Prosthetic Landscapes: Place and Placelessness in the Digitization of Memorials

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Future Anterior Pub Date : 2020-06-28 DOI:10.5749/futuante.15.2.0113
A. Gabrielian, Aroussiak Alison B. Hirsch
{"title":"Prosthetic Landscapes: Place and Placelessness in the Digitization of Memorials","authors":"A. Gabrielian, Aroussiak Alison B. Hirsch","doi":"10.5749/futuante.15.2.0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Can landscapes be moved? What does it mean for a landscape not to have a place when the former is often equated with the latter in geographical terms? The essay considers the relevance and resonance of place (and space) as related to landscapes of memory. By considering the increasing digitization of memory via the burgeoning geoweb, the authors aim to explore the future of memorial-making, which has long been a physical and material practice that treats site as a remnant of authenticity. While monuments often commemorate events that occurred elsewhere, landscapes themselves are frequently all that remains of histories long forgotten. The essay considers whether these landscapes can be captured, transported, and inscribed in the social imagination (as cultural memory) as an ex-situ experience. It concludes with three illustrative memorial propositions and emphasize how geospatial media might be harnessed in contemporary memorial-making to transport us virtually to sites of memory and transport memorial landscapes into the space of our everyday lives. These propositions rely on the adaptability and accretional nature of new media technologies to commemorate ongoing processes of loss. Rather than commemorate the singularity of sites as uniquely sacred, these technologies enable awareness of larger networks of memory that draw people together across geographies and \"chasms of difference.\"","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"1 1","pages":"112 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.15.2.0113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Can landscapes be moved? What does it mean for a landscape not to have a place when the former is often equated with the latter in geographical terms? The essay considers the relevance and resonance of place (and space) as related to landscapes of memory. By considering the increasing digitization of memory via the burgeoning geoweb, the authors aim to explore the future of memorial-making, which has long been a physical and material practice that treats site as a remnant of authenticity. While monuments often commemorate events that occurred elsewhere, landscapes themselves are frequently all that remains of histories long forgotten. The essay considers whether these landscapes can be captured, transported, and inscribed in the social imagination (as cultural memory) as an ex-situ experience. It concludes with three illustrative memorial propositions and emphasize how geospatial media might be harnessed in contemporary memorial-making to transport us virtually to sites of memory and transport memorial landscapes into the space of our everyday lives. These propositions rely on the adaptability and accretional nature of new media technologies to commemorate ongoing processes of loss. Rather than commemorate the singularity of sites as uniquely sacred, these technologies enable awareness of larger networks of memory that draw people together across geographies and "chasms of difference."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
假体景观:纪念馆数字化中的场所与无场所
摘要:景观可以移动吗?当前者在地理上常常等同于后者时,一个景观没有位置意味着什么?本文认为地点(和空间)的相关性和共鸣与记忆的景观有关。考虑到通过蓬勃发展的geoweb不断增加的记忆数字化,作者旨在探索纪念制作的未来,这是一种长期以来将场地视为真实性残余的物理和材料实践。虽然纪念碑通常是为了纪念发生在别处的事件,但风景本身往往是被遗忘已久的历史的遗迹。本文考虑了这些景观是否可以被捕捉、运输,并作为一种迁地体验被铭入社会想象(作为文化记忆)。它以三个说明性的纪念命题作结,并强调如何利用地理空间媒体在当代纪念制作中将我们虚拟地运送到记忆地点,并将纪念景观运送到我们的日常生活空间中。这些主张依赖于新媒体技术的适应性和增值性,以纪念正在进行的损失过程。这些技术并没有将遗址的独特性作为独特的神圣纪念,而是使人们意识到更大的记忆网络,这些网络将跨越地域和“差异的鸿沟”的人们聚集在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future Anterior
Future Anterior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Life and Death of Skanderbeg Square: A Chronicle of an Undoing Foretold, in a Hundred Years Slightly Disappointing Ruins and the Facades of Tourist Imagery Dirty Industry, Heritage, and the Erasure of Immigrant Pasts The Necessary Interlinking of Culture and Climate Change Heritage Conservation in Postcolonial India: Approaches and Challenges ed. by Manish Chalana and Ashima Krishna (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1