{"title":"Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)","authors":"Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie","doi":"10.11648/J.AJBIO.20210904.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.","PeriodicalId":7478,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of BioScience","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of BioScience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJBIO.20210904.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.
间作与单作相比有许多优点,但单作也存在显著的问题,研究间作有充分的理由。因此,研究者从产量优势、经济效益、产量稳定性、病虫害防治、养分利用效率等方面提出了系统的间作评价方法。然而,由于这些优势,间作在世界许多地方,特别是在埃塞俄比亚等发展中国家实行。2012年和2019年在阿瓦达农业研究分中心进行了田间试验,以评估咖啡与菠萝带状间作比例对两种作物产量和产量构成的影响,并确定研究区咖啡与菠萝带状间作比例的经济最佳选择。试验采用完全随机区组设计,设3个重复。使用咖啡品种(Fayate)和滑辣椒菠萝品种。实验包括5个处理:咖啡底、菠萝底、1:1、1:2、1:3咖啡与菠萝的比例。混合平均分析表明,与其他间作处理相比,单作咖啡和菠萝的产量静态最高。在带状间作处理中,净咖啡产量最高和最低的是1C∶1P (1289 kg ha-1)和1C∶2P (1128 kg ha-1)处理。总土地当量比最高的是1C:3P(1.50),其次是4C:1P(1.36)、1C:1P(1.32)和1C:2P(1.23),咖啡-菠萝带状间作的相对产量优势为23% ~ 50%。因此,这一发现表明,咖啡与菠萝以1C:3P的比例带状间作是一种可行的选择,对农民来说,产量和产量利润的可持续生产力是最高的总LER。