Between Troubles and Peace in Northern Ireland: Cinematic Divisions in Kenneth Branagh’s Belfast (2021) and Terry Loane’s Mickybo and Me (2004)

IF 0.1 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Acta Universitatis Sapientiae-Film and Media Studies Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.2478/ausfm-2022-0014
Andreea Paris-Popa
{"title":"Between Troubles and Peace in Northern Ireland: Cinematic Divisions in Kenneth Branagh’s Belfast (2021) and Terry Loane’s Mickybo and Me (2004)","authors":"Andreea Paris-Popa","doi":"10.2478/ausfm-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Troubles officially ended with the Good Friday Agreement of 1998, but the conflict left such profound scars in the history of the region that making a film about Northern Ireland tends to almost automatically assume a discourse informed by division. The question that arises, then, is how this context may be tackled so as to simultaneously do justice to its traditionally rendered black-and-white reality and offer a more complex, contemporary understanding of the past that embraces reconciliation, openness and multiplicity of perspectives. Thus, the paper offers a close analysis of multiple types of division featured in Kenneth Branagh’s Belfast (2021) and Terry Loane’s Mickybo and Me (2004) by making use of John Hill’s and Fiona Coffey’s theoretical categorizations that distinguish traditional Troubles productions from the more recent Peace Process cinema. This genre-based inquiry allows for a probing of the films’ positioning in relation to the Troubles paradigm, as well as a revealing of difference at the heart of two otherwise very similar films, whose employment of conventional vocabulary may not allow for their unproblematic alignment with the politics of peace.","PeriodicalId":40721,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae-Film and Media Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae-Film and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausfm-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Troubles officially ended with the Good Friday Agreement of 1998, but the conflict left such profound scars in the history of the region that making a film about Northern Ireland tends to almost automatically assume a discourse informed by division. The question that arises, then, is how this context may be tackled so as to simultaneously do justice to its traditionally rendered black-and-white reality and offer a more complex, contemporary understanding of the past that embraces reconciliation, openness and multiplicity of perspectives. Thus, the paper offers a close analysis of multiple types of division featured in Kenneth Branagh’s Belfast (2021) and Terry Loane’s Mickybo and Me (2004) by making use of John Hill’s and Fiona Coffey’s theoretical categorizations that distinguish traditional Troubles productions from the more recent Peace Process cinema. This genre-based inquiry allows for a probing of the films’ positioning in relation to the Troubles paradigm, as well as a revealing of difference at the heart of two otherwise very similar films, whose employment of conventional vocabulary may not allow for their unproblematic alignment with the politics of peace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北爱尔兰的动乱与和平之间:肯尼斯·布拉纳的《贝尔法斯特》(2021)和特里·洛恩的《米奇博和我》(2004)的电影分歧
1998年《耶稣受难日协议》正式结束了北爱尔兰问题,但这场冲突在该地区的历史上留下了如此深刻的伤疤,以至于拍摄一部关于北爱尔兰的电影几乎会自动采用一种分裂的话语。因此,出现的问题是,如何处理这一背景,以便同时公正地对待传统上呈现的黑白现实,并提供对过去的更复杂、更现代的理解,包括和解、开放和多种观点。因此,本文对肯尼斯·布拉纳的《贝尔法斯特》(2021)和特里·洛恩的《米奇博和我》(2004)中出现的多种类型的分裂进行了仔细分析,利用约翰·希尔和菲奥娜·科菲的理论分类,将传统的《麻烦》电影与最近的《和平进程》电影区分开来。这种以类型为基础的探究可以探究电影与“麻烦”范式的定位,也可以揭示两部非常相似的电影的核心差异,它们使用的传统词汇可能不允许它们与和平政治毫无疑问地保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Stakeholder Spectrum. The History and the Current State of Participatory Film in Hungary Immanence, Ethics and Dystopia in The Lobster by Yorgos Lanthimos You-Too: Mental Hygiene Methodology for College-Age Students Dance and the Mediated Immersive Flux in Carlos Saura’s Musical Hybrids with Live Feed The Camera as a Social Catalyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1