Two Wings of Art Writing

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-10-45
V. Tiupa
{"title":"Two Wings of Art Writing","authors":"V. Tiupa","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-10-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the correlation between aesthetic and rhetorical aspects of artistic writing in a historical perspective. Before the “aesthetic revolution” of the 18th century, which was marked with the publication of Baumgarten’s Aestheticism, written language, while possessing an essentially creative potential, was conceived purely rhetorically, not as the creation of conditional holistic worlds, but as a textforming craft of a special kind. The discovery of the creative nature of art served as a powerful impulse for its development and shaped classical European artistry. A mental crisis of artistic culture at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries resulted in an imbalance between the aesthetic and rhetorical vectors of artistic writing. Avant-garde provocation, political engagement, and consumer fiction depreciated the aesthetic component of art from various angles. The critical discord between de-aestheticization of artistic writing and the rehabilitation of its aesthetic value was embedded in the formation of a theory of literature as a science, which took place in the polemic between “aesthetics of verbal creativity” by M.M. Bakhtin and purely rhetorical poetics of the formal school. This confrontation, which gave rise, in particular, to the phenomenon of “postmodernism,” continues to this day. It is in this confrontation that the fate of literature as an art of the word is decided.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litterarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-10-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the correlation between aesthetic and rhetorical aspects of artistic writing in a historical perspective. Before the “aesthetic revolution” of the 18th century, which was marked with the publication of Baumgarten’s Aestheticism, written language, while possessing an essentially creative potential, was conceived purely rhetorically, not as the creation of conditional holistic worlds, but as a textforming craft of a special kind. The discovery of the creative nature of art served as a powerful impulse for its development and shaped classical European artistry. A mental crisis of artistic culture at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries resulted in an imbalance between the aesthetic and rhetorical vectors of artistic writing. Avant-garde provocation, political engagement, and consumer fiction depreciated the aesthetic component of art from various angles. The critical discord between de-aestheticization of artistic writing and the rehabilitation of its aesthetic value was embedded in the formation of a theory of literature as a science, which took place in the polemic between “aesthetics of verbal creativity” by M.M. Bakhtin and purely rhetorical poetics of the formal school. This confrontation, which gave rise, in particular, to the phenomenon of “postmodernism,” continues to this day. It is in this confrontation that the fate of literature as an art of the word is decided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艺术写作的两翼
本文从历史的角度考察了艺术写作中美学与修辞的关系。在以鲍姆加滕的《唯美主义》出版为标志的18世纪“美学革命”之前,书面语言虽然具有本质上的创造潜力,但却被纯粹地视为修辞学,不是作为有条件的整体世界的创造,而是作为一种特殊的文本形成工艺。艺术创造性本质的发现为其发展提供了强大的推动力,并塑造了古典欧洲艺术。19世纪和20世纪之交艺术文化的精神危机导致了艺术写作的美学和修辞向量之间的不平衡。先锋派的挑衅、政治参与和消费小说从各个角度贬低了艺术的美学成分。艺术写作的去审美化与其审美价值的恢复之间的批判性矛盾,体现在文学作为一门科学的理论形成过程中,这种矛盾发生在巴赫金的“言语创造美学”与正式学派的纯粹修辞诗学之间的论战中。这种对抗,特别是产生了“后现代主义”现象,一直持续到今天。正是在这种对抗中,文学作为一种世界艺术的命运被决定了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Litterarum
Studia Litterarum LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Specific Features of Forming French-Language Literatures of Sub-Saharan Africa as the Regional Typological Commonness Esenin’s Poem “Us”: Materials for Historical and Literary Commentary Russian Chastushka (Ditties) vs Spanish Flamenco Verses: the Experience of Typological Comparison Genre and Style Structure of Expatriate Folklore Lyrics by Crimean Tatars (“The Song of Cool Water”) “Intertextuality” in the 12th Century: Marie de France and Chrétien de Troyes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1