{"title":"Romanticism in the Age of World Wars: Introduction to the Forum","authors":"Brecht Groote, O. D. Graef","doi":"10.1353/pan.2022.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps more than any other era in literary historiography, Romanticism is defined by war; its pivotal dates anchored in key junctures of wars then raging in the background. The commonly accepted system of dating Romanticism thus alleges that the period properly started as new modes of thought and expression took root following the French Revolution of 1789, developed through the ensuing seven Wars of the Coalitions from 1792, and began to peter out when the latter ended in 1815, to conclude entirely around 1830. The Battle of Waterloo on June 18, 1815, serves as a convenient turning point, typically taken to signpost the transition from wartime to peacetime: it defined the nature of modern warfare in an event of unprecedented and unrepeated proportions, involving some “200,000 men . . . on a scrap of land barely four kilometers (2.5 miles) square; never, either before or after, have such a great number of soldiers been massed on so circumscribed a battlefield” (Barbero 311). A landmark moment in the history of modern war, Waterloo can also be read as signaling the decline of Romanticism. From about 1815, Romantic thought is seen to divide against itself; into a precursor phase of confident, self-possessed production, followed by a secondary wind-down period marked by hesitant, self-deprecating reproduction (Nemoianu). This oft-alleged deflation of Romanticism following the conclusion of hostilities in 1815 holds a disquieting implication: war appears to be a necessary condition for Romanticism to inhabit itself fully. As Samuel Taylor Coleridge pointedly observes in his 1798 poem “Fears in Solitude,” Romantic poetry originates in war, which exercises the passions and the imagination as it is brought home through a fast-expanding machinery of periodical publication. In Coleridge’s reading, Romantic literature operates an aesthetic ideology which converts violence and conflict into bracing messages of sympathetic national unity, leaving behind the realities of war as a destabilizing if largely unobserved remainder:","PeriodicalId":42435,"journal":{"name":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","volume":"699 1","pages":"55 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2022.0000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Perhaps more than any other era in literary historiography, Romanticism is defined by war; its pivotal dates anchored in key junctures of wars then raging in the background. The commonly accepted system of dating Romanticism thus alleges that the period properly started as new modes of thought and expression took root following the French Revolution of 1789, developed through the ensuing seven Wars of the Coalitions from 1792, and began to peter out when the latter ended in 1815, to conclude entirely around 1830. The Battle of Waterloo on June 18, 1815, serves as a convenient turning point, typically taken to signpost the transition from wartime to peacetime: it defined the nature of modern warfare in an event of unprecedented and unrepeated proportions, involving some “200,000 men . . . on a scrap of land barely four kilometers (2.5 miles) square; never, either before or after, have such a great number of soldiers been massed on so circumscribed a battlefield” (Barbero 311). A landmark moment in the history of modern war, Waterloo can also be read as signaling the decline of Romanticism. From about 1815, Romantic thought is seen to divide against itself; into a precursor phase of confident, self-possessed production, followed by a secondary wind-down period marked by hesitant, self-deprecating reproduction (Nemoianu). This oft-alleged deflation of Romanticism following the conclusion of hostilities in 1815 holds a disquieting implication: war appears to be a necessary condition for Romanticism to inhabit itself fully. As Samuel Taylor Coleridge pointedly observes in his 1798 poem “Fears in Solitude,” Romantic poetry originates in war, which exercises the passions and the imagination as it is brought home through a fast-expanding machinery of periodical publication. In Coleridge’s reading, Romantic literature operates an aesthetic ideology which converts violence and conflict into bracing messages of sympathetic national unity, leaving behind the realities of war as a destabilizing if largely unobserved remainder:
也许在文学史上,浪漫主义比其他任何时代都更受战争的影响;它的关键日期定在战争的关键时刻,当时在背景中肆虐。因此,普遍接受的浪漫主义定年体系声称,这一时期的开端是1789年法国大革命之后,新的思想和表达方式开始扎根,从1792年开始,在随后的七次反法同盟战争中得到发展,并在1815年反法同盟战争结束时开始逐渐减弱,在1830年左右完全结束。1815年6月18日的滑铁卢战役是一个方便的转折点,通常被视为从战时过渡到和平时期的标志:它定义了现代战争的性质,这是一场前所未有的、规模空前的战争,涉及大约“20万人……”在一块只有四公里(2.5英里)见方的土地上;在此之前或之后,从来没有这么多的士兵聚集在如此狭窄的战场上”(Barbero 311)。滑铁卢战役是现代战明史上具有里程碑意义的时刻,也可以被解读为浪漫主义衰落的标志。大约从1815年开始,浪漫主义思想开始分裂;进入一个自信的、自持的生产的先导阶段,接着是一个以犹豫、自谦的繁殖为标志的第二个缓和期(Nemoianu)。1815年战争结束后,人们常说浪漫主义的紧缩,这有一个令人不安的暗示:战争似乎是浪漫主义充分扎根的必要条件。正如塞缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治(Samuel Taylor Coleridge)在他1798年的诗《孤独中的恐惧》(Fears in Solitude)中所指出的那样,浪漫主义诗歌起源于战争,通过快速扩张的期刊出版机制,它可以锻炼人们的激情和想象力。在柯勒律治的阅读中,浪漫主义文学运用了一种美学意识形态,将暴力和冲突转化为充满同情的民族团结的振奋人心的信息,把战争的现实留在后面,作为一种不稳定的东西,如果很大程度上没有被注意到:
期刊介绍:
Partial Answers is an international, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the study of literature and the history of ideas. This interdisciplinary component is responsible for combining analysis of literary works with discussions of historical and theoretical issues. The journal publishes articles on various national literatures including Anglophone, Hebrew, Yiddish, German, Russian, and, predominately, English literature. Partial Answers would appeal to literature scholars, teachers, and students in addition to scholars in philosophy, cultural studies, and intellectual history.