Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language

Maja Krstic
{"title":"Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language","authors":"Maja Krstic","doi":"10.2298/jfi2301159k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this research are verbs with destructive semantics in the Russian language, which are characterized by a paradigmatic defect. Verbs with a destructive meaning form one of the most numerous subgroups within the group of verbs with a paradigmatic defect. The semantic category of destructiveness, which denotes it in the broadest sense, has not yet received a comprehensive description in linguistics. A paradigmatic (systemic) defect is caused by a semantic mismatch between a certain grammeme and the lexical meaning of the lexeme. The given verbs have a two-part paradigm, and the impossibillity of using them in the other persons most often happens due to semantic barriers. They denote an action that is not related to a person as the doer of the action, but most often represents processes, states, and phenomena characteristic of the animal or plant world, etc. ? verb of destructiveness denotes an action with the meaning of ?decomposition?, ?deterioration?. Within the group of verbs with such semantics, we distinguished several subgroups: (1) verbs with the meaning of ?spoil?; (2) verbs with the meaning of ?disappear?; (3) verbs with the meaning of destruction, disintegration and (4) verbs with the meaning ?to cause damage?, ?to damage?. As the semantics of destructiveness primarily refers to phenomena or objects, there is almost no need to use other persons within the paradigm of these verbs.","PeriodicalId":30153,"journal":{"name":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/jfi2301159k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this research are verbs with destructive semantics in the Russian language, which are characterized by a paradigmatic defect. Verbs with a destructive meaning form one of the most numerous subgroups within the group of verbs with a paradigmatic defect. The semantic category of destructiveness, which denotes it in the broadest sense, has not yet received a comprehensive description in linguistics. A paradigmatic (systemic) defect is caused by a semantic mismatch between a certain grammeme and the lexical meaning of the lexeme. The given verbs have a two-part paradigm, and the impossibillity of using them in the other persons most often happens due to semantic barriers. They denote an action that is not related to a person as the doer of the action, but most often represents processes, states, and phenomena characteristic of the animal or plant world, etc. ? verb of destructiveness denotes an action with the meaning of ?decomposition?, ?deterioration?. Within the group of verbs with such semantics, we distinguished several subgroups: (1) verbs with the meaning of ?spoil?; (2) verbs with the meaning of ?disappear?; (3) verbs with the meaning of destruction, disintegration and (4) verbs with the meaning ?to cause damage?, ?to damage?. As the semantics of destructiveness primarily refers to phenomena or objects, there is almost no need to use other persons within the paradigm of these verbs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄语中具有缺陷范式的破坏动词
本研究以俄语中具有破坏性语义的动词为研究对象,这些动词具有典型的范式缺陷。具有破坏性意义的动词是具有聚合缺陷的动词群中数量最多的一个子群。破坏性的语义范畴是最广泛意义上的破坏性,在语言学中尚未得到全面的描述。范式(系统)缺陷是指某一语法与词汇的语义不匹配所造成的。给定的动词具有两部分范式,由于语义障碍,不可能在其他人身上使用它们。它们表示一种行为,与作为行为者的人无关,但最常表示动物或植物世界的过程、状态和现象特征等。destructivity的动词表示具有分解意思的行为。恶化?。在具有这种语义的动词组中,我们区分了几个子组:(1)具有“破坏”意思的动词;(2)带有“消失”意思的动词;(3)表示破坏、解体的动词;(4)表示造成损害的动词;,损坏?由于破坏性的语义主要指的是现象或物体,因此在这些动词的范式中几乎没有必要使用其他人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Linguoculturological aspects of the lexeme cat in the Serbian language Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language The specificity of dialectal word formation - some methodological and other remarks An example of the variant suffixes -ica and -ka in feminatives derived from masculine words ending in -or and -ator Lexical factors in the allocation of unique morphemes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1