{"title":"On Jovan Sterija Popovic‘s conception of the language of pseudoscience propounded in the play Sudbina jednog razuma [The Destiny of One’s Reason]","authors":"I. Ivanova","doi":"10.2298/jfi2101029i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the play Sudbina jednog razuma [The Destiny of One?s Reason] by Jovan Sterija Popovic is analysed as displaying a specific continuation and climax of the debates about Milovan Spasic?s textbook titled Zemljeopisanije celog svjeta [The Geography of the Whole World] (1845). More specifically, the focus of the investigation is placed upon those aspects of the debates in question which concern the tendencies in building the scientific register of the Serbian literary language. In this context, I reach the conclusion that Sterija?s unique sense of humour is adopted as a means of revealing one complex conception of pseudoscience and science, as representing two types of thinking activity which are mutually exclusive. In turn, the article also analyses Jovan Sterija Popovic?s views about the functional differentiation of language regarding its objectives and use, as well as the particularities of the scientific style of the national literary language concerning its intellectualisation on the syntactic and terminological levels.","PeriodicalId":30153,"journal":{"name":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/jfi2101029i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, the play Sudbina jednog razuma [The Destiny of One?s Reason] by Jovan Sterija Popovic is analysed as displaying a specific continuation and climax of the debates about Milovan Spasic?s textbook titled Zemljeopisanije celog svjeta [The Geography of the Whole World] (1845). More specifically, the focus of the investigation is placed upon those aspects of the debates in question which concern the tendencies in building the scientific register of the Serbian literary language. In this context, I reach the conclusion that Sterija?s unique sense of humour is adopted as a means of revealing one complex conception of pseudoscience and science, as representing two types of thinking activity which are mutually exclusive. In turn, the article also analyses Jovan Sterija Popovic?s views about the functional differentiation of language regarding its objectives and use, as well as the particularities of the scientific style of the national literary language concerning its intellectualisation on the syntactic and terminological levels.
在这篇文章中,戏剧Sudbina jednog razuma[一个人的命运?波波维奇的《理性》被分析为展示了关于米洛万·斯帕西奇的辩论的特定延续和高潮。1845年出版的教科书《整个世界的地理》。更具体地说,调查的重点放在有关辩论的那些方面,这些方面涉及建立塞尔维亚文学语言科学登记的趋势。在这种情况下,我得出结论,Sterija?S独特的幽默感被用来揭示伪科学和科学的一个复杂概念,作为两种相互排斥的思维活动的代表。反过来,文章也分析了波波维奇?从语言的目的和用途看语言的功能分化,以及民族文学语言的科学风格在句法和术语层面上的智力化的特殊性。