Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)

Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie
{"title":"Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)","authors":"Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie","doi":"10.11648/J.AJBIO.20210904.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.","PeriodicalId":7478,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of BioScience","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of BioScience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJBIO.20210904.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咖啡与凤梨带状间作对组成作物产量及产量优势的影响
间作与单作相比有许多优点,但单作也存在显著的问题,研究间作有充分的理由。因此,研究者从产量优势、经济效益、产量稳定性、病虫害防治、养分利用效率等方面提出了系统的间作评价方法。然而,由于这些优势,间作在世界许多地方,特别是在埃塞俄比亚等发展中国家实行。2012年和2019年在阿瓦达农业研究分中心进行了田间试验,以评估咖啡与菠萝带状间作比例对两种作物产量和产量构成的影响,并确定研究区咖啡与菠萝带状间作比例的经济最佳选择。试验采用完全随机区组设计,设3个重复。使用咖啡品种(Fayate)和滑辣椒菠萝品种。实验包括5个处理:咖啡底、菠萝底、1:1、1:2、1:3咖啡与菠萝的比例。混合平均分析表明,与其他间作处理相比,单作咖啡和菠萝的产量静态最高。在带状间作处理中,净咖啡产量最高和最低的是1C∶1P (1289 kg ha-1)和1C∶2P (1128 kg ha-1)处理。总土地当量比最高的是1C:3P(1.50),其次是4C:1P(1.36)、1C:1P(1.32)和1C:2P(1.23),咖啡-菠萝带状间作的相对产量优势为23% ~ 50%。因此,这一发现表明,咖啡与菠萝以1C:3P的比例带状间作是一种可行的选择,对农民来说,产量和产量利润的可持续生产力是最高的总LER。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Some Agrochemical Types on the Biochemical Composition of Tomato’s Cultivars (Solanum lycopersicum L.) The Connection Between the High Frequency Data and Schizophrenia A New Epistemological Insight of the Coniacian-Santonian Oceanic Anoxic Event (OAE3) Prevalence of Fibromyalgia in Patients at the University Hospital of Cocody-Abidjan in Côte d'Ivoire Profile of Biochemical Markers and Viral Load in a Population of Blood Donors Infected with Hepatitis B and Naive Antiretroviral Treatment in Abidjan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1