When bio is not green: the impacts of bumblebee translocation and invasion on native ecosystems.

Josefina Lohrmann
{"title":"When bio is not green: the impacts of bumblebee translocation and invasion on native ecosystems.","authors":"Josefina Lohrmann","doi":"10.1079/cabireviews202217006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n Adequate pollination is fundamental to optimize reproduction and yield of most flowering plants, including many staple food crops. Plants depending on insect pollination rely heavily on many wild species of solitary and social bees, and declines or absence of bees often hampers crop productivity, prompting supplementation of pollination services with managed bees. Though honeybees are the most widely deployed managed pollinators, many high-value crops are pollinated more efficiently by bumblebees (Bombus spp.), prompting domestication and commercial rearing of several species. This led to a blooming international trade that translocated species outside their native range, where they escaped management and invaded the ecosystems around their deployment sites. Here, we briefly review the history of bumblebee invasions and their main impacts on invaded ecosystems, and close by discussing alternatives to the use of commercially reared bumblebees to enhance crop pollination. As evidence of widespread negative effects on local ecosystems of bumblebee invasions builds up, bumblebee trade adds to the list of examples of \"biological\" strategies devised to solve agricultural problems that ended up being far from the \"green,\" eco-friendly solutions they were expected to be.","PeriodicalId":39273,"journal":{"name":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews202217006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Adequate pollination is fundamental to optimize reproduction and yield of most flowering plants, including many staple food crops. Plants depending on insect pollination rely heavily on many wild species of solitary and social bees, and declines or absence of bees often hampers crop productivity, prompting supplementation of pollination services with managed bees. Though honeybees are the most widely deployed managed pollinators, many high-value crops are pollinated more efficiently by bumblebees (Bombus spp.), prompting domestication and commercial rearing of several species. This led to a blooming international trade that translocated species outside their native range, where they escaped management and invaded the ecosystems around their deployment sites. Here, we briefly review the history of bumblebee invasions and their main impacts on invaded ecosystems, and close by discussing alternatives to the use of commercially reared bumblebees to enhance crop pollination. As evidence of widespread negative effects on local ecosystems of bumblebee invasions builds up, bumblebee trade adds to the list of examples of "biological" strategies devised to solve agricultural problems that ended up being far from the "green," eco-friendly solutions they were expected to be.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当生物不是绿色的:大黄蜂迁移和入侵对本地生态系统的影响。
充分的授粉是优化开花植物繁殖和产量的基础,包括许多主要粮食作物。依赖昆虫授粉的植物严重依赖许多野生的独居和群居蜜蜂,而蜜蜂的减少或缺乏往往会影响作物生产力,因此需要有管理的蜜蜂来补充授粉服务。虽然蜜蜂是最广泛使用的传粉媒介,但许多高价值作物是由大黄蜂(Bombus spp.)更有效地授粉的,这促使了一些物种的驯化和商业饲养。这导致了蓬勃发展的国际贸易,将物种转移到它们的原生范围之外,在那里它们逃脱了管理,入侵了它们部署地点周围的生态系统。在此,我们简要回顾了大黄蜂入侵的历史及其对入侵生态系统的主要影响,并讨论了利用商业饲养的大黄蜂来增强作物授粉的替代方案。随着大黄蜂入侵对当地生态系统产生广泛负面影响的证据越来越多,大黄蜂贸易又增加了一个“生物”策略的例子,这些策略旨在解决农业问题,但最终与预期的“绿色”、生态友好的解决方案背道而驰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Agricultural impacts of climate change in India and potential adaptations Rights-based approaches and Indigenous peoples and local communities: Findings from a literature review A narrative review of current perspectives on urinary tract infections in dogs and cats Porcine circoviruses in Malaysia Improvement in operator safety for low- and middle-income countries: A user-friendly, consistent risk assessment and mitigation process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1