Alignment but not Alliance: Nordic Operational Military Cooperation

Q1 Social Sciences Arctic Review on Law and Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.23865/arctic.v13.3380
Håkon Lunde Saxi
{"title":"Alignment but not Alliance: Nordic Operational Military Cooperation","authors":"Håkon Lunde Saxi","doi":"10.23865/arctic.v13.3380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the start of the Ukrainian crisis in 2014, the Nordic states have sought to advance their defence cooperation “beyond peacetime” to also encompass operational military cooperation in crisis and armed conflict. Relations between the two Nordic non-NATO members, Sweden and Finland, have formed a vanguard, encompassing bilateral operational planning beyond peacetime. While no formal security policy guarantees have been exchanged, Sweden and Finland have created strong expectations that they will lend each other support in a crisis. In short, while no formal alliance treaty exists, the two states have nevertheless become closely aligned. In 2020, Sweden and Finland joined NATO member Norway in signalling their intention to strengthen their trilateral defence relationship. The following year, NATO members Norway and Denmark signed a similar agreement with Sweden. The goal of these documents was to coordinate their national operational plans – their “war plans” – and perhaps develop some common operational plans. In this article, it is argued that these agreements fall short of a formal military alliance, but that they represent an alignment policy between the Nordic states.","PeriodicalId":36694,"journal":{"name":"Arctic Review on Law and Politics","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic Review on Law and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Since the start of the Ukrainian crisis in 2014, the Nordic states have sought to advance their defence cooperation “beyond peacetime” to also encompass operational military cooperation in crisis and armed conflict. Relations between the two Nordic non-NATO members, Sweden and Finland, have formed a vanguard, encompassing bilateral operational planning beyond peacetime. While no formal security policy guarantees have been exchanged, Sweden and Finland have created strong expectations that they will lend each other support in a crisis. In short, while no formal alliance treaty exists, the two states have nevertheless become closely aligned. In 2020, Sweden and Finland joined NATO member Norway in signalling their intention to strengthen their trilateral defence relationship. The following year, NATO members Norway and Denmark signed a similar agreement with Sweden. The goal of these documents was to coordinate their national operational plans – their “war plans” – and perhaps develop some common operational plans. In this article, it is argued that these agreements fall short of a formal military alliance, but that they represent an alignment policy between the Nordic states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结盟而非联盟:北欧军事行动合作
自2014年乌克兰危机爆发以来,北欧国家一直在寻求推进防务合作“超越和平时期”,将危机和武装冲突中的军事合作纳入其中。瑞典和芬兰这两个北欧非北约成员国之间的关系已经形成了先锋队,包括超越和平时期的双边行动计划。虽然两国没有交换正式的安全政策保证,但瑞典和芬兰已经产生了强烈的期望,即它们将在危机中相互提供支持。简而言之,虽然没有正式的联盟条约,但两国已经紧密结盟。2020年,瑞典和芬兰加入北约成员国挪威的行列,表示有意加强三边防务关系。次年,北约成员国挪威和丹麦与瑞典签署了类似的协议。这些文件的目的是协调他们的国家行动计划——他们的“战争计划”——也许是制定一些共同的行动计划。本文认为,这些协议不是正式的军事联盟,而是北欧国家之间的结盟政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Arctic Review on Law and Politics Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Residence Permit Appeals at the Administrative Courts of Finland: Acquiescence Bias by Legalised Judicial Injustices in Finland EU Engagement in the Arctic: Challenges to Achieving Ambitions in an Area outside Its Jurisdiction War in Europe, but Still Low Tension in the High North? An Analysis of Norwegian Mitigation Strategies Welcome to Another Demanding and Exiting Year Small States in World Politics: Norwegian Interests and Foreign Policy Challenges in the Arctic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1