Blood viscosity and inflammatory indices in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Y. Balcioglu
{"title":"Blood viscosity and inflammatory indices in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A retrospective cross-sectional study","authors":"Y. Balcioglu","doi":"10.14744/dajpns.2023.00210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Alterations in blood flow and inflammation may be associated with the treatment response of psychotic disorders. However, changes in blood viscosity in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) have yet to be studied. We examined whether blood viscosity and systemic inflammatory status varied between patients with TRS, remitted schizophrenia, and healthy subjects. Method: Forty patients with TRS, 40 remitted schizophrenia patients, and 43 age-and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled in this retrospective file review study. Whole blood viscosity (WBV) was calculated according to de Simone’s formula at low and high shear rates (LSR and HSR, respectively). Complete blood count (CBC) markers of inflammation were recorded through screening data at admission. Results: In patients with TRS, WBV at both LSR and HSR was significantly decreased, whereas all CBC markers of inflammation were significantly increased compared to controls. Remitted patients had significantly decreased WBV at HSR than controls. There was no significant correlation between blood viscosity and CBC markers in patients. According to the regression models, the systemic immune-inflammation index (β=0.578) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (β=1.844) were significantly associated with WBV at LSR in multivariate analyses, whereas the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive subscale (β=-0.330) was significantly associated with WBV at HSR in univariate analyses in the patient sample. Conclusion: TRS, associated with decreased blood viscosity and increased inflammatory status, may not fully explain such a relationship. Prospective studies would help establish the extent to which hemorheological and inflammatory characteristics reflect the pathophysiological process underlying treatment responsiveness as well as cardiovascular morbidity.","PeriodicalId":11480,"journal":{"name":"Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/dajpns.2023.00210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Alterations in blood flow and inflammation may be associated with the treatment response of psychotic disorders. However, changes in blood viscosity in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) have yet to be studied. We examined whether blood viscosity and systemic inflammatory status varied between patients with TRS, remitted schizophrenia, and healthy subjects. Method: Forty patients with TRS, 40 remitted schizophrenia patients, and 43 age-and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled in this retrospective file review study. Whole blood viscosity (WBV) was calculated according to de Simone’s formula at low and high shear rates (LSR and HSR, respectively). Complete blood count (CBC) markers of inflammation were recorded through screening data at admission. Results: In patients with TRS, WBV at both LSR and HSR was significantly decreased, whereas all CBC markers of inflammation were significantly increased compared to controls. Remitted patients had significantly decreased WBV at HSR than controls. There was no significant correlation between blood viscosity and CBC markers in patients. According to the regression models, the systemic immune-inflammation index (β=0.578) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (β=1.844) were significantly associated with WBV at LSR in multivariate analyses, whereas the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive subscale (β=-0.330) was significantly associated with WBV at HSR in univariate analyses in the patient sample. Conclusion: TRS, associated with decreased blood viscosity and increased inflammatory status, may not fully explain such a relationship. Prospective studies would help establish the extent to which hemorheological and inflammatory characteristics reflect the pathophysiological process underlying treatment responsiveness as well as cardiovascular morbidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗抵抗性精神分裂症的血液粘度和炎症指标:一项回顾性横断面研究
目的:血流和炎症的改变可能与精神障碍的治疗反应有关。然而,治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)患者血液粘度的变化尚未得到研究。我们检查了TRS患者、精神分裂症缓解患者和健康受试者之间的血液粘度和全身炎症状态是否存在差异。方法:选取40例TRS患者、40例精神分裂症缓解期患者和43例年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者为研究对象。在低剪切率和高剪切率(LSR和HSR)下,根据de Simone公式计算全血粘度(WBV)。通过入院时的筛查数据记录全血细胞计数(CBC)炎症标志物。结果:与对照组相比,TRS患者LSR和HSR的WBV均显著降低,而所有CBC炎症标志物均显著升高。缓解组患者在高铁时的白细胞比对照组明显减少。患者血液黏度与CBC指标无显著相关性。根据回归模型,在多因素分析中,患者样本的全身免疫炎症指数(β=0.578)和单核细胞/淋巴细胞比率(β=1.844)与LSR时的WBV显著相关,而在单因素分析中,阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)阳性亚量表(β=-0.330)与HSR时的WBV显著相关。结论:TRS与血液黏度降低和炎症状态增加有关,但可能不能完全解释这种关系。前瞻性研究将有助于确定血液流变学和炎症特征在多大程度上反映了治疗反应性和心血管发病率背后的病理生理过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The importance of scalable, evidence-based clinical assessment instruments in forensic psychiatry Blood viscosity and inflammatory indices in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A retrospective cross-sectional study Validation and reliability process of the preliminary form of the Maternal Burnout Scale in Turkish Mothers (T-MBS) Somatic symptoms, functionality, and bipolar disorder type 1: The role of childhood trauma A new aspect for the treatment of SUNCT headache
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1