The dark past of slavery in American plantation houses: Website promotion and perceptions of visitors in TripAdvisor reviews

S. Cavalieri, Sara Corrizzato, Valeria Franceschi
{"title":"The dark past of slavery in American plantation houses: Website promotion and perceptions of visitors in TripAdvisor reviews","authors":"S. Cavalieri, Sara Corrizzato, Valeria Franceschi","doi":"10.5937/zrffp52-39989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The visual and linguistic representations of tourism destinations for promotional aims may be affected by their primary function of acquiring new visitors; for this reason, they are not always \"value-free expressions of a place's identity\" (Pritchard & Morgan, 2001, p. 177). The concept of dark tourism seems to perfectly mirror the connection between terminological choices and culturally-bound constraints. It has been acknowledged that several dark tourism sites tend to valorise (or hide) events associated with tragedy and death, attracting tourists' interest for their (non)macabre details at the expense of historical objectivity. This is the case of plantation houses in the US, whose narrative on slavery has often been \"whitewashed\" and minimized (e.g., Harnay, 2022; Butler, 2001; Eichstedt & Small, 2002). This study aims at investigating how visitors to popular plantation destinations in the US perceive and evaluate the presentation of the experience of slavery in these sites vis-à-vis what is presented on the plantation websites. The analysis is therefore twofold: first, a qualitative multimodal study of the content included in the websites of the plantations will shed light on whether the websites include information on the role of slave labour in the plantations, and secondly, a corpus-assisted investigation of the visitors' reviews posted on TripAdvisor will attempt to clarify how visitors perceive the plantations as a tourist location, and the importance they place on receiving honest information about the brutality of slavery during their visits. The mixed-methods approach has allowed researchers to delve into this phenomenon from two opposite, but intertwined, perspectives: one driven by experts officially promoting the visit through the websites and the other offered by visitors sharing their personal experiences and feelings.","PeriodicalId":55773,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp52-39989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The visual and linguistic representations of tourism destinations for promotional aims may be affected by their primary function of acquiring new visitors; for this reason, they are not always "value-free expressions of a place's identity" (Pritchard & Morgan, 2001, p. 177). The concept of dark tourism seems to perfectly mirror the connection between terminological choices and culturally-bound constraints. It has been acknowledged that several dark tourism sites tend to valorise (or hide) events associated with tragedy and death, attracting tourists' interest for their (non)macabre details at the expense of historical objectivity. This is the case of plantation houses in the US, whose narrative on slavery has often been "whitewashed" and minimized (e.g., Harnay, 2022; Butler, 2001; Eichstedt & Small, 2002). This study aims at investigating how visitors to popular plantation destinations in the US perceive and evaluate the presentation of the experience of slavery in these sites vis-à-vis what is presented on the plantation websites. The analysis is therefore twofold: first, a qualitative multimodal study of the content included in the websites of the plantations will shed light on whether the websites include information on the role of slave labour in the plantations, and secondly, a corpus-assisted investigation of the visitors' reviews posted on TripAdvisor will attempt to clarify how visitors perceive the plantations as a tourist location, and the importance they place on receiving honest information about the brutality of slavery during their visits. The mixed-methods approach has allowed researchers to delve into this phenomenon from two opposite, but intertwined, perspectives: one driven by experts officially promoting the visit through the websites and the other offered by visitors sharing their personal experiences and feelings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国种植园奴隶制的黑暗历史:网站推广和TripAdvisor评论中访问者的看法
旅游目的地的视觉和语言表达可能会受到吸引新游客的主要功能的影响;由于这个原因,它们并不总是“一个地方身份的价值自由表达”(Pritchard & Morgan, 2001, p. 177)。黑暗旅游的概念似乎完美地反映了术语选择和文化约束之间的联系。众所周知,一些黑暗旅游景点倾向于夸大(或隐藏)与悲剧和死亡有关的事件,以牺牲历史客观性为代价,以其(非)可怕的细节吸引游客的兴趣。这就是美国种植园的情况,其关于奴隶制的叙述经常被“粉饰”和最小化(例如,Harnay, 2022;巴特勒,2001;Eichstedt & Small, 2002)。本研究旨在调查美国热门种植园目的地的游客如何感知和评估这些网站中奴隶制经历的呈现(参见-à-vis种植园网站上呈现的内容)。因此,分析是双重的:首先,对种植园网站中包含的内容进行定性多模式研究,将阐明网站是否包含种植园中奴隶劳工的信息;其次,对游客在TripAdvisor上发布的评论进行语料辅助调查,将试图澄清游客如何看待种植园作为一个旅游景点,以及他们在访问期间接受有关奴隶制残酷的诚实信息的重要性。混合方法的方法使研究人员能够从两个相反但相互交织的角度深入研究这一现象:一个是由专家通过网站正式推广访问,另一个是由访问者分享他们的个人经历和感受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bibliografija - pomoć svakom dijalektologu - Marković Brankica: Ka indeksiranju dijalekatskih tekstova publikovanih u Republici Srbiji, Srpski dijalektološki zbornik, Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti i Institut za srpski jezik SANU, Beograd, 2022 Intertextuality in The Two Noble Kinsmen Marija Milutinović Punktatorka, teacher: The first woman lawyer in Serbia Literary criticism of Milenko Maticki Financial literacy of students in Serbian language and literature classes in the second cycle of primary education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1