Effects of single versus multiple tracts on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy outcomes

Shakir Saleem Balindi, Khidhur Saleh Khidhur
{"title":"Effects of single versus multiple tracts on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy outcomes","authors":"Shakir Saleem Balindi, Khidhur Saleh Khidhur","doi":"10.22317/imj.v6i4.1209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The study designed to compare outcomes and morbidities in patient undergoes multi tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus single tract PCNL. \nMethods: From October 2019 to September 2020, 50 patients were prospectively investigated at Azadi Teaching Hospital and Vajeen Private Hospital in Duhok, Iraq. Group A included 25 patients who received single tract PCNL while group B had 25 patients who underwent multiple tract PCNL. Complex renal stones are treated with single or multiple tract PCNL depending on stone configurations and urinary system architecture utilising Guy's stone score. Laboratory and imaging data were correlated with stone size, stone-free rate, mean haemoglobin decrease, operation time, hospital stay, and postoperative problems. \nResults: 64% of cases are male and 36% are female. The mean stone size in Group A was 3.3 cm (ranges 2.0 - 4.9 cm), but in Group B it was 5.1 cm (ranges 3.3 - 7.4 cm), which is substantially bigger. Group A's mean operational time was 64.4 minutes (ranges from 30-115 minutes), which is statistically significant compared to multiple tracts' 80.2 minutes (ranges from 45-120minutes). The decline in mean hemoglobin between the two groups is statistically significant. Group A and B had 8% and 12% blood transfusions, which is not significant. Group A had a mean hospital stay of 28.2 hours (20-48 hours), whereas group B had 40.8 hours (ranges 24-96 hours). In group A, 16% of patients experienced post-operative fever, whereas in group B, 20% did. 84% of single tract PCNL and 88% of multiple tract PCNL were stone-free. \nConclusion: Complex renal stones treated by multiple tracts PCNL; is efficient and safe with acceptable postoperative outcomes and complications in comparison to single tract PCNL.","PeriodicalId":32555,"journal":{"name":"Iraq Medical Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraq Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22317/imj.v6i4.1209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study designed to compare outcomes and morbidities in patient undergoes multi tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus single tract PCNL. Methods: From October 2019 to September 2020, 50 patients were prospectively investigated at Azadi Teaching Hospital and Vajeen Private Hospital in Duhok, Iraq. Group A included 25 patients who received single tract PCNL while group B had 25 patients who underwent multiple tract PCNL. Complex renal stones are treated with single or multiple tract PCNL depending on stone configurations and urinary system architecture utilising Guy's stone score. Laboratory and imaging data were correlated with stone size, stone-free rate, mean haemoglobin decrease, operation time, hospital stay, and postoperative problems. Results: 64% of cases are male and 36% are female. The mean stone size in Group A was 3.3 cm (ranges 2.0 - 4.9 cm), but in Group B it was 5.1 cm (ranges 3.3 - 7.4 cm), which is substantially bigger. Group A's mean operational time was 64.4 minutes (ranges from 30-115 minutes), which is statistically significant compared to multiple tracts' 80.2 minutes (ranges from 45-120minutes). The decline in mean hemoglobin between the two groups is statistically significant. Group A and B had 8% and 12% blood transfusions, which is not significant. Group A had a mean hospital stay of 28.2 hours (20-48 hours), whereas group B had 40.8 hours (ranges 24-96 hours). In group A, 16% of patients experienced post-operative fever, whereas in group B, 20% did. 84% of single tract PCNL and 88% of multiple tract PCNL were stone-free. Conclusion: Complex renal stones treated by multiple tracts PCNL; is efficient and safe with acceptable postoperative outcomes and complications in comparison to single tract PCNL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单束与多束对经皮肾镜取石效果的影响
目的:本研究旨在比较多道经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与单道肾镜取石术(PCNL)患者的预后和发病率。方法:对2019年10月至2020年9月在伊拉克杜胡克的Azadi教学医院和Vajeen私立医院的50例患者进行前瞻性调查。A组25例患者接受单路PCNL, B组25例患者接受多路PCNL。复杂的肾结石可根据结石的形态和泌尿系统结构采用单路或多路PCNL治疗。实验室和影像学资料与结石大小、结石游离率、平均血红蛋白下降、手术时间、住院时间和术后问题相关。结果:男性占64%,女性占36%。A组的平均结石大小为3.3厘米(范围为2.0 - 4.9厘米),而B组的平均结石大小为5.1厘米(范围为3.3 - 7.4厘米),大得多。A组平均手术时间为64.4分钟(范围为30-115分钟),与多路手术的80.2分钟(范围为45-120分钟)相比具有统计学意义。两组平均血红蛋白下降有统计学意义。A、B组输血量分别为8%、12%,差异无统计学意义。A组的平均住院时间为28.2小时(20-48小时),而B组为40.8小时(24-96小时)。在A组,16%的患者出现术后发热,而在B组,20%的患者出现术后发热。84%的单路PCNL和88%的多路PCNL无结石。结论:多束PCNL治疗复杂肾结石;与单路PCNL相比,PCNL有效且安全,术后结果和并发症可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antigenic markers of T. gondii for chronic forms of toxoplasmosis in fertility age women Prevalence, Risk Factors and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Review with Current Evidence Cycle day 2 serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 as a prognostic indicator for poor responders to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation Serum Level of Vitamin K as Predicts Mortality in Iraqi COVID-19 Patients Study of the most prevalent parasitic diseases especially pinworm among children aged (5-12years) in various areas of Dhi Qar Governorate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1