{"title":"The evaluative dimension of metaphor in discourse: Nn the possibilities of bringing together conceptual metaphor theory and appraisal theory","authors":"Ksenija Bogetić","doi":"10.2298/jfi2001123b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mechanisms of metaphorical evaluation have to date been little explored in the study of evaluative language and the study of metaphor, despite some earlier attempts to place them more firmly on the linguistic science agenda. The founders of Conceptual Metaphor Theory have argued that metaphor structures thought by influencing not only our understanding of concepts, but also our ability of criticising, evaluating and stance taking (Lakoff, Johnson 1999: 2), which is sporadically mentioned in approaches to linguistic evaluation, but with no theoretical or practical interaction with existing analyses of metaphor in discourse. The present paper explores the nature of metaphorical evaluation, drawing on the example of metaphorical representations of language in newspaper discourse. The analysis of the discourse on language is used to discuss metaphorical evaluation, to empirically examine its prominence in the discourse, and its contribution to the construction of meaning, as well as to discuss the broader theoretical and methodological implications. The findings point to the importance of metaphor in the evaluative subsystem of graduation, seen in the interaction of metaphorical and hyperbolic meanings. More broadly, it is argued that bringing together conceptual metaphor analysis and Appraisal Theory analysis offers a rich theoretical apparatus for socio-cognitive discourse analysis.","PeriodicalId":30153,"journal":{"name":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/jfi2001123b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mechanisms of metaphorical evaluation have to date been little explored in the study of evaluative language and the study of metaphor, despite some earlier attempts to place them more firmly on the linguistic science agenda. The founders of Conceptual Metaphor Theory have argued that metaphor structures thought by influencing not only our understanding of concepts, but also our ability of criticising, evaluating and stance taking (Lakoff, Johnson 1999: 2), which is sporadically mentioned in approaches to linguistic evaluation, but with no theoretical or practical interaction with existing analyses of metaphor in discourse. The present paper explores the nature of metaphorical evaluation, drawing on the example of metaphorical representations of language in newspaper discourse. The analysis of the discourse on language is used to discuss metaphorical evaluation, to empirically examine its prominence in the discourse, and its contribution to the construction of meaning, as well as to discuss the broader theoretical and methodological implications. The findings point to the importance of metaphor in the evaluative subsystem of graduation, seen in the interaction of metaphorical and hyperbolic meanings. More broadly, it is argued that bringing together conceptual metaphor analysis and Appraisal Theory analysis offers a rich theoretical apparatus for socio-cognitive discourse analysis.
迄今为止,在评价性语言和隐喻的研究中,隐喻评价的机制还很少被探索,尽管一些早期的尝试将它们更牢固地放在语言科学的议程上。概念隐喻理论的创始人认为,隐喻不仅通过影响我们对概念的理解,还通过影响我们的批评、评价和立场采取的能力来构建思维(Lakoff, Johnson 1999: 2),这在语言评价方法中偶尔被提及,但与现有的语篇隐喻分析没有理论或实践上的相互作用。本文以报纸语篇中的语言隐喻表征为例,探讨了隐喻评价的本质。对语言话语的分析是用来讨论隐喻评价,实证检验其在话语中的突出地位及其对意义构建的贡献,以及讨论更广泛的理论和方法意义。研究结果指出隐喻在毕业评价子系统中的重要性,体现在隐喻和双曲线意义的相互作用上。更广泛地说,概念隐喻分析和评价理论分析的结合为社会认知语篇分析提供了丰富的理论工具。