An empirical comparison of models for dropout prophecy in MOOCs

Nidhi Periwal, Keyur Rana
{"title":"An empirical comparison of models for dropout prophecy in MOOCs","authors":"Nidhi Periwal, Keyur Rana","doi":"10.1109/CCAA.2017.8229935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MOOCs are Massive Open Online Courses, which are offered on web and have become a focal point for students preferring e-learning. Regardless of enormous enrollment of students in MOOCs, the amount of dropout students in these courses are too high. For the success of MOOCs, their dropout rates must decrease. As the proportion of continuing and dropout students in MOOCs varies considerably, the class imbalance problem has been observed in normally all MOOCs dataset. Researchers have developed models to predict the dropout students in MOOCs using different techniques. The features, which affect these models, can be obtained during registration and interaction of students with MOOCs' portal. Using results of these models, appropriate actions can be taken for students in order to retain them. In this paper, we have created four models using various machine learning techniques over publically available dataset. After the empirical analysis and evaluation of these models, we found that model created by Naïve Bayes technique performed well for imbalance class data of MOOCs.","PeriodicalId":6627,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"906-911"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAA.2017.8229935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

MOOCs are Massive Open Online Courses, which are offered on web and have become a focal point for students preferring e-learning. Regardless of enormous enrollment of students in MOOCs, the amount of dropout students in these courses are too high. For the success of MOOCs, their dropout rates must decrease. As the proportion of continuing and dropout students in MOOCs varies considerably, the class imbalance problem has been observed in normally all MOOCs dataset. Researchers have developed models to predict the dropout students in MOOCs using different techniques. The features, which affect these models, can be obtained during registration and interaction of students with MOOCs' portal. Using results of these models, appropriate actions can be taken for students in order to retain them. In this paper, we have created four models using various machine learning techniques over publically available dataset. After the empirical analysis and evaluation of these models, we found that model created by Naïve Bayes technique performed well for imbalance class data of MOOCs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
mooc辍学预测模型的实证比较
mooc是指在网络上提供的大规模开放在线课程,已经成为喜欢电子学习的学生的焦点。尽管mooc的招生人数庞大,但这些课程的辍学率过高。为了mooc的成功,他们的辍学率必须降低。由于mooc中继续生和辍学生的比例差异较大,通常在所有mooc数据集中都观察到班级失衡问题。研究人员已经开发出模型,使用不同的技术来预测mooc中的辍学学生。影响这些模型的特征可以在学生注册和与mooc门户的交互过程中获得。利用这些模型的结果,学生可以采取适当的行动来留住他们。在本文中,我们在公开可用的数据集上使用各种机器学习技术创建了四个模型。通过对这些模型的实证分析和评价,我们发现Naïve贝叶斯技术所建立的模型对于mooc的不平衡类数据表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sentiment analysis on product reviews BSS: Blockchain security over software defined network A detailed analysis of data consistency concepts in data exchange formats (JSON & XML) CBIR by cascading features & SVM ADANS: An agriculture domain question answering system using ontologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1