The spatial distribution of American black bear–human interactions in Virginia, USA

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY Ursus Pub Date : 2021-01-12 DOI:10.2192/URSUS-D-19-00017.1
Katherine C. Malpeli, J. Kolowski, Jaime L. Sajecki
{"title":"The spatial distribution of American black bear–human interactions in Virginia, USA","authors":"Katherine C. Malpeli, J. Kolowski, Jaime L. Sajecki","doi":"10.2192/URSUS-D-19-00017.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: American black bear (Ursus americanus; hereafter, black bear) populations in Virginia, USA, have been recovering from near extirpation for the past century. The expansion of both human and bear populations has coincided with an increase in human–black bear interactions. Mitigating human–black bear problems is a management priority of the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Although the number of reported interactions has increased, no formal analysis of the spatial distribution of these interactions has been completed for Virginia. To address this gap, we assessed the role of ecological and anthropogenic variables in explaining the spatial distribution of human–black bear interactions in Virginia, at both county- and individual interaction point-scales, from 2008 to 2015. The results of these analyses indicate that landscape features representing the interface of potentially suitable black bear habitat and human development combine to increase risk of human–black bear interactions. Point locations with the highest probability of a black bear interaction had intermediate housing densities (300–600 houses/km2) and forest covered a large percentage of the surrounding landscape. At the county scale, interactions were predicted to be above average when the county exceeded roughly 67.7% forest, 27.2% agricultural cover, and 10.3% developed land. These results, combined with our generated high-resolution map of predicted relative risk, can be used to help target the strategic implementation of management actions aimed at reducing negative human–black bear interactions in Virginia, as well as throughout the Mid-Atlantic region.","PeriodicalId":49393,"journal":{"name":"Ursus","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ursus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-19-00017.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: American black bear (Ursus americanus; hereafter, black bear) populations in Virginia, USA, have been recovering from near extirpation for the past century. The expansion of both human and bear populations has coincided with an increase in human–black bear interactions. Mitigating human–black bear problems is a management priority of the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Although the number of reported interactions has increased, no formal analysis of the spatial distribution of these interactions has been completed for Virginia. To address this gap, we assessed the role of ecological and anthropogenic variables in explaining the spatial distribution of human–black bear interactions in Virginia, at both county- and individual interaction point-scales, from 2008 to 2015. The results of these analyses indicate that landscape features representing the interface of potentially suitable black bear habitat and human development combine to increase risk of human–black bear interactions. Point locations with the highest probability of a black bear interaction had intermediate housing densities (300–600 houses/km2) and forest covered a large percentage of the surrounding landscape. At the county scale, interactions were predicted to be above average when the county exceeded roughly 67.7% forest, 27.2% agricultural cover, and 10.3% developed land. These results, combined with our generated high-resolution map of predicted relative risk, can be used to help target the strategic implementation of management actions aimed at reducing negative human–black bear interactions in Virginia, as well as throughout the Mid-Atlantic region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国维吉尼亚黑熊与人类互动的空间分布
摘要:美洲黑熊;在过去的一个世纪里,美国弗吉尼亚州的黑熊数量已经从几近灭绝的状态中恢复过来。人类和熊数量的增长与人类与黑熊互动的增加同时发生。减轻人类与黑熊之间的问题是维吉尼亚狩猎与内陆渔业局的首要管理任务。尽管报道的相互作用的数量有所增加,但弗吉尼亚还没有完成对这些相互作用的空间分布的正式分析。为了解决这一差距,我们评估了生态和人为变量在解释弗吉尼亚州人与黑熊相互作用的空间分布中的作用,包括县与个人的相互作用,从2008年到2015年。这些分析结果表明,代表潜在适宜黑熊栖息地和人类发展界面的景观特征共同增加了人类与黑熊相互作用的风险。最有可能与黑熊发生相互作用的地点具有中等的房屋密度(300-600间房屋/平方公里),森林覆盖了周围景观的很大一部分。在县域尺度上,当县域森林覆盖面积超过67.7%、农业覆盖面积超过27.2%、发达土地覆盖面积超过10.3%时,交互作用高于平均水平。这些结果,结合我们生成的预测相对风险的高分辨率地图,可以用来帮助目标管理行动的战略实施,旨在减少弗吉尼亚州以及整个大西洋中部地区人类与黑熊的负面互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ursus
Ursus 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ursus includes a variety of articles on all aspects of bear management and research worldwide. Original manuscripts are welcome. In addition to manuscripts reporting original research, submissions may be based on thoughtful review and synthesis of previously-reported information, innovative philosophies and opinions, and public policy or legal aspects of wildlife conservation. Notes of general interest are also welcome. Invited manuscripts will be clearly identified, but will still be subject to peer review. All manuscripts must be in English. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed, and subject to rigorous editorial standards.
期刊最新文献
Brown bear food habits in natural and human-modified landscapes in West-European Russia Escaping heat and anthropogenic pressures? Asiatic black bear denning behavior in its westernmost global range Interactions between brown bear cubs of different mothers in Kashmir, India Social network analysis uncovers hidden social complexity in giant pandas Survey on gastro-intestinal parasites of captive sun bears in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1