In vivo proton range validation using pseudo proton radiography

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI:10.1117/12.2653669
Chih-wei Chang, Shuang Zhou, Yuan Gao, Liyong Lin, Tian Liu, J. D. Bradley, Tiezhi Zhang, Jun Zhou, Xiaofeng Yang
{"title":"In vivo proton range validation using pseudo proton radiography","authors":"Chih-wei Chang, Shuang Zhou, Yuan Gao, Liyong Lin, Tian Liu, J. D. Bradley, Tiezhi Zhang, Jun Zhou, Xiaofeng Yang","doi":"10.1117/12.2653669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current clinical practice for Monte Carlo (MC) treatment planning reserves a 3.5% margin to compensate for proton range uncertainty. Additionally, patient positional uncertainty is typically 3-5 mm for proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) treatment planning. These two uncertainties compromise the sparing of spine vertebrae in proton CSI patients. Computer tomography (CT) material characterization contributes approximately 2.5% proton range uncertainty. Multiple CT-tomaterial conversion methods have been investigated using dual-energy CT or magnetic resonance imaging to improve the range uncertainty. However, there is a lack of experimental data to validate the credibility of those material characterization models. We aim to develop an in vivo proton range method using pseudo proton radiography to validate imaging-based material characterization models consistently. Proton radiography techniques, such as proton water equivalent thickness (WET) and dose maps, were used to evaluate the in vivo proton range accuracy. Anteroposterior proton beams were penetrated through an anthropomorphic phantom. Then the exit doses were measured from proton radiography imaging. The validation experiment applied a newly designed multi-layer strip ionization chamber (MLSIC) for the first time to perform four-dimensional (4D) measurement for depth doses from 625 proton spots in two minutes. The depth doses of each spot were post-processed into WET imaging. A MatriXX PT was applied for 2D measurement from 19x19 cm2 proton fields. We compared the performance of the empirical DECT model and physics-informed machine learning (PIML) models for material conversion. The results indicated that the PIML-based material characteristic method generated more accurate WET and dose imaging using DECT compared to conventional machine learning and empirical material inference methods. The proposed in vivo proton range validation method can be used to quantify the credibility of DECT-based material conversion models for proton range enhancement. The method can potentially provide in-room patient anatomy changes to accomplish online adaption for modification. This technique will significantly benefit proton flash therapy, which demands high accuracy.","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"17 1","pages":"124632K - 124632K-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2653669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current clinical practice for Monte Carlo (MC) treatment planning reserves a 3.5% margin to compensate for proton range uncertainty. Additionally, patient positional uncertainty is typically 3-5 mm for proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) treatment planning. These two uncertainties compromise the sparing of spine vertebrae in proton CSI patients. Computer tomography (CT) material characterization contributes approximately 2.5% proton range uncertainty. Multiple CT-tomaterial conversion methods have been investigated using dual-energy CT or magnetic resonance imaging to improve the range uncertainty. However, there is a lack of experimental data to validate the credibility of those material characterization models. We aim to develop an in vivo proton range method using pseudo proton radiography to validate imaging-based material characterization models consistently. Proton radiography techniques, such as proton water equivalent thickness (WET) and dose maps, were used to evaluate the in vivo proton range accuracy. Anteroposterior proton beams were penetrated through an anthropomorphic phantom. Then the exit doses were measured from proton radiography imaging. The validation experiment applied a newly designed multi-layer strip ionization chamber (MLSIC) for the first time to perform four-dimensional (4D) measurement for depth doses from 625 proton spots in two minutes. The depth doses of each spot were post-processed into WET imaging. A MatriXX PT was applied for 2D measurement from 19x19 cm2 proton fields. We compared the performance of the empirical DECT model and physics-informed machine learning (PIML) models for material conversion. The results indicated that the PIML-based material characteristic method generated more accurate WET and dose imaging using DECT compared to conventional machine learning and empirical material inference methods. The proposed in vivo proton range validation method can be used to quantify the credibility of DECT-based material conversion models for proton range enhancement. The method can potentially provide in-room patient anatomy changes to accomplish online adaption for modification. This technique will significantly benefit proton flash therapy, which demands high accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用伪质子放射照相验证体内质子范围
目前临床实践的蒙特卡罗(MC)治疗计划保留3.5%的余量来补偿质子范围的不确定性。此外,对于质子颅脊髓照射(CSI)治疗计划,患者位置不确定性通常为3-5毫米。这两个不确定性损害了质子CSI患者脊柱椎骨的保留。计算机断层扫描(CT)材料表征的质子范围不确定性约为2.5%。利用双能CT或磁共振成像研究了多种CT材料转换方法,以提高范围不确定度。然而,缺乏实验数据来验证这些材料表征模型的可信度。我们的目标是开发一种体内质子范围方法,使用伪质子放射照相来一致地验证基于成像的材料表征模型。使用质子水当量厚度(WET)和剂量图等质子放射技术来评估体内质子范围的准确性。前后质子束穿透一个拟人化的幻体。然后通过质子放射成像测量出剂量。验证实验首次采用新设计的多层条形电离室(MLSIC)在2分钟内对625个质子点的深度剂量进行了四维测量。每个点的深度剂量后处理为WET成像。采用MatriXX PT对19x19 cm2质子场进行二维测量。我们比较了经验DECT模型和物理信息机器学习(PIML)模型在材料转换方面的性能。结果表明,与传统的机器学习和经验材料推断方法相比,基于piml的材料特征方法产生的DECT湿法和剂量成像更准确。提出的体内质子范围验证方法可用于量化基于ect的质子范围增强材料转换模型的可信度。该方法可以潜在地提供室内患者解剖变化,以完成在线调整。这项技术将大大有利于质子闪速治疗,这需要很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
High-risk habitat radiomics model based on ultrasound images for predicting lateral neck lymph node metastasis in differentiated thyroid cancer. Investigating resting-state functional connectivity changes within procedural memory network across neuropsychiatric disorders using fMRI. Optimizing hip MRI: enhancing image quality and elevating inter-observer consistency using deep learning-powered reconstruction. Comparison of diagnostic performance for pulmonary nodule detection between free-breathing spiral ultrashort echo time and free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Knowledge discovery from database: MRI radiomic features to assess recurrence risk in high-grade meningiomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1