Long-term contracts and the Unidroit PICC: towards a realistic regulation

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Uniform Law Review Pub Date : 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1093/ulr/unab026
Raúl F. Zúñiga Peralta
{"title":"Long-term contracts and the Unidroit PICC: towards a realistic regulation","authors":"Raúl F. Zúñiga Peralta","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unab026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The 2016 Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) were the first instrument that explicitly regulated long-term contracts in international commerce. Its main goal was to actualize uniform contract law for the emerging needs of international commerce. Despite this effort, scholars have briefly researched how uniform contract law instruments address international commerce as an economic reality or whether the PICC’s attempt is adequate. The gap in uniform contract law’s—particularly the PICC’s—literature on long-term contracts is odd compared to the completeness of economic literature on the matter. After revealing the pitfalls of the PICC’s regulation, demonstrating the convenience of a thorough review of the economics of long-term contracts, this article elaborates on the necessary character of the connection between uniform contract law and economics. It further reviews the economic research on the factors that prompt long-term contracting and the mechanisms that economic agents designed to address their needs. The overhaul reveals that two paradigmatic economic structures—competitive and cooperative—generally determine the design of long-term contracts. Finally, the article addresses the consequences of including the paradigmatic economic structures of long-term contracts in the PICC rules on contract interpretation and gap-filling.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"111 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unab026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2016 Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) were the first instrument that explicitly regulated long-term contracts in international commerce. Its main goal was to actualize uniform contract law for the emerging needs of international commerce. Despite this effort, scholars have briefly researched how uniform contract law instruments address international commerce as an economic reality or whether the PICC’s attempt is adequate. The gap in uniform contract law’s—particularly the PICC’s—literature on long-term contracts is odd compared to the completeness of economic literature on the matter. After revealing the pitfalls of the PICC’s regulation, demonstrating the convenience of a thorough review of the economics of long-term contracts, this article elaborates on the necessary character of the connection between uniform contract law and economics. It further reviews the economic research on the factors that prompt long-term contracting and the mechanisms that economic agents designed to address their needs. The overhaul reveals that two paradigmatic economic structures—competitive and cooperative—generally determine the design of long-term contracts. Finally, the article addresses the consequences of including the paradigmatic economic structures of long-term contracts in the PICC rules on contract interpretation and gap-filling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期合同与中国人保:走向现实的监管
2016年统一民商法协会《国际商事合同原则》(PICC)是第一个明确规范国际商务长期合同的文书。其主要目标是实现统一的合同法,以满足国际商业的新需要。尽管如此,学者们还是简要地研究了统一的合同法文书如何将国际贸易作为一种经济现实来处理,或者中国人保的尝试是否足够。统一合同法——尤其是中国人保——在长期合同方面的文献缺口,与经济文献的完备性相比,显得有些奇怪。在揭示了中国人保监管的缺陷,论证了全面审视长期合同经济学的便利性之后,本文阐述了统一合同法与经济学之间联系的必要特征。它进一步回顾了关于促使长期契约的因素和经济主体为满足其需要而设计的机制的经济研究。这项研究揭示了两种典型的经济结构——竞争和合作——通常决定了长期合同的设计。最后,本文讨论了将长期合同的范式经济结构纳入中国人民保险公司合同解释和空白填补规则的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Interpretation and application of the CISG by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia: an analysis of the judgment in the Boom Conveyor case Electronic enforcement in the digital era: Themis without a sword The Unidroit Principles and the Shari’ah Standards: any room for cooperation? Dealing with registrations and jurisdiction in aircraft financing Revolutionizing trade finance: leveraging the power of blockchain and AI in electronic letters of credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1