Taking the High Road: Comments on Maya J. Goldenberg, Vaccine Hesitancy:Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science

M. Solomon
{"title":"Taking the High Road: Comments on Maya J. Goldenberg, Vaccine Hesitancy:Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science","authors":"M. Solomon","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goldenberg is calling for a \"meeting of minds\": a human encounter between the public health leadership and vaccine hesitators through a respectful engagement that interprets what vaccine hesitators say and do charitably, with an openness to differences in values. At the same time, we are also familiar with the ways in which COVID-19 vaccine hesitators are apparently willing to trust the medical establishment and even the same pharmaceutical companies as produced the vaccine when they become ill from COVID-19. For example, Goldenberg thinks that parental concerns that their child is \"too sickly\" for the vaccine, and that the vaccine presents a greater risk for them than the disease in a mostly vaccinated society may be legitimate (32-34). [Extracted from the article] Copyright of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"2 1","pages":"100 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Goldenberg is calling for a "meeting of minds": a human encounter between the public health leadership and vaccine hesitators through a respectful engagement that interprets what vaccine hesitators say and do charitably, with an openness to differences in values. At the same time, we are also familiar with the ways in which COVID-19 vaccine hesitators are apparently willing to trust the medical establishment and even the same pharmaceutical companies as produced the vaccine when they become ill from COVID-19. For example, Goldenberg thinks that parental concerns that their child is "too sickly" for the vaccine, and that the vaccine presents a greater risk for them than the disease in a mostly vaccinated society may be legitimate (32-34). [Extracted from the article] Copyright of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走正道:评论玛雅J.戈登伯格,疫苗犹豫:公众信任,专业知识和对科学的战争
Goldenberg呼吁“思想交流”:公共卫生领导人和疫苗犹豫者之间通过尊重的接触进行面对面的接触,以开放的态度解释疫苗犹豫者的言行。与此同时,我们也熟悉COVID-19疫苗犹豫者在生病时显然愿意信任医疗机构甚至生产疫苗的同一家制药公司的方式。例如,Goldenberg认为,父母担心他们的孩子“病得太重”,不适合接种疫苗,而且在一个大多数接种疫苗的社会中,疫苗对他们的风险比疾病更大,这可能是合理的(32-34)。《国际女性主义生物伦理学研究期刊》版权归多伦多大学出版社所有,未经版权所有者明确书面许可,其内容不得复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到listserv。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参阅原始出版版本的材料的完整。(版权适用于所有人。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Being an Anorectic versus Having Anorexia: Should the DSM Diagnostic Criteria Be Modified? Diagnosing Desire: Biopolitics and Femininity into the Twenty-First Century by Alyson K. Spurgas (review) Introduction to the Symposium on Daniel Groll's Conceiving People Significant Interests and the Right to Know Being the Right Kind of Parent: Conceiving People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1