Focus leveling improvement using optimized wafer edge settings

IF 1.5 2区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1117/1.JMM.18.4.043505
Lucas Lamonds, Bryan Orf, Michael Frachel, X. Thrun, G. Erley, Philip Groeger, Alexander Muehle, B. Habets
{"title":"Focus leveling improvement using optimized wafer edge settings","authors":"Lucas Lamonds, Bryan Orf, Michael Frachel, X. Thrun, G. Erley, Philip Groeger, Alexander Muehle, B. Habets","doi":"10.1117/1.JMM.18.4.043505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Background: To reduce defocus from leveling errors at the wafer edge, modern exposure tools offer a broad range of advanced leveling controls. These additional degrees of freedom offer better leveling performance, but users hesitate to spend the tool time, wafers, and engineering hours necessary to find and maintain the optimal settings experimentally. Aim: In order to fully explore the potential of advanced leveling controls, an automated, fast simulation method should be introduced. Approach: Alternative set-point curves and resulting focus residuals are simulated from existing wafer height maps. Optimizations are carried out to obtain the best edge exclusion settings for several dynamic random access memory and NAND flash memory products, across different layers and exposure tools. The simulated focus errors are compared to the POR settings and verified with electrical results. Results: An efficient optimization algorithm was demonstrated and significant leveling improvements found for a number of use cases. The resulting settings vary substantially between different products, layers, and exposure tools. The impact of the improved leveling performance is verified using electrical data. Conclusions: The speed of the presented method proves crucial to help lithographers dial in and maintain numerous settings at optimal values across a typical production line.","PeriodicalId":16522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS","volume":"40 1","pages":"043505 - 043505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.18.4.043505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Background: To reduce defocus from leveling errors at the wafer edge, modern exposure tools offer a broad range of advanced leveling controls. These additional degrees of freedom offer better leveling performance, but users hesitate to spend the tool time, wafers, and engineering hours necessary to find and maintain the optimal settings experimentally. Aim: In order to fully explore the potential of advanced leveling controls, an automated, fast simulation method should be introduced. Approach: Alternative set-point curves and resulting focus residuals are simulated from existing wafer height maps. Optimizations are carried out to obtain the best edge exclusion settings for several dynamic random access memory and NAND flash memory products, across different layers and exposure tools. The simulated focus errors are compared to the POR settings and verified with electrical results. Results: An efficient optimization algorithm was demonstrated and significant leveling improvements found for a number of use cases. The resulting settings vary substantially between different products, layers, and exposure tools. The impact of the improved leveling performance is verified using electrical data. Conclusions: The speed of the presented method proves crucial to help lithographers dial in and maintain numerous settings at optimal values across a typical production line.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用优化的晶圆边缘设置来提高对焦水平
摘要背景:为了减少晶圆边缘的调平误差引起的散焦,现代曝光工具提供了广泛的高级调平控制。这些额外的自由度提供了更好的调平性能,但用户不愿意花费必要的工具时间、晶圆和工程时间来寻找和维护实验中的最佳设置。目的:为了充分挖掘先进调平控制的潜力,需要引入一种自动化、快速的仿真方法。方法:根据现有的晶圆高度图模拟可选的设定点曲线和产生的焦点残差。对几种动态随机存取存储器和NAND闪存产品进行了优化,以获得跨不同层和曝光工具的最佳边缘排除设置。将模拟的焦距误差与POR设置进行了比较,并与电学结果进行了验证。结果:证明了一个有效的优化算法,并在许多用例中发现了显著的水平改进。结果设置在不同的产品、图层和曝光工具之间有很大差异。利用电学数据验证了调平性能改善的影响。结论:所提出的方法的速度被证明是至关重要的,可以帮助光刻工在一条典型的生产线上拨号并保持众多设置在最佳值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
30.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rayleigh or Abbe? Origin and naming of the resolution formula of microlithography JM3 is Gone, Long Live JM3! Direct comparison of line edge roughness measurements by SEM and a metrological tilting-atomic force microscopy for reference metrology Resolution enhancement with source-wavelength optimization according to illumination angle in optical lithography Particle and pattern discriminant freeze-cleaning method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1