Identification of priority areas for soil erosion control based on minimum administrative units and karst landforms in karst areas of Guizhou

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Progress in Physical Geography-Earth and Environment Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1177/03091333231189350
Jun Jing, Rui Li, Yushan Zhang, Qinglin Wu
{"title":"Identification of priority areas for soil erosion control based on minimum administrative units and karst landforms in karst areas of Guizhou","authors":"Jun Jing, Rui Li, Yushan Zhang, Qinglin Wu","doi":"10.1177/03091333231189350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil erosion is one of the most serious ecological threats in karst areas of Southwest China. The identification of priority areas for remediation and its driving factors is essential to improving the efficiency of prevention and control. The present study systematically considered natural and socio-economic factors not involved in the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) model, and determined priority areas for soil erosion management based on minimum administrative units and karst landforms. Then, the driving factors were identified by using geographic detector. The results showed that the priority areas were mainly concentrated in the southwest, southeast and northeast, overlapping with the severely eroded areas (Erosion rate=45.79 t·ha−1·a−1). Gradient risk zones had geomorphological differences, but the most eroded zones were all controlled by bedrock exposure rates, elevation, or slope position. The spatial correlation and high erosion rate of priority areas provided opportunities to optimize the efficiency and cost of control. Driving factors were affected by karst landforms. The explanation power of slope position on soil erosion was higher in the peak cluster depressions and karst basins with small undulations ([Formula: see text]), while the karst gorges, trough valleys and plateaus with large undulations gradually decreased ([Formula: see text]). The interaction of driving factors will enhance the explanatory power for soil erosion. Among them, the repetition rate of elevation was 60%, and the repetition rate of lithology and development index was 40%. This study provides useful information for identifying and managing priority areas for soil erosion control, and enriches the theory of soil and water conservation in karst areas.","PeriodicalId":49659,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Physical Geography-Earth and Environment","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Physical Geography-Earth and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333231189350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil erosion is one of the most serious ecological threats in karst areas of Southwest China. The identification of priority areas for remediation and its driving factors is essential to improving the efficiency of prevention and control. The present study systematically considered natural and socio-economic factors not involved in the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) model, and determined priority areas for soil erosion management based on minimum administrative units and karst landforms. Then, the driving factors were identified by using geographic detector. The results showed that the priority areas were mainly concentrated in the southwest, southeast and northeast, overlapping with the severely eroded areas (Erosion rate=45.79 t·ha−1·a−1). Gradient risk zones had geomorphological differences, but the most eroded zones were all controlled by bedrock exposure rates, elevation, or slope position. The spatial correlation and high erosion rate of priority areas provided opportunities to optimize the efficiency and cost of control. Driving factors were affected by karst landforms. The explanation power of slope position on soil erosion was higher in the peak cluster depressions and karst basins with small undulations ([Formula: see text]), while the karst gorges, trough valleys and plateaus with large undulations gradually decreased ([Formula: see text]). The interaction of driving factors will enhance the explanatory power for soil erosion. Among them, the repetition rate of elevation was 60%, and the repetition rate of lithology and development index was 40%. This study provides useful information for identifying and managing priority areas for soil erosion control, and enriches the theory of soil and water conservation in karst areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于最小行政单元和喀斯特地貌的贵州喀斯特地区水土流失防治重点区域确定
水土流失是西南喀斯特地区最严重的生态威胁之一。确定修复的重点领域及其驱动因素对提高防治效率至关重要。本研究系统地考虑了修正的通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)模型中未涉及的自然和社会经济因素,并基于最小行政单位和喀斯特地貌确定了土壤侵蚀管理的优先区域。然后,利用地理探测器识别驱动因素。结果表明:优先区主要集中在西南、东南和东北,与侵蚀严重区重叠(侵蚀速率为45.79 t·ha−1·a−1);坡度风险区存在地貌差异,但侵蚀最严重的风险区均受基岩暴露率、高程或坡位控制。优先区域的空间相关性和高侵蚀率为优化控制效率和成本提供了机会。驱动因素受喀斯特地貌的影响。坡位对土壤侵蚀的解释力在波幅较小的峰簇洼地和岩溶盆地中较高([公式:见文]),而在波幅较大的岩溶峡谷、槽谷和高原中逐渐降低([公式:见文])。驱动因子的相互作用将增强土壤侵蚀的解释力。其中,高程重复率为60%,岩性和发育指数重复率为40%。该研究为确定和管理喀斯特地区水土流失防治重点区域提供了有益的信息,丰富了喀斯特地区水土保持理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Physical Geography is a peer-reviewed, international journal, encompassing an interdisciplinary approach incorporating the latest developments and debates within Physical Geography and interrelated fields across the Earth, Biological and Ecological System Sciences.
期刊最新文献
A review of flash flood hazards influenced by various solid material sources in mountain environment An excess-work approach to assessing channel instability potential within urban streams of Chicago, Illinois: Relative importance of spatial variability in hydraulic conditions and stormwater mitigation Long-term ecological studies on the oxbow ecosystems development and fire history in the Drava river valley (Central Europe): Implications for ecological restoration Fluvial encounters: Experimenting with a ‘River’s voice’ amidst light-based datafication Identification, computation, and mapping of anthropogenic landforms in urban areas: Case studies in the historical centre of Genoa, Italy (UNESCO World Heritage)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1