Speakers are creative, within limits — a response to Peter Uhrig

Q1 Arts and Humanities Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.1515/cogsem-2020-2028
Thomas Hoffmann
{"title":"Speakers are creative, within limits — a response to Peter Uhrig","authors":"Thomas Hoffmann","doi":"10.1515/cogsem-2020-2028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In his contribution to the present volume, Uhrig (2020. Cognitive Semiotics 13, 1) focusses on an interesting question: When is a novel utterance considered “creative” and when is it seen as “wrong?” As I will show, Uhrig offers many important answers to this question. At the same time, I argue 1) that deliberateness is not (always) important for linguistic creativity; 2) that appropriateness requires a closer look; and 3) that frequency does not (always) play the most important role.","PeriodicalId":52385,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semiotics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In his contribution to the present volume, Uhrig (2020. Cognitive Semiotics 13, 1) focusses on an interesting question: When is a novel utterance considered “creative” and when is it seen as “wrong?” As I will show, Uhrig offers many important answers to this question. At the same time, I argue 1) that deliberateness is not (always) important for linguistic creativity; 2) that appropriateness requires a closer look; and 3) that frequency does not (always) play the most important role.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
演讲者在一定范围内是有创造力的——这是对彼得·乌里格的回应
在他对本卷的贡献中,乌里格(2020。《认知符号学》专注于一个有趣的问题:什么时候一种新颖的话语被认为是“创造性的”,什么时候它被认为是“错误的”?正如我将展示的,乌里格为这个问题提供了许多重要的答案。与此同时,我认为1)刻意对语言创造力并不(总是)重要;2)适当性需要仔细观察;3)频率并不(总是)起着最重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Semiotics
Cognitive Semiotics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Art, pictoriality and semiotics – a reflection on Göran Sonesson’s contribution to art theory Psychologism in the study of children’s semiotic development Apple-and-pin drawings by blind novices show occluded features: region theory The cultural semiotics of Jingshen and cognitive homeostasis Dialogue and the “miracle of language”: the early and late Bakhtin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1