Medieval Representations of Abraham: Mockery as a Vehicle of Rational Enlightenment in Eleazar Ashkenazi ben Nathan ha-Bavli’s Revealer of Secrets

E. Lawee
{"title":"Medieval Representations of Abraham: Mockery as a Vehicle of Rational Enlightenment in Eleazar Ashkenazi ben Nathan ha-Bavli’s Revealer of Secrets","authors":"E. Lawee","doi":"10.1353/jqr.2022.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Portraits of Abraham often bear the distinctive stamp of their creators, a fact attested in spiritual biographies of the patriarch in medieval Jewish literature. An example is Abraham as portrayed in the pages of a Torah commentary by the fourteenth-century Maimonidean Eleazar Ashkenazi ben Nathan ha-Bavli. In step with Maimonidean models, this Abraham ardently cultivates noesis as the principal religious activity. At the same time, he puts himself in grave danger in order to promote a revolutionary monotheistic teaching. While often taking his bearings from Maimonides, Eleazar can imbue Maimonidean ideas and interpretations with new resonances and turn them in novel directions. In his account of Abraham’s career as a monotheist missionary, Eleazar portrays Abraham in a manner without Maimonidean precedent when he imputes to the patriarch the use of mockery as a device to breach idolatrous ignorance. Eleazar emulates Abraham’s use of ridicule in his campaign on rationality’s behalf. Yet where Eleazar’s Abraham uses mockery against pagan irrationality, Eleazar deploys it to deride fruits of the midrashic hermeneutic and its foremost medieval spokesperson, Rashi. Put otherwise, Eleazar ridicules midrashim that threaten to turn the divine word into a propagator of the sort of unscientific myths Abraham so heroically opposed. In so doing, he positions himself in a line of enlighteners standing at the perennial crossroads between rational religion and popular faith.","PeriodicalId":22606,"journal":{"name":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"697 - 730"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2022.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Portraits of Abraham often bear the distinctive stamp of their creators, a fact attested in spiritual biographies of the patriarch in medieval Jewish literature. An example is Abraham as portrayed in the pages of a Torah commentary by the fourteenth-century Maimonidean Eleazar Ashkenazi ben Nathan ha-Bavli. In step with Maimonidean models, this Abraham ardently cultivates noesis as the principal religious activity. At the same time, he puts himself in grave danger in order to promote a revolutionary monotheistic teaching. While often taking his bearings from Maimonides, Eleazar can imbue Maimonidean ideas and interpretations with new resonances and turn them in novel directions. In his account of Abraham’s career as a monotheist missionary, Eleazar portrays Abraham in a manner without Maimonidean precedent when he imputes to the patriarch the use of mockery as a device to breach idolatrous ignorance. Eleazar emulates Abraham’s use of ridicule in his campaign on rationality’s behalf. Yet where Eleazar’s Abraham uses mockery against pagan irrationality, Eleazar deploys it to deride fruits of the midrashic hermeneutic and its foremost medieval spokesperson, Rashi. Put otherwise, Eleazar ridicules midrashim that threaten to turn the divine word into a propagator of the sort of unscientific myths Abraham so heroically opposed. In so doing, he positions himself in a line of enlighteners standing at the perennial crossroads between rational religion and popular faith.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚伯拉罕的中世纪表现:嘲弄作为理性启蒙的载体在以利亚撒·阿什科纳兹本内森·哈·巴维利的秘密揭示者
摘要:亚伯拉罕的肖像往往带有其创作者的独特印记,这一事实在中世纪犹太文学的族长精神传记中得到了证明。一个例子是亚伯拉罕,在14世纪的迈蒙尼德派阿什肯纳兹本内森·哈·巴维利所写的托拉评论中。在迈蒙尼模式的步骤,这个亚伯拉罕热情地培养noesis作为主要的宗教活动。同时,他把自己置于极大的危险之中,以促进革命性的一神论教学。虽然经常从迈蒙尼德那里得到启示,但以利亚撒可以用新的共鸣来灌输迈蒙尼德的思想和解释,并将它们转向新的方向。在他描述亚伯拉罕作为一神教传教士的经历时,以利亚撒以一种迈蒙尼派没有先例的方式描绘了亚伯拉罕,他把嘲弄的使用归咎于族长,作为一种打破偶像崇拜无知的手段。以利亚撒模仿亚伯拉罕在为理性而战中使用的嘲笑。然而,当以利亚撒笔下的亚伯拉罕嘲弄异教徒的非理性时,以利亚撒却用它来嘲弄米德拉西解释学的成果及其最重要的中世纪发言人拉希。换句话说,以利亚撒嘲笑那些威胁要把神的话语变成非科学神话的传播者,亚伯拉罕如此英勇地反对这种神话。在这样做的过程中,他将自己定位为站在理性宗教和大众信仰之间的十字路口的启蒙者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hebrew Gomel: Space, Genre, Modernity Va-yo'el Moshe: The Most Anti-Zionist and Anti-Israeli Jewish Text in Modern Times The Mishnah's Reader: Reconsidering Literary Meaning New Science in Old Yiddish: Jewish Vernacular Science and Translation in Early Modern Europe Ya'qūb al-Qirqisānī's Twenty-Fifth through Thirty-Seventh Exegetical Principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1