Introductory Chapter: Blood Groups - From Past to the Future

A. Tombak
{"title":"Introductory Chapter: Blood Groups - From Past to the Future","authors":"A. Tombak","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because we know there are different blood groups today, doctors can save lives by transferring the right blood to patients. But previously, the blood transfusion was just a dream. This idea was first discussed by the doctors at the time of Renaissance. In later periods, a French doctor transfused calf blood to a patient in the 1600s and the patient died. Of course, blood transfusions which were made unaware of the presence of antigenic differences ended with death. Because of such unsuccessful trials, the blood transfusion gained a bad reputation. In 1817, Dr. James Blundell, an English obstetrician, said that living species had different blood structures, so blood could not be transfused between different species, but only human blood could be given to a human. In the following years, a total of 10 blood transfusions were performed, of which only 4 survived. Dr. Blundell did not know that human blood had different antigens, and people should be transfused with the same blood group antigens. And probably, this was the cause of death in some patients.","PeriodicalId":7809,"journal":{"name":"Animal blood groups and biochemical genetics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal blood groups and biochemical genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because we know there are different blood groups today, doctors can save lives by transferring the right blood to patients. But previously, the blood transfusion was just a dream. This idea was first discussed by the doctors at the time of Renaissance. In later periods, a French doctor transfused calf blood to a patient in the 1600s and the patient died. Of course, blood transfusions which were made unaware of the presence of antigenic differences ended with death. Because of such unsuccessful trials, the blood transfusion gained a bad reputation. In 1817, Dr. James Blundell, an English obstetrician, said that living species had different blood structures, so blood could not be transfused between different species, but only human blood could be given to a human. In the following years, a total of 10 blood transfusions were performed, of which only 4 survived. Dr. Blundell did not know that human blood had different antigens, and people should be transfused with the same blood group antigens. And probably, this was the cause of death in some patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导论章:血型-从过去到未来
因为我们知道现在有不同的血型,医生可以通过给病人输送合适的血液来挽救生命。但在此之前,输血只是一个梦想。这个想法最早是在文艺复兴时期由医生们讨论的。在后来的时期,一位法国医生在17世纪给一位病人输血,病人死亡。当然,不知道存在抗原差异的输血以死亡告终。由于这些不成功的试验,输血获得了坏名声。1817年,英国产科医生詹姆斯·布伦德尔(James Blundell)博士说,现存物种的血液结构不同,因此不同物种之间不能输血,只能给人类输血。在接下来的几年里,总共进行了10次输血,其中只有4次存活。布伦德尔不知道人类血液中有不同的抗原,人们应该输入相同血型的抗原。很可能,这就是一些病人死亡的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Transfusion Reactions A New Alternative Approach for RhD Incompatibility; Determination Fetal RhD Status via Biosensor Technology Introductory Chapter: Blood Groups - From Past to the Future ABO Blood Group Antigens as a Model of Studying Protein-Protein Interactions Abstracts of papers read at the 19th International Conference on Animal Blood Groups and Biochemical Polymorphisms. (Göttingen, FRG, 22-27 July 1984).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1