Microbial keratitis: Causative organisms, susceptibilities and trends at a tertiary eye hospital in South Africa

C. Anderson, Nicki Rees, K. Koetsie, A. Rose, A. Makgotloe
{"title":"Microbial keratitis: Causative organisms, susceptibilities and trends at a tertiary eye hospital in South Africa","authors":"C. Anderson, Nicki Rees, K. Koetsie, A. Rose, A. Makgotloe","doi":"10.4102/aveh.v81i1.778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Microbial keratitis is a sight-threatening disease. Empiric management is based on current regional microbial sensitivity patterns.Aim: This study aimed to describe the demographics and microbial patterns of keratitis at St John Eye Hospital and compare it with data from the same centre 10 years prior.Setting: A tertiary eye care centre in Soweto, South Africa.Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of the microbiological reports of patients treated for microbial keratitis between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2018.Results: The median age of patients was 42 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–77) with a male predominance of 57.0% (n = 65/113). Culture positivity rate was 63.0% (n = 84/133). There was a predominance of Gram-positive organisms of 63.0% (n = 84/133). The most common Gram-positive organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (32.0%, 42/133), and the most common Gram-negative organism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.0%, 8/133). Other common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (14.0%, 18/133), Streptococcus pneumoniae (9.0%, 12/133) and Streptococcus viridans (5.0%, 6/133). Commonly used fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin had resistance of 4.2% and 10.0%, respectively. Gentamicin had a resistance of 5.8%. Culture positivity rate increased compared to 2008 from 52% to 63%. There was an increase from 2008 to 2018 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from 2% to 6%. There was little change in antibiotic resistance profiles between the two study periods (2008 and 2018).Conclusion: Culture positivity rate has increased at our institution and suggests improvements in detecting organisms and antibiotic susceptibilities. There does not seem to be any change in the susceptibilities of organisms between the study periods; therefore, it suggests current empiric management remains appropriate.","PeriodicalId":7694,"journal":{"name":"African Vision and Eye Health","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Vision and Eye Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v81i1.778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microbial keratitis is a sight-threatening disease. Empiric management is based on current regional microbial sensitivity patterns.Aim: This study aimed to describe the demographics and microbial patterns of keratitis at St John Eye Hospital and compare it with data from the same centre 10 years prior.Setting: A tertiary eye care centre in Soweto, South Africa.Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of the microbiological reports of patients treated for microbial keratitis between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2018.Results: The median age of patients was 42 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–77) with a male predominance of 57.0% (n = 65/113). Culture positivity rate was 63.0% (n = 84/133). There was a predominance of Gram-positive organisms of 63.0% (n = 84/133). The most common Gram-positive organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (32.0%, 42/133), and the most common Gram-negative organism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.0%, 8/133). Other common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (14.0%, 18/133), Streptococcus pneumoniae (9.0%, 12/133) and Streptococcus viridans (5.0%, 6/133). Commonly used fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin had resistance of 4.2% and 10.0%, respectively. Gentamicin had a resistance of 5.8%. Culture positivity rate increased compared to 2008 from 52% to 63%. There was an increase from 2008 to 2018 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from 2% to 6%. There was little change in antibiotic resistance profiles between the two study periods (2008 and 2018).Conclusion: Culture positivity rate has increased at our institution and suggests improvements in detecting organisms and antibiotic susceptibilities. There does not seem to be any change in the susceptibilities of organisms between the study periods; therefore, it suggests current empiric management remains appropriate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微生物角膜炎:南非一家三级眼科医院的病原微生物、易感性和趋势
背景:细菌性角膜炎是一种危害视力的疾病。经验性管理是基于当前的区域微生物敏感性模式。目的:本研究旨在描述圣约翰眼科医院角膜炎的人口统计学和微生物模式,并将其与10年前同一中心的数据进行比较。地点:南非索韦托的一家三级眼科护理中心。方法:对2018年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间接受细菌性角膜炎治疗的患者的微生物学报告进行回顾性横断面研究。结果:患者年龄中位数为42岁(四分位数间距[IQR]: 3-77岁),男性占57.0% (n = 65/113)。培养阳性率为63.0% (n = 84/133)。革兰氏阳性菌占63.0% (n = 84/133)。最常见的革兰氏阳性菌为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)(32.0%, 42/133),最常见的革兰氏阴性菌为铜绿假单胞菌(6.0%,8/133)。其他常见病原菌为金黄色葡萄球菌(14.0%,18/133)、肺炎链球菌(9.0%,12/133)和翠绿链球菌(5.0%,6/133)。常用氟喹诺酮类药物环丙沙星和莫西沙星的耐药率分别为4.2%和10.0%。庆大霉素耐药率为5.8%。与2008年相比,培养阳性率从52%上升到63%。从2008年到2018年,铜绿假单胞菌的数量从2%增加到6%。在两个研究期间(2008年和2018年),抗生素耐药性概况几乎没有变化。结论:培养阳性率有所提高,提示在微生物检测和抗生素敏感性方面有待改进。在研究期间,生物体的敏感性似乎没有任何变化;因此,它表明当前的经验性管理仍然是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Vision and Eye Health
African Vision and Eye Health Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Optometrists’ perspectives on speciality programme development in South Africa Pathophysiology of dry eye disease and novel therapeutic agents Impact of spectacle wear on the quality of life of learners with hearing impairment in Ghana Clinical characteristics and associated factors of diabetic retinopathy in Sudanese patients Refractive error accuracy and user perceptions of a smartphone home-based tester
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1