1